ESV Study Bible :
3. Preterism (from Latin praeteritum,
“the thing that is past”) thinks that the fulfillment of most of
Revelation’s visions already occurred in the distant past, during the
early years of the Christian church. Preterists think these
events—either the destruction of Jerusalem or the decline and fall of
the Roman Empire, or both—would “soon take place” only from the
standpoint of John and the churches of Asia. Some preterists interpret
the order of the visions as reflecting the chronological succession of
the events they signify, but others recognize the presence of
recapitulation (that is, that distinct, successive visions sometimes
symbolize the same historical events or forces from complementary
perspectives; see Structure and Outline). Full preterism—which
insists that every prophecy and promise in the NT was fulfilled
by a.d. 70—is not a legitimate evangelical option, for it denies Jesus’
future bodily return, denies the physical resurrection of believers at
the end of history, and denies the physical renewal/re-creation of the
present heavens and earth (or their replacement by a “new heaven and
earth”). However, preterists who (rightly) insist that these
events are still future are called “partial preterists.” (p. 2457,
Introduction to Rev.)

11/16/9:
-
Josephus Bibliography/Free
Online Books: A.L.O.E. -
Stories of the Wars of the Jews from the Babylonish Captivity to the
Destruction of Jerusalem
(1884) "The Lord had foretold that false prophets should
arise and deceive many, and that fearful sights
and great signs should be from heaven; and these
words were literally fulfilled. The miserable Jews
desperately grasped at the hope of a coming Messiah, and eagerly listened to deceivers, who only
lured them to ruin. A wonder in the sky, resembling a fiery sword, hung over the devoted
city ; appearances as of chariots and assembling
armies in the clouds terrified the astonished beholders ; and one night the priests in the temple
were alarmed by a quaking of the earth, accompanied by a strange sound, and a voice which
uttered the mysterious words, "Let us depart !"
-
Audio: Charles H. Roberts, Th.M. D.Min -
A Comprehensive Study of the Book of Revelation (2003) "The Book of
Revelation is one of the most controversial and difficult books of the
Bible. Its rich and dramatic apocalyptic language continues to be the
subject of widely divergent interpretations. In this series, originally
done in 2003, Rev. Charles H Roberts, Th.M. D.Min., takes the listener
through a verse by verse study to prove that the events described in
this much misunderstood book are in our past, having been fulfilled in
the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in AD 70." (Not sure the
proper classification for this ... unfamiliar with Roberts.)
-
Charles Kassel -
The Fall of the Temple: A
Study in the History of Dogma (1905) "Those whose views have
been molded by theology may still cling to the belief that the Maker of
all. to revenge the kindly and forgiving Galilean for the fate suffered
at the hands of a corrupt priesthood whose prestige and privileges He
threatened, brought low with sword and flame the great common people of
Judea who "heard him gladly." The partisans of ancient Israel, on the
other hand, who deem the acts of Titus mere wanton ruin and murder, may
still see in the catastrophes of his reign unmistakable evidences of
divine displeasure. The more thoughtful, however, who refuse to believe
that the Creator contrives afflictions to scourge His erring children,
will decline to attribute to the anger of God either the horrors that
Titus wrought or the horrors that Titus suffered. "
-
Preterist Universalism: Discussion on: Adam and
“Death” to “all” men (2009) "Thus the above
being true, God has no more enemies – and THIS makes logical sense with
a consistent prêteristic hermeneutic. Thus if as
Pantelism contends – that in the AD70 Parousia of Christ the "last
enemy" to be destroyed was "the death", and if along with
this death the venom of "the sin" duly empowered by "the law"
likewise suffered demise; and if further, God having reconciled all
things in heaven and on earth to Himself through the blood of Christ's
cross [Col 1:20]; THEN regardless of what you or I or anybody else
thinks or reasons – God has no more enemies. Now even if in the
ignorance or arrogance of some men's feeble thinking they consider
themselves enemies of God, from HIS perspective they are not [Col 1:21].
Thus if we agree that "the last enemy to be destroyed was death" then
consistency dictates God has no more enemies, period! And so… IF God has
made peace, and the Scriptures testify He has, then who are we to
question His gracious will?"
(http://preterismdebate.ning.com/profiles/blogs/adam-and-death-to-all-men)
11/15/9:
-
Added to
Former Full Preterists,Futurism,Hyper-Regressive:
Brian Simmons -
Why Hyper Preterism Teaches a Different Gospel
(2009) "Firstly, the concept of
“salvation” endorsed by Hyper-Preterism is radically
different from that which Futurists espouse.
Historically, Christians have always believed that salvation
involves redemption from the consequences of Adam’s fall. These include
moral and physical death as well as indwelling sin.
That is, we see the results of Adam’s fall as being not simply moral
in nature, but physical and anthropological as well.
Paul writes, again and again, that the “entire man” is covered by
Christ’s redemptive plan (see 1 Thessalonians 5: 23;
Romans 8: 11; 1 Corinthians 6: 13-20;
Ephesians 1: 14)."
-
Former Full Preterists:
John Anderson has added a second weekly radio show of "The Voice of
Reason Live!", which is simulcast on Paltalk on Thursday nights.
-
11/11/9:
-
Israel displays coins from AD69 "The
coins sit inside a glass case, some melted down to unrecognizable chunks
of pockmarked and carbonized bronze from the flames that destroyed the
Temple. "These really show us the impact of the destruction of Jerusalem
in the first century," said Gabriela Bijovsky, an antique coin expert
from Israel Antiquities Authority. "These are a very vivid, dramatic
example of that destruction."
-
Why Was Temple Destroyed?:
Michel Wex
Haaretz Interview - Scholar and popularizer of Yiddish, whose latest
offering draws from two millennia of Jewish tradition to serve as a
primer for being a mentsh "You look at something like the story
in the Talmud about the destruction of Jerusalem, about Kamtso and Bar
Kamtso. Ultimately it turned on a piece of khnoykishkayt
[hypocritical sanctimoniousness]" // Wex focuses on the Talmudic
explanation for the destruction of the Second Temple, which is
attributed to a feud between two Jews of firstcentury C.E. Jerusalem.
The servant of a man throwing a party mistakenly invites Bar Kamtso, an
enemy of his boss, instead of his friend Kamtso. The host, rather than
making the best of an awkward situation, pointedly refuses to admit Bar
Kamtso when he shows up at the gathering. An embarrassed Bar Kamtso
offers to cover the cost of the entire party if he is only allowed to
stay, but the host kicks him out, humiliating him before his peers, none
of whom bothers to come to his defense. Bar Kamtso decides to take his
revenge by sabotaging an offering of a calf that the Roman emperor has
sent to the Temple. In a fatal display of small-minded pettiness, the
Temple’s priests refuse to accept the blemished offering, thereby
insulting the emperor, who then orders the city attacked and the Temple
destroyed. In Michael Wex’s − and the Talmud’s − eyes, everyone
involved in the tale behaved badly, schmuckishly in fact, and with
devastating consequences. Each character allows his anger to get the
better of him − and self-control, the author argues, is one of the most
basic lessons of Judaism.
-
Former Full Preterists: Vince
Krivda -
Preterism and the Estate of Man after Death |
Part Two (2009 Video) //
Full Preterism and Reformed Theology
11/10/9:
-
Futurism: Charles Finney -
Salvation Difficult to the Christian, Impossible
to the Sinner (1852) "For the time has come that judgment
must begin at the house of God; and if it first begin at us, what shall
be the end of them that obey not the gospel of God?" This may refer to
the destruction of the city and temple of God's ancient people, yet the
evidence for the opinion does not seem to be decisive. "
-
Historical:
Gottesblog: The Abomination of Desolation
(2009) "Jesus was a prophet (He was
the Prophet, actually), and as such, He did what all prophets do,
gave a microcosm of the ultimate fulfillment of His prophecy within the
immediate context of His first hearers. So when the microcosm occurs,
or, as it were, the 'down-payment' on the final fulfillment, that is,
when the 'type' is fulfilled, then that which it typifies or foretells
may be the more confidently believed. So therefore, since
Jerusalem was destroyed in ad 70, and since this is a matter of record,
therefore it is clear that the End of all things shall indeed come to
pass."
11/5/9:
-
William Price:
Prophecy, Eschatology, and Reformed Theology (2009) "This is why, in
short form, why I have come back to a past fulfillment view of
eschatology. I feel this view is indeed in alignment with the teachings
of scripture. Either we take the Lord at His word, or we do not."
11/3/9:
-
Hyper/Regressive:
Sam Frost -
“We deny that any man receives a new
body - or new bodily form - or receives glorification upon the death of
his physical body. His life in Christ is so made one with Christ and the
Father by the Spirit that such essentials as pertains to this unity are
not to be seen as lacking in any way for the believer. To say essentials
are added to the believer as it pertains to the Gospel promises when
their physical bodies expires takes away, we believe, from what God has
fully and entirely accomplished for the explicit purpose of having “all
things” apply to our life in this fallen world, so that upon death there
is nothing lacking, but only a forward expectation of continued
blessings under the Grace and Righteousness of God.” (From Kelly
Nelson Birks: "Here’s Sam’s latest statement concerning the resurrection
from RoC website. If this doesn’t sound like a cult-leader-type
statement i don’t know what is. And people actually wonder about why I
am not a FP")
11/2/9:
-
Former Full Preterists/Hyper:
PaulT:
Gnostic Ties to Hyperpreterism - A Review of Sam Frost's "Essay's on the
Resurrection of the Dead" (2009) "Sam Frost, a leading proponent of
hyperpreterism has redefined the nature of the resurrection of the dead
along Gnostic lines.. For Wright, the
passages of Mk 13, and Mt 24, 25 are fulfilled by the time of A.D.70,
the ‘end of the age’….Amazingly, however, Wright does not include the
resurrection of the dead in any of the above passages. It is clear that
in his analysis of 1 Co 15 the resurrection, parousia, and ultimate
defeat of death (which he takes as physical death), are yet still future
events.. After making this comment, he
never reviews any of Wright’s exegesis of 1 Cor 15 to determine why it
is Wright doesn’t make the connection between the Olivet discourse and 1
Cor 15. I think I know why, Wright’s argument is too solid for Frost to
attack in his glossed over “analysis” of the text. I recommend the
reader examine Wright’s argument to see why I believe that this is the
case."
10/24/9:
HERE'S A BIG ONE FOR YOU READERS OF
LATIN:
10/20/9:
10/17/9:
-
Genea/Critical:
Bob DeWaay -
"This Generation" and its Preterist Exegetical
Misuse (2007)
"The term genea is
used most often in the New Testament in a pejorative sense. In those
cases when “generation” is used pejoratively (often with modifiers like
“evil, unbelieving, perverse,” etc.) it functions as a qualitative
statement about a group of people. Though often, but not always,
addressed to people then living, the key idea is the spiritual condition
of the people, not the number of their years or the time of their
living. The meaning in these cases is “an ethnic group exhibiting
cultural similarities—‘people of the same kind.’”3
When used this way in the New Testament, the similarities are always bad
characteristics. There are some cases where the ideas of “people of the
same time” and “people of the same kind” are combined."
10/16/9:
10/15/9:
-
Ed
Hindson message: Can we still believe in the Rapture? "After giving
examples from Scripture that explain the rapture and Christ’s triumphal
return, Hindson gave students 10 reasons for why Liberty is committed to
a pre-tribulation rapture. They included knowing that the Church — the
Bride of Christ — is not the object of divine wrath (so Christians
aren’t meant to experience the tribulation period), and knowing that the
rapture is imminent, instantaneous and unique."
10/13/9:
10/12/9:
-
-Sanctification, Justification, and
Glorification were completed at the AD70 Parousia/Last Judgment
(From the article "Justification", 2009, parenthesis mine)
-
"Justification is not a
“process”, but sets into motion a “process” that
climaxes at the (AD70)
parousia."
-
"Therefore, I defined
sanctification, for us living in the
(post-AD70) “age to come” now, as that
which is entirely complete..
However, since we view the “age to come” as
already here, it is perfectly logical to insist that we are not
longer, as a Church, as the Wife of the Lamb, no the Bride, are
“being sanctified.”
-
"Righteousness, or
'justification' was, in some sense, although already obtained, was
“about to be” imputed to those who believed (at AD70). Hope is mixed
with the present reality, but the fact remains, Justification is, in
some sense, connected to the (AD70)
Final Judgment."
-
"I conclude that whatever link
or connection justification has to the (AD70) Final Judgment, we
believe that it has, in its fullness of
salvation, been completed. That
Christians are not in a relationship, regardless of their believing
that they are, with God that “hopes” for righteousness. They
are, upon the apprehension of God, and upon that free gift and
ability to trust in God, immediately and
entirely justified in the fullest measure of that term possible.
They are sanctified in the same measure,
and are also glorified by their union with the Glorious Body of
Christ. This is how God sees the Church today, post (AD70) judgment,
and how He relates to the Church today."
-
"The Gospel
and salvation are not realities in which the believer enter into a
“struggle” that is in tension between “already” and “not yet. He
does not enter into a relationship with God in which he is being
“put to death” and “made alive.” In Christ, upon believing the
Gospel, the sinner is immediately and entirely “declared” righteous.
He awaits no future standing before God to hear this declaration. He
has already heard it."
“For it is not the hearers of the law
who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be
justified." Romans 2:13 / "It is appointed unto men once to die, and after
that the judgment." Hebrews 9:27
10/11/9:
Former Full Preterists - New
Addition! Dr. Kelly Nelson
Birks (the
pastor who ordained Sam Frost)
-
"As one
who made it clear back in '04 in print in one of my books, that I am not
a FP, I have nothing to "come out from", as I have never since then
espoused any type of a FP view, as it must of necessity contradict many
scriptures that state an on-going nature to the things stated past AD
70, as well as the "resurrection issue" with CBV."
-
"Hyper-Preterism,
which I also see as “full” preterism"
-
"For many
years I have tried to work from “within” in order to safeguard against
where some factions within this movement are now headed. Some here on
this site who have been engaging them, I believe, are right to do so. I
believe i have unmasked some of the problems along with those within who
have formally come out and admitted that FP or HP cannot co-exist within
reformed theology. This has been so direct and prevelent as of late,
that there should be no squirming away from it by them.
-
"I have
come to the conclusion that it is correct at this juncture, to continue
to draw the line as to what is and is not tolerable within the FP camp.
I see no working definable difference between hyper and full preteism.
The things I have stated here as to “problems” within the movement, are
just the beginning. Cult-like tendencies of theological manipulation
have begun to evidence themselves more and more from within.
Consequently, I am more and more delimited as to the actual affiliations
i can maintain in the formal sense."
-
"And so
we all have/will (in our futures), experience the event of the parousia
together. I hold to the experience of this event as a future event."
Roderick Edwards
(2009)
-
"With the hyperpreterists
telling us justification and sanctification are instantaneous, and
telling us to believe in a future resurrection means we’re not yet
saved; hyperpreterism can no longer pretend their belief is a minor
“tweak”."
-
"What you have described
above is exactly the phase ALL of us former-hyperpreterist went through
— first seeing the corruption all around, but wanting to do all we could
to retain some sense of “orthodoxy” within the movement — eventually we
began to see, it is the nature of heresy to continue to degrade."
Sharon Nichols
(2009)
-
“Now, to
conclude my short comment here, let me say to those who have been
speaking quite openly about what the intentions of this group are (as if
they know), stating that I’ve been duped by the Heterodox Preterists (as
if I am completely clueless), and wondering out loud if my renouncement
of Heterodox Preterism is real, let me assure them that I HAVE renounced
Heterodox Preterism. I have a good support base, I have found a
wonderful Reformed Presbyterian Church to attend and am currently
enrolled in the Introductory class in order to become a member.
-
Oh, and
don’t let me forget to say that, Yes, I believe Heterodox Preterism
ultimately teaches a different Gospel. As far as not associating with
them? Well, to take a cue from one of the tag lines of T.D., “Sitting
next to a Heterodox Preterist doesn’t make me one. What I do to them
CAN.”
10/10/9:
-
Critical/Hyper:
Richard Pratt, Reformed Theological Seminary -
Hyperpreterism and Unfolding Biblical Eschatology
(2005) "In a word, hyper-preterists miss the central concern of biblical
prophecies about the eschaton. They reduce the nature of Christ's return
to a nebulous, relatively inconsequential spiritual return in order to
defend a misconceived notion of the integrity of biblical prophecy. As a
result, they fail to see the crucial fact that the radically cosmic,
physical, cataclysmic eschatological vision of the Old and New
Testaments calls believers in every century to serve Christ faithfully
in order to hurry the day when he will return and renew all things. The
eschatological hope of Christ's glorious, physical return has rightly
inspired Christians throughout the centuries as they have suffered
sickness, temptations, trials, prosecutions, and death. This hope still
inspires us to remain faithful to our Lord today. As in the first
century, Christ's imminent return is offered to us, and we too pray that
he will fulfill that promise in our day."
-
Modern/Gary
DeMar:
Charisma Magazine Debunking 'Last Days Fever'
(2009) “Peter Wagner, president of Global Harvest Ministries, is an
adherent of partial preterism, believing most end-times prophecies were
fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.” Wagner is the
author of Dominion! How Kingdom Action Can Change the World
published by Chosen Book in 2008. There are better representatives for
the partial preterist position than Wagner, but at least it’s a start."
-
Critical:
Preterism is a form
of mental illness "Of course, when
Christianity itself inculcates delusional thinking in a fundamental way,
we should not be surprised when a faction within Christianity, a small
and justly derided one, concocts their own new wrinkle to the entire
delusional tableau."
10/9/9:
10/3/9:
-
"Orthodox Preterist":
Gary DeMar and Hyperpreterism (2009) "DeMar finally answers, twice
saying he doesn’t think “all forms of full preterism” are heretical, but
only the “goofy” kind. Frost, as is DOCUMENTED once again throws some of
his fellow full preterists under the bus by referring to them as
“low-rent” and up there with “Charles Manson and Jim Jones”."
10/2/9:
-
Alexander Tilloch:
Dissertations
introductory to the study and right understanding of the Apocalypse
(1823) "I think with Grotius, and with Michaelis, (if that continued to
be his opinion,) that it was written in the time of Claudius;—-or, at
all events, not later than the reign of Nero, as maintained by Sir Isaac
Newton, Bishop Newton, and others." (HIGHLY recommended text on the
study of John's Apocalypse)
10/1/9:

9/30/9:
-
Hyper/Gary
DeMar:
Is
Gary DeMar Secretly a Friend to Hyperpreterists?
(2009) "The
tendency of full preterists is to fit everything into an A.D. 70 matrix.
They do this with 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18, 1 Corinthians 15, and
Revelation 20. A similar approach is followed with a number of Old
Testament prophecies (e.g., Ezek 38–39 and Zech 12). I am willing to
listen to their arguments since preterism in its present form is only
now coming to its own as we shake off the dust of dispensationalism that
has so distorted our interpretation of prophecy."
9/29/9:
9/22/9:
9/19/9:
9/9/9:
-
Stephen Douglas:
My love
affair with theology (2009) "So why haven’t I been blogging? My love affair with
theology is on the rocks. I know, the base definition of “theology” is
what we believe about God, and I’m certainly always looking to having a
better understanding of Him and His ways. ..You can contrive an internally
consistent history and theology as gleaned from the information in the
Lord of the Rings or the Star Trek universe, but your
systematization of them is going to be nothing more than a clever
fiction unless you can find correspondence in the real world."
9/7/9:
"To cut her off, and on the breakers thrust ?
While thus forlorn he waits, a nearer doom
Seems in a quicksand on his course to loom :
And threat'ning cloud and breakers are forgot
In fears by fate so imminent begot.
Just thus did waiting Zion now espy
A blazing Comet burst upon the sky :
In shape a sword, sword o'er the city hung,
A portent too significant is flung
And memories of all before expire
In view of this presentiment in fire!"
Martin Goodman "The destruction of
Jerusalem in 70 was the product of no long-term policy on either side.
It had come about through a combination of accidents, most of them
unrelated in origin to the conflict: the death of Nero, leading to
Vespasian’s bid for power in Rome and Titus’ quest for the propaganda
coup of a rapid conquest of Jerusalem, and the devastating effect in the
summer heat of a firebrand thrown by a soldier into the Temple of God."
(Rome and Jerusalem, 423)
9/6/9:
-
Bleek's History of the Use of the Apocalypse - Starting with
Grotius "(Herder) expresses himself to the effect that he viewed the
entire destruction of Jerusalem only as a sign, pledge, type of the
final and greater end of things, and that the proper object of prophecy
is to develop this end in such sign and pledge. Yet this point of view
does not appear definitely in the interpretation itself. But he gives
prominence to the practical particulars whereby the
Apocalypse is a book for all hearts and
for all times."
|
"hyper-preterism"
Defined...
and self applied by Full Preterist Book:
"It may surprise students of Biblical theology: When we combine the
eschatological teachings of the great theologians of the Reformed
church throughout the centuries, we arrive at "hyper-preterism":
(A
House Divided Back Book Cover) |
From the back cover -
"hyper-preterism" is what is arrived at:
 |
9/3/9:
Two New Classifications within Preterism Offered :
EXTRACTS FROM LETTERS FROM GERMANY. "August: 1800.—On the morning before Eatisbonne was taken, a grand
and solemn ceremony was performed in the cathedral, of which the band and
organ are reckoned the best in Germany. At one passage of the
Latin service, the fears of the inhabitants of a siege and bombardment
seemed to be expressed in the words, ' Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, thou shalt be made desolate!' The prophecy was chanted by
a shrill single voice, like one from the dead, at the further end of the
long echoing cathedral. A dreadfully sublime pause succeeded, and then the
whole thunder of the organ, drums, and trumpets, broke in. I never thought
terrific music could have reached so high. Two hours after an alarm was
given, and the Hungarian infantry were called out to support their defeated
countrymen. This music, though less sacred, was also perfect in its kind.
Its effect was heightened by the sound of artillery coming nearer and
nearer, and the flash of carbines from the neighbouring wood, where they
were skirmishing in small parties. The sight of men and horses passing, gave
a serious aspect to the scene, and convinced the spectator that he was not
hearing the drums of a holiday parade." (Diary of a Lady of Quality, pp.
26,27)
William Revell Moody (1900)
"In Christ Came Again Dr.
Urmy labors with zeal and diligence to establish the old theory, discredited
by every evangelical creed, every catholic creed, and every generally
acknowledged exegete of Christendom, that Christ came before the close of
the apostolic age in a sense which completely fulfilled all predictions
concerning His parousia and apokalupsis. His utter variance,
not only from the pre-millennial bat also from the post-millennial view of
the second advent, is fully confessed by himself. He says: "The system of
eschatology which this work presents requires that certain changes be made
not only in the current thought of the day concerning the second coming of
Christ, but in creeds, articles of faith, rituals, and hymns, where they
refer to this and kindred eschatological subjects." We wish Dr. Urmy joy of
this task!" (Record of Christian work, Volume 19, p. 381)
9/1/9:
-
Critical ("A must read!"):
Lewis Sperry Chafer -
The Second Advent of Christ Incarnate
(1947) On earlier theology of Wm. Clarke "This
work of fiction which does not even draw its material from the Bible --
though for remote identification it must introduce Christ and His
disciples - is one mass of impossible error in doctrine from its
beginning to its end ; yet this work on theology has had acceptance
with, and commendation from, an unusually large company of ministers and
professors of note. Its fallacies should be noted briefly: (a) The
entire assumption that Christ's coming is fulfilled by a "spiritual and
invisible" program ignores every event connected with His return.
(b) The writer confuses Christ's personal coming with His omnipresence.
He is in the midst when two or three are gathered unto Him, but that
fact does not imply that His promise to come as Bridegroom and Judge has
been, or is now, being fulfilled. " // "How different would have been
the histroy of theology in the past three centuries and its fruits
today, had theologians accepted the chiliasm of the apostles and the
early church instead of the Federal or Covenant theories introduced by
Johannes Cocceius
and the postmillennialism of
Daniel Whitby --
both living a century after the Reformation!" (pp. 280-287)
-
The Significance of
A.D. 312 & 325 (the Roman Conversion) in Bible Prophecy - Latest
Study Archive!
-
Constantine the
Great... Preterist Emperor -
Eusebius
Pamphilius: "I am filled with wonder at the
intellectual greatness of the emperor, who as if by divine inspiration thus
expressed what the prophets had foretold concerning this monster" (Oration in Praise of Constantine)
-
Robert Arakaki:
Constantine
The Great: Roman Emperor, Christian Saint, History's Turning Point
"Constantine's legacy can be seen in Christianity's transformation from
a private sect into a public church that encompassed the whole of
society. He put it on an institutional footing, which enabled the Church
to be the leading cultural force in the ancient world. The
Christianization of Roman society can be seen as a partial fulfillment
of Revelation 21:24: "The nations . . . shall walk in its [New
Jerusalem] light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor
into it." The Church is the New Jerusalem—replacing the Jerusalem of the
Old Testament—which brings spiritual enlightenment to the pagan nations
throughout the Roman Empire."
8/31/9:
-
David Hocking:
What is
Preterism? (2005) "Preterists believe that the promise of our
Lord’s Second Coming began to be fulfilled in the destruction of
Jerusalem in 70 AD. Some believe that the prophecies mentioned above
were fulfilled in the Second Century AD at the time of the Second Jewish
Revolt against the Roman Empire at the time of Emperor Hadrian. Some
preterists hold that the prophecies were fulfilled during the first
three centuries AD as God wages war on the enemies of the Church (which
they argue include Israel and Rome!) resulting in the “Christianization”
of the Roman Empire under Constantine."
-
"Hyper-preterism"
Defined /
Divided
Against Itself: Added to
Matthew 26:64 Not a "Preterist Time Indicator" Pointing to AD70 -
Dave Green on Jesus' Parousia being "from now on" at his trial: "6.
Jesus told Caiaphas, the chief priests, the scribes, the elders, and the
whole Sanhedrin that "from
now on," they would be seeing the
Parousia (Matt. 26:64; Mk. 14:62; Lk. 22:69)." (Theology Today,
August 30, 2009). Green's Typically Strict AD70 Parousia Date : "Today
the condemning old covenant is ancient history and we dwell securely in
the heavenly places in our Redeemer. These things are realities today
because of Jesus' once-for-all Appearing "for salvation" in A. D. 70."
(Q&A 17) | "Thus
were the saints "manifested" with Christ in His Parousia, when
the worldly sanctuary fell." (Q&A 102) |
"Today,
since the Parousia in 70, the Gospel is fulfilled and all believers in
heaven and on earth are the living, spiritual Body of Christ and the
eternal Tabernacle of God." (Response to
McLaren)
-
Joseph Wood (1906)
"Inspiration is that which is of universal application. If any utterance
is only for an age, and local in its interpretation, we do not regard it as
inspired. The Psalms, for instance, were mostly suggested by local
considerations, the trials, the joys, the experiences of David and others,
under peculiar circumstances. But, nevertheless, we feel as we read them
that they pass beyond the limits of the local and the individual— they
belong to humanity—they are true of human nature and life everywhere. Or
take Christ's prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem. It was spoken at
Jerusalem about Jerusalem, and in a manner which seemed limited to
Jerusalem. But had the prophecy been true only of that city of sorrows, it
would never have been regarded as inspired. Whereas Christ's principle was
this : that the doom pronounced on Jerusalem was universally applicable, and
that it was but a style and specimen of God's judgment everywhere. The
judgment comes wherever there is evil grown ripe for judgment, wherever
corruption is complete. And the gathering of the Roman eagles to the carcase
is but a specimen of the way in which judgment at last overtakes any city,
any country, and any man in whom evil has reached the point where there is
no possibility of cure. We who have lived through the last fifty years have
seen the eagles gathered together in Naples, in America, in France, in
Bulgaria. The Lord's judgment on Jerusalem has been fulfilled many times—it
was not simply of local but of universal application." (The Bible, what it
is and is not [lects.], p. 97)
8/30/9:
-
Frederic W. Farrar:
Christ Wails Over Jerusalem (1899) "This incident is an
allegory. The soul of each one amongst us is such a
Jerusalem. The soul has its history of
shame or of faithfulness, and its prophecy of triumph or of
doom, just as
Jerusalem had. Jerusalem had
warnings.. Jerusalem found that it
was so, and so shall all men who persist in defying the mercy of God
which calleth us to repentance." /
Jerusalem as a visible representation of the
"Heart" - Revealed hermeneutic is
to see invisible in
light of the visible (2 Cor. 4:18)
-
"Hyper"
Preterism
Defined /
Divided
Against Itself: Sam
Frost (2009)
“Um especially - and I don’t mean to bring this up and I don’t want to
discuss it but the Beyond Creation Science stuff - um definitely goes
further than - see I would call - in fact I have an article where I do
refer to that and then the universalizing tendency, I refer to that as
hyper - I call that hyperpreterism. I think a couple of years ago I
started saying this stuff is going so far out into - I don’t know where
anymore” (August 2009 podcast)
-
"Hyper"
Preterism
Divided
Against Itself:
Mike Sullivan Rebuts Sam Frost's Theology
(2009)
"Beloved, do not be deceived,
is not biblical “preterism”
rightly being taught concerning the timing and nature of God’s completed
redemptive plan for man that many of us have come to know and love. It
is carnal futurism both in the timing and nature of fulfillment – plain
and simple. ""There is no more
weeping, because God’s people have been forgiven of their sins. For all
Partial Preterists and even some “Full Preterists,” this is a “Gnostic”
and a shallow view of the passage. However, this is the NT’s
eschatological goal of redemption, and we must reject their “literal
phases” propped up with their invented “not yet” and “ongoing
fulfillments” which the NT authors know nothing of taught
(sic)."
8/29/9:
-
Johann
Peter Lange:
The Life of the Lord : Olivet Discourse
(1844) "As soon as Christ comes to
the destruction of Jerusalem, He
conceives it in the prophetic importance which it has to His disciples.
He assumes that they will live to see the destruction themselves. He
then points out to them the sign by which they were to recognise that
the judgment was about to break over Jerusalem."
-
Free Online Books:
Patrick Fairbairn:
Prophecy Viewed in Respect to its Distinctive
Character; its Special Function and its Proper Interpretation
(1856)
"During the time that the temple and Jerusalem stood, and formed the
centre of the divine kingdom and worship, the predictions, which were of
the nature of promises, received a measure of fulfilment in the case of
the true covenant- people to whom alone they properly referred. But from
the moment that Christ was glorified, as the temple and Jerusalem lost
their original character—as the Jerusalem and the temple, which
thenceforth constituted the real habitation of God and the seat of
worship, rose heavenwards with its Divine Head (Gal. iv. 26, Rev. xxi. 2), it is in connection with that higher region that we are to look
for what yet remains to be fulfilled of the predictions."
-
Critical:
Thomas Scott:
Predictions Respecting the Second Advent of Jesus
(1869) "The first attempt to assign all to the
destruction of Jerusalem until we reach Matt. xxv. 31, is utterly
untenable and indeed absurd. No words can be plainer than those of Matt.
xxiv. 29, 30, 31. If they do not denote the visible coming of the Son of
man in heaven to exercise judgment over all the tribes of earth, no
words whatever suffice to enunciate this doctrine. Nothing but the
extreme stress of the difficulty, extreme reluctance to admit the
ignominious failure of prophecy, could ever drive a sensible man to
pretend that these three verses mean nothing but the overthrow of one
city—the dissolution of one nation."
- Book Excerpt: Hank
Hanegraaff -
The Apocalypse Code
(2007)
-
Critical Articles: Norman
L. Geisler -
A Friendly Response to Hank Hanegraaff's Book, The
Last Disciple (2006) "Of
course even partial preterists are "futurists" regarding the Second
Coming and Resurrection. But they reject the futurist understanding of
the bulk of Book of Revelation. "
-
Critical Articles: Norman
L. Geisler -
A Response to Steve Gregg's Defense of Hanegraaff
(2007) "In brief, Gregg’s attempt to rescue the partial preterist
position he shares with Hank Hanegraaff is a failure. It rests upon a
methodologically unorthodox way of interpreting Scripture. If this same
method were used on the Gospel narratives of the resurrection of Christ,
the preterist would also be theologically unorthodox. Thus, while
partial preterism itself is not heretical, its hermeneutic is
unorthodox, and if applied consistently, would lead to heresy, as indeed
it does in full preterism."
Steve Gregg's Eschatology Series (.mp3
files)
1. Introduction
and definitions (ESC-01)
2. Methods of
Interpretation(ESC-02)
3. The millennium
as the fulfillment of Israel’s Hope (ESC-03)
4. The Millennium
in Revelation (ESC-04)
5. Revelation
20:4 and the historyof millennial thinking (ESC- 05)
6. When will the
rapture be? (ESC-06)
7. The
pretribulational rapture defended (ESC-07)
8. The
pretribulational rapture refuted (ESC-08)
9. Is the future
tribulation taught in scripture? Part 1 (ESC-09)
10. Is the future
tribulation taught in scripture? Part 2 (ESC-10)
11. The Olivet
Discourse Part 1 (ESC-11)
12. The Olivet
Discourse Part 2 (ESC-12)
13. The future
of the Church, Part1(ESC-13)
14. The future
of the Church, Part2(ESC-14)
8/28/9:
-
4 Percent of Israelis Think Obama is Pro-Israel -
The May poll
found that Israelis' views of Obama's predecessor in the White House, George W.
Bush, were nearly the opposite. Some 88% of Israelis considered Bush's
administration pro-Israel, 7% said he was neutral and just 2% labeled him
pro-Palestinian.
8/27/9:
-
"Hyper"
Preterism
Defined:
Jason Bradfield,
Keith Mathison (2009)
"If the debate here is whether or not John Noyes
was a hyper-preterist, then obviously our first and most important task
is to define what is meant by hyper-preterist. We certainly can’t answer
our question if we don’t know what we are looking for. So what is
hyper-preterism according to Mathison? Mathison tells us:
While differing among themselves on
numerous details, proponents of this doctrine are united in teaching the
most basic thesis of hyper-preterism, namely that the Second Coming of
Christ and the events associated with it (e.g. the general resurrection
and the final judgment) occurred during the first century
The next obvious
step is to then examine the writings of Noyes and find out if he taught
the above, namely, that the Second Coming of Christ, the general
resurrection, and the final judgment occurred during the first century.
With that clear definition before us, let us now examine quotes that Mathison provided and ask if it fits that definition" (The Oneida
Community and Hyper Preterism )
Escape
From Tribulation: Pella/Jerusalem as a Type
Jerusalem as a Picture of the Heart
|
Luke 21:20-24, "When
you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its
desolation has come near. Then let those who are in Judea flee
to the mountains, and let those who are inside the city depart, and
let not those who are out in the country enter it, for these are
days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is written." |
Luke 21:34-36,
"Watch yourselves lest your hearts be weighed
down with dissipation and drunkenness and cares of this life, and
that day come upon you suddenly like a trap. For it will come
upon all who dwell on the face of the whole earth. But stay awake at
all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all
these things that are going to take place, and to stand before the
Son of Man." |
Ps 31:4 "Free me from the trap that is set
for me, for you are my refuge |
1Ti 6:9 -
People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and
into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and
destruction. // Re 20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth,
and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city:
and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. // Ps
32:7 - You are my hiding place; you will protect me from
trouble and surround me with songs of deliverance. Selah
8/26/9:
-
Rabbi Irwin Kula: Inglorious Basterds, Vengeance and
Redemption "If the film proves anything, it is
that we have barely begun to clean up the toxic waste of the Holocaust.
There is still plenty of rage and anger that has not risen to the
surface. Presently, liberals and conservatives, hawks and doves have a
nice happy arrangement. One side makes believe they feel no anger or
fear and see evil simply as a social construction to be dealt with by
understanding and diplomacy. The other side makes believe it is not
nightmares from the past that have made it appropriate to see the Nazi
specter in every enemy, to confuse real politic with metaphysical evil.
So we become each other's containers for all our repressed and
disassociated rage and humiliation and fear - with everyone seeing each
other as Nazis - a cornucopia of Nazis. Jews see
Palestinians, Palestinians see Jews, Americans see Arabs, Arabs see
Americans, even opponents of health care reform see Barack Obama, and
supporters of health care reform see noisy town-hall opponents as Nazis.
That which seems so unique has become common. No wonder Inglorious
Basterds feels so good to watch."
-
Charles Dickens on the
Fall of Jerusalem "the siege that
seems to epitomise all the horrors of such contests, forming, as it
were, the last crowning scene of a nation's tragedy, was the siege of
Jerusalem by Titus, A.d. 70. "
8/25/9:
-
Free Online Books:
Douglas Wilson:
Heaven Misplaced: Christ's Kingdom on Earth (2008)
-
Scholarship:
Early Definition of "Preterist", Applied to Stuart in
The Churchman's Monthly Review (1847) "The Professor has found a
key, whereby to disprove, as he thinks, the two rival forms of the
Preterist expositions, and unlock the
whole prophecy. This key is the numerosity, and above all, the
trichotomy of the Apocalypse. This proves that there must be three
catastrophes, the fall of Jerusalem, ch. xi., the death of Nero, ch.
xvi., and the destruction of Gog and Magog, ch. xx. " The trichotomy of
the Apocalypse," he says, " stands pre-eminent in important consequences
as to the interpretation. It settles the question whether there is more
than one catastrophe in the book. This is a great question. ... It is
plain that the writer's main object has been completed antecedently to
this last scene (xx. 7—10). Yet the trichotomy of the book, and
the nature of the case, both demanded a rounding off of the whole in
such a manner! " ' (January, p. 120)
-
Scholarship:
Early Identification of "Hyper Preterism":
Quarterly Journal of Prophecy (1856) "The author (P.S.
Desprez) maintains that the key to the Apocalypse is, that the
destruction of Jerusalem was the second coming of Christ, and that there
is no other advent of Christ to be expected (Lecture xvi.) He is an
ultra-preterist. Those who believe
in a literal coming of the Lord to judgment, yet to take place, he
condemns in language sufficiently strong. Any system (millenarian or
not) that takes for granted a future advent of Christ, is founded on "
strained interpretations"— " patchings of the Word of God"—" positions
plainly untenable." Whereas, his own doctrine (that there is no advent)
is written as with a sunbeam, and the whole body of the Scriptures
coincides with it (p. 431). " (vol. 22, p. 98)
-
Scholarship:
Early Identification of "Hyper Preterism": W. Collingwood
(1893) "Though it necessarily sets aside the extreme preterist view -
that all did take place in the first century - it doesn't interfere with
any other system of prophetic study, either the historic or the
futurist, but would accord alike with either." (The Homiletic Review,
Vol. 26, p. 448)
8/24/9:
-
Dr.
Kenneth G. Talbot:
Samuel Frost and the Westminster Confession
(2009) "Here Mr.
Frost acknowledges himself as rightfully being a ‘heretic’ in light of
Reformed theology. We also read in: The Constitution of Christ Covenant
Church, Organized by Samuel Frost, in Section 1:A 1:2, Frost and others
where they wrote: “We are
fully aware of the opinion by many that preterism is regarded as a
“damnable heresy.”
Dr. Talbot
continues: Again, Mr. Frost clearly understands the implications
of his doctrine in light of both Reformed and Evangelical Christianity.
Why would he acknowledge that he is rightfully being called a ‘heretic’
and a ‘damnable heretic’ (not my words, but Mr. Frost’s and Mr.
Green’s), and then complain about being called a ‘heretic’ and a
‘damnable heretic’ at that? Let’s see if this is logical."
8/23/9:
-
Hyper:
Larry Siegle -
New Wine, Old Wineskins
(2009) "I do believe that some statement
must be made to provide a sense of balance to the recent departure from
(full) Preterism of some, back from whence they came. These
actions are neither new, nor are they surprising as often is the case
when the strongholds of “tradition” are neither broken, nor forsaken. .
The greatest error of Preterism is in our reluctance to “kill the beast”
of allegiance in the hearts and minds of the people to their vain
“traditions” and obsessions with conformity to the doctrines and
practices of those who created the corpses of denominations that are
dying all around us today... When I heard of the recent departure of
some within the community my honest reaction was a deep sense of sadness
in the very depth of my being."
8/21/9:
8/20/9:
-
Futurism:
Jesus Prophetically Pronounced Judgment On His Own
Generation (2007) "Why would a Futurist like myself even
want to bring this point up? Answer: It’s the truth that so many
Futurists try to brush under the carpet when dealing with Preterism. We
need to be honest about 70 A.D. fulfillment, then we can be honest about
all the things that were not fulfilled in 70 A.D. Futurists need to
appreciate this aspect of Preterism. Preterism basically means "in the
past". The part that Futurists disagree with is in saying that the
return of Christ, the new heavens and new earth, the abomination of
desolation, Daniel’s seventieth week, etc. are all in the past. But we
need to concede up front the things that actually are in the past."
8/19/9:
-
Dave Bussard:
Are Matthew 24 and Luke 21 the Same? "Even though Matthew 24 and
Luke 21 contain strong similarities, I contend that the bulk of these
two sections of scripture are different teachings given at separate
times. Both passages teach of the future return of Christ, but I believe
the “tribulation” described in Matt. 24:9-22 is the period of time where
the abomination of desolation will stand in the holy place at the
midpoint of the yet-to-happen 70th Week of Daniel. The “persecution”
described in Luke 21:12-24 speaks of the historical attack on Jerusalem
and the destruction of the temple in 70 A.D. Continue and see if the
following evidence is enough persuade you." (The Pre-Wrath Tribune)
8/16/9:
-
Dr. John
Gill:
The Prophecies of the Old Testament, Respecting Messiah
"The next thing to be inquired into, is the exact and precise time of
the Messiah’s coming, and cutting off, as fixed in Daniel’s
weeks; the whole prophecy we have at large in Daniel 9:24-27.
The occasion of this prophecy is manifestly this; The prophet
Daniel now being in captivity, and understanding by books,
especially by the prophecy of Jeremy, that it would be a
seventy years captivity, falls into a very great concern of mind
for the people of the Jews, the city of Jerusalem, and the holy
temple; and therefore sets apart some time in fasting and prayer to God
on the account thereof; whose prayers were very quickly heard, he being
a person greatly beloved; for even at the beginning of
his supplications, the commandment came forth,
orders were given and the angel Gabriel immediately dispatched,
as a messenger, to give him an account of those things which he was so
very solicitous about; and the things which the angel had a commission
to give him skill and understanding in, were of very
considerable importance; as that there would be a royal edict issued
forth in favor of the Jews; by virtue of which they would have full
liberty to rebuild Jerusalem, the streets and wall
thereof, though it would be attended with a great deal of trouble and
opposition; that after a certain space of time, here specified, was
elapsed, the Messiah, the prince, whom he, and those of his nation
expected, would be cut off; and that upon the cutting off of this great
person, would very quickly ensue the utter ruin and destruction of the
Jewish nation, city, and temple."
-
Free Online Books/Futurism:
Benjamin Wills Newton -
The Prophecy of
the Lord Jesus as Contained in Matthew 24 and 25 (1879 PDF)
Early disciple of Darby
8/14/9:
8/13/9:
-
Emperor Vespasian's abode discovered near Rome
-
Free Online Books:
Israel P. Warren
- The
Book of Revelation: an exposition based on the principles of
Professor Stuart's Commentary, and designed to familiarize
those principles to the minds of non-professional readers
(1885)
If
a book we had never before seen, and of whose contents we were
ignorant, were placed in our hands, we should turn at once to
the title- page to ascertain its subject. If we found
that subject distinctly stated there, we should deem it
conclusive as to the import of the book. We should not regard
ourselves at liberty to assume that it was designed to refer to
something else without clear and positive evidence to that
effect. If, for instance, the title-page declared it to be a
history of the American Revolution, we should not think it
reasonable to expect in it the history of the late Rebellion, or
the life of Napoleon III. The language of the title-page we
should inevitably regard as the key to the. book.
Now the title-page of the Book of Revelation
gives us such a key. We marvel that it should ever have been
misapprehended: "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto
him, to shew unto his servants
THINGS WHICH MUST SHORTLY COME TO PASS."
-
Free Online Books:
Seth Schwartz -
Josephus and His Judean Politics (1990 Limited Preview) /
Pere Villalba i Varneda:
The Historical Method of Flavius Josephus (1986)
8/12/9:
-
HyP-Critical:
C. Michael Patton:
Is the Hyper-Preterist Gospel a Different Gospel?
- Both Parts, with Comments (2008) "I am still not ready to say that
it is damnable, but it seems to me to be an extremely serious departure
from some essential elements in the Gospel. No matter how one defines
orthodoxy, I cannot find a place for the eschatology of the hyper-Preterist.
It is about as far as one can deviate from the beaten path."
8/11/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists - Vince Krivda:
Typological Illustration of My Eschatological View (2009) "I
recently announced that I have supplemented my eschatological view. This
is an introductory survey my view, but by no means the whole picture. I
do not attempt to persuade anyone, nor endeavor to formulate a radically
new system. There are many points that I have not included here. I will
address them as the Lord permits over the next few months. The themes I
will address as I get the time may include Covenant Theology, the curse
and total depravity, definite atonement, redemption of the curse, etc.
These themes among others were what prompted me to reconsider my
eschatological views."
-
Free Online Books: Bryan W. Ball -
A Great Expectation: Eschatological Thought in Protestant England
Protestantism Until 1660 (1975) "Henry Alford's statement that "the
Praeterist view found no favour, and was hardly so much as thought of in
the times of primitive Christianity", is equally true of
seventeenth-century Christianity. In English thought, the
schoolmaster Thomas Hayne contended that Daniel's prophecies had been
entirely fulfilled in the history of Israel up to the time of Christ, as
also did Joseph Hall, who noticeably declined to make any similar
pronouncement concerning The Revelation. Henry Hammond, who in
1647 had become chaplain to Charles I, appears to have been the first
English writer seriously to have adopted Alcasar's interpretation.
Although the work in which his views appeared went through several
editions after its first appearance in 1653, there is no evidence of any
wider involvement with preterism in pre-Restoration thought.. Futurism,
although it received more comment, made even less impression on English
Protestant thought than did preterism."
8/9/9:

8/8/9:
-
Largest Second Temple Model Erected Opposite Temple Mount
-
Former Full
Preterists (Videos):
Vince Krivda:
I Am Not a Full
Preterist (2009) "I wanted to announce with conviction - and with a
pure conscience - that I am no longer a full preterist" /
Full Preterist
Response by Bradfield /
Another by Bowers "Sadly on this day we mark the passing of a dear
friend: my Friend is not deceased but has merely transitioned away from
Fulfilled Eschatology. Yes, another full preterist has strayed from the
herd." // Bradfield asks "What's the difference?" between Jordan and
Hill/Edwards. The difference is that Jordan went from (a)
not welcoming the views of full preterists to (b) welcoming them.
Edwards and Hill, et al, went from (b) welcoming the views of full
preterists to (a) not welcoming them. In fact, Edwards started not
welcoming Bradfield's views even while he was still a full preterist...
and the response to Edwards' criticism then, recall, was just as cold as
it is now that he is no longer "within the fold". Thus, Bradfield
is probably right in saying that it is a personal issue, and the
controversy is not about doctrine.
-
Free Online Books: James Hastings,
John C. Lambert, John Alexander Selbie:
Dictionary of the apostolic church (1915 PDF)
"A closer determination of the date depends mainly on the interpretation
of a passage from ch. iv. This chapter contains a warning that ' the
last offence' is at hand ; for the Lord has shortened the times and the
days that His beloved may come quickly. As a proof that the last
offence, i.e. the Antichrist, is at hand, the writer quotes a
prophecy from the Book of Daniel (Dn 7'-") to the effect that ten
kings shall reign, and after them shall arise a little king who shall
subdue three of the kings in one (ii<t> l»). It is evident that
the writer thinks that this prophecy has been, in part at least,
fulfilled; he has seen something in recent history which corresponds
with this vision. Thus much then seems clear; when he wrote this, there
had been ten Ctesars on the Imperial throne. Unless we are to omit some
of the Emperors from the list—a proceeding for which there seems no
justification—the tenth Emperor brings us to the reign of Vespasian. If
the 'little horn' had already appeared when the Epistle was written,
then we must look for three Emperors subdued by the successor of
Vespasian. And this, of course, Titus did not do. Hence it seems better
to interpret the little horn as Antichrist, who has not yet been
revealed, for this gets rid of the difficulty of tindingpne Emperorwho
had already subdued three. The writer found this reference to three
kings in his text of the prophecy, and meant to leave it to the future
to show who the three were and how they would be overthrown. But no
matter how this point is settled, the tenth horn can scarcely be other
than Vespasian, and this fixes the date of the Epistle at between
A.d. 70 and 79. "
8/6/9:
-
Michael J.
Svigel The Phantom
Heresy: Did the Council of Ephesus Condemn Chiliasm?
(2004) "The pronouncement by the Holy Office referred to therein
occurred in July of 1944 in answer to the following question: “Quid
sentiendum de systemate Millenarismi mitigati, docentis scilicet
Christum Dominum ante finale iudicium, sive praevia sive non praevia
plurium iustorum resurrectione, visibiliter in hanc terram regnandi
causa esse venturum?” The response to the question, confirmed by Pope
Pius XII, was short and direct: “Systema Millenarismi mitigati tuto
doceri non posse,” i.e., “A mild millennial system is not able to be
taught safely” (Henricus Denzinger, ed., Enchiridion Symbolorum:
Definitionum et Declarationum de Rebus Fidei et Morum, 36th
emended ed., ed. Adolfus Schönmetzer [Freiburg: Herder, 1976], 759).
What is meant by “mitigated” or “mild” millennialism and by the
qualifier “safely” renders the official answer ambiguous.
8/4/9:
-
Unique Second Temple inscription discovered in
Jerusalem "The
10-line Aramaic script, which is clear but cryptic, is being deciphered
by a team of epigraphic experts in an effort to determine the meaning of
the text, said Prof. Shimon Gibson, of the University of North Carolina
at Charlotte, who is co-directing the excavation. "This is a difficult
script, not one that is worn or graded, which demands research," Gibson
said. He estimated that it would take a couple of months to
determine what the inscription says. "It is like digging out
grandparents' hand-written letters," he quipped.
8/3/9:
-
Arab leaders put diplomatic onus on Israel "I affirmed to
President Obama that we are interested in bringing about peace in
the Middle East," the emir told reporters as he sat down with Obama at
the
White House.
"It is in our interest that peace be brought about. And the indicator
is that the recent Arab peace initiative that was agreed upon by all of
the Arab parties and states, and we would implement this peace
initiative when Israel implements and fulfills its obligations," he
added.
7/24/9:
7/2/9:
-
Seven Free E-Books from Gary DeMar, including Prophetic Deja Vu
Benito Mussolini
is the Antichrist!” “Adolf Hitler is the Antichrist!” “Joseph Stalin is
the Antichrist!” “The rapture will be in 1988.” “The rapture will take
place before the year 2000.” “Jesus is coming back in our generation.”
“Jesus is coming back soon.” “Jesus really is coming back . . . Soon!”
That last one is the title of a new book.
I’m sure you have
heard claims these before. They accomplish only one thing: They get
people to question the integrity of the Bible. I’ve been following the
history of date setting for 30 years. Others have followed it before me.
Prophecy pot boilers sell in the millions and are then relegated to the
dust bin of history or revised when the newspaper headlines change. It’s
hard to appeal to the Bible when so many people have done it before
claiming that this time they’re right on the timing of prophetic events.
6/30/9:
-
Bone fragments "confirmed" to be Saint Paul - "experts had
drilled a tiny hole in the sarcophagus, which has remained closed for
nearly two millennia, to allow inspection of its interior.
Inside they found "traces of a precious linen cloth, purple in colour,
laminated with pure gold, and a blue coloured textile with filaments of
linen," Benedict said.
"It also revealed the presence of grains of red incense and traces of
protein and limestone. There were also tiny fragments of bone, which,
when subjected to Carbon 14 tests by experts, turned out to belong to
someone who lived in the first or second century."
A story I started reporting
in 2006, prior to the fundamental shift in PreteristArchive.com's focus.
Not sure how much of this story is believable... time will (hopefully)
tell. If true (which is very possible, considering the holiness
with which Paul has been associated by so many faiths // thereby
increasing the likelihood that his resting place would be disturbed by
none other than the Catholic Church -- bless his memory), then there are
a lot of potential benefits to scholarship.
6/28/9:
-
Hyper Preterism:
Alexander Brown:
The Great Day of the Lord:
A Survey of New Testament Teaching on Christ's Coming in His Kingdom,
the Resurrection, and the Judgement of the Living and the Dead
(1890) "To sum the whole into a
sentence — with the fall of Jerusalem, the then existing age was ended, the
dead were judged, the saints were raised to heaven, and a new dispensation
of a world-wide order instituted, of which Christ is everlasting King, and
ever present with His people, whether living here or dead beyond." (p. 257)
- A simple but fundamental mistake, confining the new aion within the
brackets of carnal chronology. It is the same exact mistake
of Futurism, except that the incorrect HyP AD70 dispensational line in
history past has immense theological consequences with which
Futurists will never have to deal, placing their dispensational line as
they do in history future (thereby not ever having to deal with the
myriad complications of living in a global change of spiritual economy
-- which yields theological Universalism of some sort.. hence the high
concentration of Universalist/Pantelist/Comprehensive Grace teachers
within full preterism).
6/17/9:
6/8/9:
5/28/9:
5/25/9:
-
Hyper:
William Bell:
Do You
Pray For The Kingdom to Come? (2009) "As a third grade
student, we had devotionals in our public school classroom everyone
morning which involved the class singing in unison what is typically
known as the Lord’s prayer, See Matt 6:9–13.after studying the prayer, I
discovered that I could not conscientiously pray that prayer as Jesus
taught his disciples to pray it... We no longer live in
expectation. We therefore should no longer pray, your kingdom come, but
rather, offer gratitude and thanks for the kingdom and live as it
demands." (Full Preterist Dispensational line in AD70 )
5/15/9:
-
Preterist Idealism
: Donald James Perry:
Redirectionalism: Absolute Orthodox Idealism and
the Revelation of Jesus Christ(2001)
FREE DOWNLOAD "When Christians are tempted to abandon the apostolic hope
for a fulfilled apostolic eschatological hope, the Church is faced with
dangers. Where man is accountable to know what the second coming means
in the Bible, Preterism can move men to question its relevancy. Many
questions therefore confront the believer, who abandon the apostolic
hope. First, men ask themselves: Shall we speak those same words today?
Are we still allowed to do so? Were those of days gone by of another
age, a different time from ours that is now fulfilled? To what extent
are we now in the new Jerusalem? To what extent did Christ accomplish
the end of some redemptive age in A.D. 70? Does God Himself or does His
way and salvation change?"
OFFICIAL TERM FOR AD70 / 135
"The ‘destruction of Israel’"
"A historic document that can be
definitely dated based on a reference to a historical event such as
the
‘destruction of Israel’ has never been discovered."

NEW SPECIES OF "JUDEAN DESERT" FRAGMENT.
SEEMS CERTAIN TO POST-DATE ENTIRE DSS CORPUS, SO SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN
RECOVERED FROM A DIFFERENT CACHE
-
Fragment
from AD 74 or 139 Discovered in police bust
"Unusually, the first line of the document indicates a precise date, the
IAA said - "Year 4 [AD] to the destruction of Israel", which could
indicate either AD74, when Jerusalem's Second Temple was destroyed, or
AD139, the date of a Jewish revolt violently put down by Rome.
5/1/9:
4/28/9:
4/26/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists:
Brian Simmons -
Full Preterism: A Building on Fire
(2009) "Within just two years, I have witnessed a spectacle truly
amazing. A theology which was formerly one of the great wonders of the
internet world has caught fire, and is now burning to cinders.. When did
this conflagration start? It began in 2006, when Todd Dennis, curator of
PreteristArchive.com, announced his rejection of the Hyper-Preterist
position. Almost immediately the solidarity of the movement showed signs
of weakening. A furious wave of attack was launched against Todd and
others who began defecting from the Hyper-Preterist scene."/ (it seems
like such a long time ago now... it is a shame that the reaction to
challenges from peers is so often 'attack' instead of 'explore'.)
4/24/9:
4/19/9:
4/18/9:
-
Free Online Books:
Elder Charles Taylor (Primitive Baptist)
A Commentary
on Revelation (1996)
"The author moves forward from the foundational position
that John was inspired to write the Revelation prior to the destruction of
Jerusalem by Roman legions in 70 A.D. This is an equally tenable position as
that held by most people who place John’s writing after 90 A.D. In fact, in
many aspects it is a more tenable position. (Refer to the article, "Tenable
dates of John’s writing Revelation," page vii). Based upon that interpretive
foundation, the mystery of the figurative language opens up like a flower
after a refreshing Spring rain. "
-
Apocalypse:
G.K. Beale Audio Series on the Apocalypse (thanks to ad70.org for
link)
4/16/9:
4/15/9:
4/14/9:
4/13/9:
-
Roderick Edwards: A
Review and Response to WSTTB (2009)
"Since 2004, hyperpreterists have sought to
respond to the response but as of
yet the hyperpreterists have been
unsuccessful in not only publishing
a response but even in getting
together in enough unity to write a
response. At this present time,
there are at least 3 separate teams
by hyperpreterists that seek to
publish a response."
-
Dee Dee Warren
on "The Bible Answer Man" in 2004 "They are extraordinarily
obsessive and so many people, Hank, are getting swallowed whole by this
particular heresy. I personally struggled with it to the point of almost
renouncing my faith. I know other people that have. I honestly believe
Hank that you're in such a position that God could have raised you up to
save people from this error, and I'm just praying for you in this
endeavor."
4/12/9:
4/10/9:
-
Critical:
Regarding the Preterist Error
(2009) "The individual in question is a “partial preterist,” who
believes that all Bible prophecy has been fulfilled except the return of
Christ with immediate judgement and bodily resurrection. That does
separates him from the “hyper-preterist” position often described in the
anti-preterist’s blog, and makes a world of difference between Christian
and heretic. Yet I must agree that the same hermeneutical error, of
spiritualizing the Bible to mean whatever one wants it to mean, is
behind both forms of preterism. When we leave the path of solid biblical
interpretation, we might as well just throw out the Bible since it has
no objective meaning."
4/7/9:
-
Critical:
Scot McKnight the Full Preterist (2009)
"Scot
makes 70 AD the focal point of not only many of Jesus’ prophecies,
but the eternal things that He spoke of
as well. That is the point
where I feel Scot crosses the line into full preterism and unorthodoxy.
Yet Scot still concedes that not everything is fulfilled which really
puzzles me. How can someone believe that Matthew 25:31-46 has been
fulfilled?Or is Scot saying that this is not part of the eternal
things? That would make even less sense. The section above remains
unchanged in his recently published series so he obviously still
believes this doctrine of full preterism, but this following quote from
the original has been changed."
4/5/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists:
Brian Simmons:
Why
Christ didn't return in AD70
(2009) "The
unconditional promises were never made under the Mosaic Covenant. They
were made under the Abrahamic covenant. This was demonstrated when
God, in ratifying the promised blessings, Himself passed through the
pieces of the sacrifice (Genesis 15: 17-18), showing
that the covenant would be secured by one contracting party alone. //
This failure of Israel to acknowledge John’s mission explains why his
baptism was still being administered twenty-six years after the
ascension of Christ (Acts 19: 3).. Now, if the nation
failed to acknowledge John Baptist as the “Elijah” of Malachi’s
prophecy, then it is absurd to claim that his mission was accomplished
in the first century. Malachi tells us that if the ministry was not
fulfilled, the land would be smitten with a curse. That is exactly what
Preterists say happened in A.D. 70. Therefore, they
cannot claim that John the Baptist fulfilled the role of Elijah
without contradicting themselves."
4/4/9:
3/29/9:
-
Brian Simmons:
How a Full Preterist Became a Dispensationalist
(2009) "That
later ages should have more insight on the issues than those who lived
through the events I soon recognized as an old error of the scholastics,
who make their living confuting the theories of their predecessors. It
is according to this rationale that the teachings of both evolutionism
and Higher Criticism function. Having identified
historicity as an important concern, and one not to be brushed aside, I
started studying the church fathers. It was a blessing
to find that Hyper-Preterist interpretations were
unknown to the early church. This knowledge was like a shot in the
arm."
-
Tertullian/666/Beast:
Ad Nationes and Nero - I,7,8 (197)
"This name of ours took its
rise in the reign of Augustus; under Tiberius it was taught with all
clearness and publicity; under Nero it was ruthlessly condemned, and you
may weigh its worth and character even from the person of its
persecutor. If that prince was a pious man, then the Christians are
impious; if he was just, if he was pure, then the Christians are unjust
and impure; if he was not a public enemy, we are enemies of our country:
what sort of men we are, our persecutor himself shows, since he of
course punished what produced hostility to himself.
Now, although every other institution
which existed under Nero has been destroyed, yet this of ours has firmly
remained----righteous, it would seem, as being unlike the author (of its
persecution)."
(Principe Augusto nomen hoc ortum est, Tiberio disciplina eius inluxit,
Nerone damnatio inualuit, ut iam hinc de persona persecutoris ponderetis
: si pius ille princeps, impii Christiani; si iustus, ¦si castus,
iniusti et incesti Christiani; si non hostis publicus, nos publici
hostes : quales simus, damnator ipse demonstrauit, utique aemula sibi
puniens.)
Ad Nationes and Nero - I,7,8
-
"Melito connected the rise of
Christianity with the development of the Roman Empire, and asserted
that only the bad emperors Nero and Domitian had persecuted
Christians.3 Tertullian borrowed the
idea and coined the phrase 'institutum Neronianum' to stigmatize
persecution."
-
"Persecution of the Christians
goes back to the time of Nero who was notorious for his character
defects. And to this day, 200 years after its origin, Christianity
is still subject to persecution. Let us consider the reliability of
these two Christian enemies -- Nero and rumor. Tongue in cheek,
Tertullian raises the question of whether Nero was just and pure.
The response of Nero’s contemporaries and historians ever after has
been a resounding "no."

"A giant picture of a bust of Roman Emperor Vespasian
is on display outside the Colosseum in Rome to highlight an exhibition being
held inside the Colosseum marking the 2,000th anniversary of the emperor's
birth. Construction of the Colosseum was started under Vespasian and
completed in 80 AD. The exhibition opens on Friday and goes through Jan. 10,
2010." (Domenico Stinellis / Associated Press) March 26, 2009
3/26/9:
- Hermeneutics:
James Enfrid:
The New Testament Writings
(1980) /
Front Cover
"One of the most important categories, if not THE most important
category, is that body of literature known as "apocalyptic." (p. 14)
-
Henning Reventlow:
Eschatology in the Bible and in Jewish and
Christian tradition (1997) This is the
fourth volume in the series of collaborations between the Department of
Bible in Tel Aviv University, Israel, and the Faculty of Theology in the
University of the Ruhr, Bochum, Germany. This symposium, held in Bochum
in 1995, discussed a topic important for both communities of believers,
starting with the Bible and tracking its role through the different
stages of the respective tradition-histories. This time the theme was
eschatology. The participants engaged in a lively discussion (from the
Jewish side) on messianism and Zionism, Qumran, Mishnah and Kabbalah,
and (from the Christian side) on the Bible, recent Protestant ethics and
systematic theology. The volume concludes with the report of a panel
discussion on the essence of eschatology in Jewish and Christian
thinking: is it a spiritualized idea or a material expectation for the
world?"
-
MP/
Gary
DeMar:
Left
Behind: Separating Fact from Fiction- Will Any Actually Be Left Behind?
(2009)
This is a brand new version of End Times Fiction featuring a new chapter on
'"The Remnant," updated statistics, and a larger easy-to-read format!
-
Paul L. Maier: “It started with
The Late Great Planet Earth and continues with the Left Behind
series, books on prophecy and the end-times that seem to hold the
public in thrall. Never mind that none of the things predicted in
these books will ever take place—except the Second Coming of
Christ—because they are based on faulty interpretations of
Scripture. In Left Behind: Separating Fact From Fiction, Gary
DeMar brilliantly skewers all the current pretentious prophecy
claims, showing how they have no biblical support, and returns
sanity to Christian hopes for the future.” —Paul L. Maier, Professor
of Ancient History, Western Michigan University, and bestselling
author of the novel Skeleton in God’s
Closet
Bill at
Covenant Radio
has guts for tearing down the idols of hyper preterism at his site and
on his show. Consider supporting him somehow. Perhaps
join the networking site,
CovenantRadio.ning
/ Covenant Radio has released a 7 minute audio statement on the
eschatological paradigm known as Hyper-Preterism. You can listen to
the .mp3 by clicking here
or by visiting
CovenantRadio.ning
-
William F. Hill, Jr.
-- born and raised a dispensational baptist for many years, Mr. Hill
came to the Reformed faith in 1995 and has never looked back. He is
currently the host of the
Reformed Theology Resource Center
one of the busiest and most visited Reformed sites on the web.
3/25/9:
-
Guardian.uk:
Israel caught red-handed using white phosphorous
"Israel's
military fired white phosphorus over crowded areas of
Gaza repeatedly and
indiscriminately in its three-week war, killing and injuring civilians
and committing war crimes, Human Rights Watch said today. In a
71-page report, the rights group said the repeated use of air-burst
white phosphorus artillery shells in populated areas of Gaza was not
incidental or accidental, but revealed "a pattern or policy of conduct"
3/24/9:
-
MP/Adams:
Pretblogging:
Jay Adams' Blog
-
Eschatology "If
you look carefully, you’ll see that the warnings that Christ’s kingdom
could come at any time, day or night, in their lifetime had to do with
the Destruction of Jerusalem rather than the second coming. And, of
course, it happened in that Generation, as Jesus said it would. They
were to look for it—but would not be told the exact time it would
occur."
-
Audio:
Former Full
Preterists:
Roderick Edwards appearing on Covenant Radio - "to discuss the
eschatological paradigm known as “hyper-preterism”. Mr . Edwards, a
former hyper-preterist is well versed in this topic and this will be a
good discussion dealing with the in’s and out’s of this system of
eschatology."
Covenant
Radio
3/23/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists:
Brian Simmons:
Up or Down? (2009)
"Preterists do not generally
recognize that Christ had already been exalted to the highest position
in the heavenlies at His ascension in A.D. 30. A look at New Testament
terminology confirms this. ..and so these verses tell us that Christ is
now seated in the “above heavens,” exalted above the highest
aristocracy of glory — not merely angels, but principalities and powers
(Eph. 1: 20-22; 1 Peter 3: 22). If
we take this exaltation as having been achieved in A.D. 30, then it is
clear that upon His ascension there was no place higher for Him to go. "
-
Hot
dog not licensed as kosher incites rage at diner "The popular spot
on 13th Avenue was shut down for several days as rabbis examined the
premises for non-Kosher food, and threw out equipment that came in
contact with the uncertified meat.. The restaurant's owner says that, in
addition to throwing out equipment, utensils were cleansed with a flame
to purge any pieces of the non-Kosher food."
-
Jeremy Swist:
Calm down, the sky is not falling (2009) "Faith in a world to come
is a death wish for the present one. Since the dawn of Christendom, each
generation believed theirs would be the last. All have pointed to the
Book of Revelation, a bizarre fantasy filled with dragons and crowns.
Likely, it was a metaphor for the fall of Rome, cloaked in symbols by a
subversive Greek. Yet a Time Magazine poll warns that 59 percent of the
electorate still takes Revelation seriously, handing the reins of empire
to those who would hasten its fulfillment."
3/21/9:
3/20/9:
-
Soldier says rabbis pushed "religious war" in Gaza
(2009) "Rabbis in the Israeli army told battlefield troops in January's
Gaza offensive they were fighting a "religious war" against gentiles,
according to one army commander's account published on Friday.
"Their message was very clear: we are the Jewish people, we came to this
land by a miracle, God brought us back to this land and now we need to
fight to expel the gentiles who are interfering with our conquest of
this holy land," he said"
-
Free Online Books/MP:
Daniel Whitby (Developed Systematic
Postmillennialism):
Additional Annotations to the New Testament
(1710) With Seven Discourses; and an
Appendix Entituled Examen Variantium Lectionum Johannis Millii, S.T.P.
in Novum Testamentum /
The Treatifes
added to this Addition are these:
-
A Differtation
concerning the Baptism of Infants, on Matth. xxviii. 19. p. 15.
-
An Answer to Mr.
Whifton's Difcourfe, on Matth. xxiv. p. 25.
-
An Examination of his
Difcourfe concerning Abiathar the High Priest, on Mark ii. 36.
-
A Difcourfe concerning
the Imputation of Chrift's perfect Righteoufnefs to us for
Righteoufness or Juftification, p. 68
-
A Defence of a Paffage
in the Preface to the Epiflle to the Galatians.
-
A Difcourfe enquiring
whether the Apoftles, in their Writings, spake as conceiving
that the Day of Judgment might be in their Days, p. 113.
-
A Parallel
betwixt the Apoftacy of the Jewifh and the Papal Antichrift, p.
119.
3/19/9:
-
MP:
Mike F. Blume:
The
Demonic Possession of an Entire Generation
(2009) "So the
Jews of every generation since, regardless of their troubles, have never
been judged by God due to that act of the forefathers in the crucifixion
of Jesus, no matter what anybody has claimed. This is another reason
dispensationalism’s claim that blindness is upon national Israel to this
day due to the sins of their forefathers is simply not true. It can’t be
true according to Ezekiel 18.
"A lot of us were open enough to
walk away from the teachings of Dispensationalism and futurism, but we
ought to ensure we will always remain open for correction to the Lord.
"
-
On the Essene Hypothesis controversy stirring around the Internet
"This post contains links to all the blog posts that I have come across
regarding Rachel Elior and the Essenes."
For Garret per Q/A on how AD70 is only
a shadow to Jesus:
A "Preterist-Idealism" POV would recognize the "covenant shift" from old
to new elements/stoicheia as being focused on the personal
exodus out of sin and into ultimate aionian perfection promised
to those in Jesus Christ. This personal transition period from darkness to
Light conforms to the experiential history of probably every true disciple
of the Lord and has to do with the very real struggle that continues against
sin and death in the post AD70 world. This is opposed to the HyP
idea that the old elements/stoicheia were destroyed along with the
temple in Jerusalem (which fundamentally changes things by flipping shadow &
Substance into opposite positions). Futurism makes the same mistake of
chronological limitation.. except that its historical eschaton has not yet
come. Underlined text emphasizes the salvific work of Son and
Spirit in translating the redeemed from old to new:
Peter
J. Leithart:
"Paul expresses
amazement that the Galatians could return to the “weak and poor
elements” after being liberated by Christ (Galatians 4:9). But
were the elements always so weak and beggarly? It seems not. They were
powerful enough to enslave (4:3). To be sure, they enslaved children,
but that does take some power. Further, Paul describes the former life
of the Galatians as a life under (hupo) the stoicheia,
an expression that parallels Paul’s talk of enslavement under the law
(3:23) and under guardians and managers (4:2). Again, this
suggests that the stoicheia have some power.
Or, they did.
God sent His Son and then His Spirit to redeem from the
stoicheia and elevate us to sons (4:4-6). Paul is
drawing on the exodus story, placing the stoicheia and the law
in the position of defeated Pharaoh
[the representative of the power of
sin - td]. Once Pharaoh
was powerful; but after the plagues and the exodus he was “weak
and beggarly.” So too the “elements.” But this means, of course, that
the elements exercised some genuine power prior to the missions of
the Son and Spirit." (Weak
Elements)
The Eschaton
separating the old heavens and earth from the new is passable only through
the Door, Jesus Christ. This idea is expressed by Paul's declaration
that "if any be in Christ they are a new creation.. all things become new"
(II Cor. 5:17) Crossing a historical mark is not sufficient to
leave the elements behind and enter into the Messianic Age. One
must be "found worthy" to enter (Lk. 20:35). Conversely, those not in
the sheepfold are still weak children and are slaves to Pharaoh,
the King of Sin (Egypt). Once Preterism is replaced with Idealism
in Leithart's quote he perfectly describes this biblical worldview.
As an example, removing the 'd' at the end of the word exercise in
his final sentence reveals:
"But this means, of
course, that the elements exercise some genuine power prior to the
missions of the Son and Spirit." (This covenant blessing is only
available for those of the Covenant. I believe that making the
fulfillment of these things universal among all mankind is one of the
pathways into heresy naturally built into HyP; Futurism would probably do
the same with its eschaton, but it benefits from this being yet future,
allowing that body to maintain the posture of "earnest expectation" seen
(without fail, except for perhaps
Theophany) throughout Christian history ; HyP does not allow this
posture of faith, sense of nearness, nor earnest expectation for the blessed
hope.) Now try replacing 'sent' with 'sends': "God
sent His Son and then His Spirit to redeem from the stoicheia and
elevate us to sons (4:4-6)"
- call me anytime. TD
3/18/9:
-
HyP -
Critical:
Hyperpreterism: A Chronic Hysteresis (2009) "Hyperpreterism
truncates Revelation 20 into the first century and so denies a future
resurrection. The last few years have shown that many who hold this view
end up swallowing universalism and some even deny the faith..
Hyperpreterism results in an endless cycle - a chronic hysteresis
- and leaves little to spur us on to victory. The history of the Bible
does contain repeated patterns, but there is always a
progression from childhood to maturity. Our history will have an end,
and it will be glorious victory."
3/17/9:
3/16/9:
3/10/9:
-
Audio/Video/Critical:
Covenant Radio Release on Hyper-Preterism (2009) "It is the position
of Covenant Radio, including its host, that this paradigm of hyper
preterism needs to be called for what it is. It is a heterodox
movement and position. We realize that this will annoy some
people that are followers of this theological movement and that is
not the intention of this official statement. The intention is to
make clear to all the listeners and potential guests where Covenant
Radio sees this paradigm and why it is to be rejected as a viable
position eschatologically."
-
Response: "Yep, and I see the same
old lie about Noyes is still being served up. Disinformation. That
tactic won't work. Preterists are too smart. I love this bit of
idiocy: "We realize that this will annoy some people that are
followers of this theological movement and that is not the intention
of this official statement. The intention is to make clear to all
the listeners and potential guests where Covenant Radio sees this
paradigm and why it is to be rejected as a viable position
eschatologically." Translation: "We don't mean to annoy you
heretics, like Jason, who helped me build my webpage, and helped
promote Covenant Radio with good faith. We just want to be bigger
and more popular so that we have big names like Kenneth Gentry on
the show." (sam)
3/8/9:
-
So you think you know the Bible? (2009) "A great place to start
is Jordan's lecture series Garden of God. Once slightly
inebriated, you will progress to his lectures on Revelation,
which are a secret storeroom of single malt. If you claim to be a
preterist (of any description) and you haven't heard these, you
haven't seen the forest for the trees. David Chilton's The Days
of Vengeance gets downloaded from my site over 30 times a day
(add that up for three years!). It's a great commentary, but
Jordan's lectures use the Bible instead of Josephus to interpret
Revelation. Chilton was peeping through the keyhole. Jordan throws
open the door. These are cutting edge and, I believe, indispensable
for anyone with an interest in preterism."
3/7/9:
-
The Resurrection of the Dead (2009) "I
have a few preterist friends who take the resurrection as a “spiritual”
resurrection and that it already has taken place. They take this view in
part by viewing that Jesus already returned “spiritually” in 70ad. I do
consider myself as a partial preterist though I do not suppose that I
fully understand the view so in part will not address the full preterist
view directly. In the discussion though I want to look at what the Bible
states specifically about the “bodily” resurrection as well as look at
the early church fathers view on the topic."
-
Definition-of
Dictionary: Hypo-Preterism - "hypo-preterism
rate this definition: (Noun) the belief that the prophecies of the Bible
regarding the End of the World continue to be fulfilled today and in the
future and were not fulfilled during the destruction of Jerusalem in
A.D. 70. -- hypo-preterist, n..., adj. "
Pret Press:
Living
library gives people chance to 'borrow' experiences of others "Maseruka
continued to lean toward a version of Christianity called preterism,
which holds that the Bible's prediction of end times in the Book of
Revelation has already come to pass, bringing both good and bad to
Earth. "I think heaven and hell are already here," Maseruka said. "The
good thing is we have a choice where we want to live." He added he wants
to explore various schools of thought on the world around us, so he can
perfect his philosophy of life. It makes every day special for him.
"Daily I'm being reincarnated as a new being," Maseruka said."
3/5/9:
-
Vatican menorah called an urban myth
"It was myth busting time in Hamilton as Yeshiva University historian,
Dr. Stephen Fine, explained recently to an awestruck crowd filling the
home of Rabbi Aaron and Leslie Selevan that no, the menorah from the
Temple in Jerusalem is not being sequestered in the Vatican and that the
pyramids of Egypt had already been built – at least 400 years earlier –
by the time Joseph arrived and Moses led his people out. “But,” he
declared, “We did build the Coliseum in Rome.” Fine describes himself as
an archaeologist and artist in a world of rabbis at Yeshiva U."
3/4/9:
3/3/9:
2/26/9:
-
Jewish leaders blast Hillary Zuckerman, Lawmakers, Local Jews Say
Secretary Of State Not The Hillary Clinton They Used To Know "Hillary
had Mrs. Arafat here and she invited Mrs. Arafat for lunch when she was
the first lady," added Babak Chafe of Great Neck. "She is
pro-Palestinian 100 percent, really. Of course, we always knew it."
2/25/9:
2/23/9:
-
US plans $900 million for Gaza rebuild "The money, which needs U.S.
congressional approval, will be distributed through U.N. and other
bodies and not via the
militant group Hamas, which rules Gaza, said one official."
2/22/9:
2/18/9:
-
AD30 Preterism:
Was Pentecost the Regathering of Israel? (2009) "There is indeed an
regathering of Israel, but it has happened through the Church and can
only happen through the Church - as we have the word of the Apostles. It
is a regathering through the cross. Our Apostolic foundation of
epistles have already given us the correct interpretation as our
covenant and our day . The day of Pentecost, the
inauguration of the regathering as well as the ingathering of the
Gentiles, is the fulfillment of the promises made to Israel, and to the
Gentiles (Amos)."
2/15/9:
2/13/9:
-
Keith H. Meservy:
Jesus
and Josephus Told of The Destruction of Jerusalem
(2008) Provo, Utah: Maxwell Institute "The views expressed in this
article are the views of the author and do not represent the position of
the Maxwell Institute, Brigham Young University, or The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints." (Reprinted by permission from The New
Testament and the Latter-day Saints (Orem, Utah: Randall Book
Company, 1987), 195—218.)
2/11/9:
SPIEGEL: Are you actually
aware that you are dividing the Church with your extreme views?
Williamson: Only
violation of the dogmas, that is, the infallible principles, destroys
faith. The Second Vatican Council declared that it would proclaim no new
dogmas. Today the liberal bishops act as though it were some sort of
all-encompassing super-dogma, and they use it as justification for a
dictatorship of relativism. This contradicts the texts of the Council.
SPIEGEL: Your position on
Judaism is consistently anti-Semitic.
Williamson: St. Paul put
it this way: The Jews are beloved for the sake of Our Father, but our
enemies for the sake of the gospel.
SPIEGEL: Do you seriously
intend to use Catholic tradition and the Bible to justify your
anti-Semitism?
Williamson:
Anti-Semitism means many things today, for instance, when one criticizes
the Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip. The Church has always understood
the definition of anti-Semitism to be the rejection of Jews because of
their Jewish roots. This is condemned by the Church. Incidentally, this
is self-evident in a religion whose founders and all important
individuals in its early history were Jews. But it was also clear,
because of the large number of Jewish Christians in early Christianity,
that all men need Christ for their salvation -- all men, including the
Jews."
2/7/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists:
Brian Simmons:
Was Satan Really Destroyed in AD70?
(2009) "As Scriptures indicate, Satan was free during the entire 40-year
period that Hyper-Preterists call the Millennium. Let
us look at some key texts in their chronological order, and we’ll see
that all throughout this period, Satan was very much “in commission.”
2/4/9:
-
Preterist-Idealism:
Willibald
Beyschlag,
New Testament Theology
(1895)
"The common error.. of
conceiving the parousia as a single historical event instead of the
whole course of Christ's victory and triumph over the historical world,
dominates also the writer of the Apocalypse. But this error marks simply
the necessary limits of prophecy, which Paul describes in the words (1
Cor. xiii. 12): "Now we see (in our prophecy) through a glass in a
riddle, but then face to face." To see the things of the future face to
face is granted only to the after life ; to him who looks forward the
future appears only in the mirror of the present ; the symbol of the
future hovers before him in the signs of his time. Hence the conflict of
Christian history and the hope of eternal victory were to the writer of
the Apocalypse symbolically reflected in the confusions of his time ;
and if he saw close at hand the eternal triumph of the kingdom of God,
he simply erred in the same way as Isaiah or his greater post-Exilic
successor, the former of whom expected that the Assyrian oppression and
deliverance from it, and the latter that the Babylonian captivity and
deliverance, alone separated them from the Messianic salvation."
(This is a "must read" for anyone investigating
a hybrid preterist view of any sort)
-
Pastor G. Reckart:
Preterism: The Catholic Deception (2009) "We live in a time when
idiots claim interpretation of prophecy is not salvational. That each
person is entitled to believe what they want, even if it is all lies and
falsehood. That believing lies and falsehoods is not salvational. Yet of
this very event, Jesus warned not to be deceived. He warned of false
Christs, false prophets, who would deceive many. If these deceptions are
not false teachings, false doctrines, false interpretations: THEN WHAT
ARE THEY? And to say these are not salvational issues, is borderline
insanity. I will not fall for that liberal kool-aid."
2/2/9:
"Professor Crosby
is the victim of a system, which has taken him captive, and carries him
whithersoever it will. He follows it wherever he can see it; and when it
gets beyond his sight, he shuts his eyes, and still pursues it by the
scent and the sound of its flying foot-steps."
2/1/9:
1/31/9:
1/30/9:
-
C. H. Spurgeon:
Spurgeon's End Times
Words of Wisdom - "Here are a few jots and tittles on His
views on the end times. Here be some good and sane common sense! I find
myself saying amen to many of these
sentiments. Maybe he did over react a little to the ‘prophecy-extremes‘
in his day, and we could clearly do the same if we are not careful (I
also reacted to prophetic extremes by believing preterism for a
season)."
-
"Only fools and madmen are positive in their
interpretations of the Apocalypse."
-
"Guess not at the precise era for the destruction
of Antichrist; go and destroy it yourself, fighting against it every
day. But be looking forward and hastening unto the coming of the Son
of Man, and let this be at once your comfort and excitement to
diligence, that the Savior will soon come from Heaven."
1/29/9:
-
Free Online Books:
Dr. Karl August Auberlen:
Prophecies of
Daniel and the Revelation of St. John in Their Mutual Relation
(1856 PDF) Gabriel
drops for a moment the chronological connection (to resume it in ver.
27), and inserts here, with the general intimation, "after threescore
and two weeks," those leading events which were best calculated to
rectify that erroneous hope,—the death of the Messiah and the
destruction of Jerusalem. It is not hence to be inferred that these two
events should coincide exactly with the close of the sixty-second week.
We are told, on the contrary (ver. 25), that the coming of the Messiah
was to be at the end of the sixty-second week, which, therefore, could
not be marked also by His death. Nay, His death, as we shall see in
(ver. 27), is half a week after, and the destruction is much later
still. This last event is still indicated in the Messianic time as its
negative judicial side, just as Christ Himself represents the
destruction of Jerusalem as His Messianic coming (Matt. xvi. 28). "
1/28/9:
-
Cornelius Lapide Study Archive (On
Daniel's
Seventy Weeks prophecy) "The gospel
both is, and is called holy, because all the things which it
contains are pre-eminently holy. Holy is the birth of Christ by the Holy
Spirit, holy is His teaching, holy are His works, holy are His miracles,
holy His passion, resurrection and ascension, holy the sending of the
Holy Spirit. Daniel 9:24 alludes to this, where it is said that seventy
weeks of years must be fulfilled until Christ, that the saint of
saints (the holy of holies) may be anointed. That is to
say, by this book and in this gospel the prophecy of Daniel about the
coming of Christ, who is the holy of holies, is shown to be fulfilled."
(Introduction to Matthew)
-
Hyper Preterism:
I. Darling -
A New Commentary or Explanation of What is
Commonly Called the Revelations of St. John the Divine
- Adapted to Ordinary Minds; Showing the Fulfillment of Prophecies, in
Establishing the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, and Destroying the Idol Kingly
Government of Men (1849)
"The Writer is of the opinion that all prophesy has been
fulfilled, and that the visions of St John was a Revelation of the
fulfillment of what was before written by the Prophets."
(First Generation Full Preterist Commentary on Revelation!)


|
The Syriac Version of the Apocalypse | |
Murdock Syriac
(5th Century)
"The Revelation, which was made by God to John the Evangelist, in the island of Patmos, to which he was banished by Nero the Emperor." |
Etheridge Syriac (5th
Century)
THE REVELATION WHICH WAS MADE UNTO JUHANON THE EVANGELIST, FROM ALOHA, IN PATHAMON THE ISLAND, WHITHER HE HAD BEEN CAST BY NERO CAESAR. |
1/27/9:
-
C. Michael Patton:
Top Theological Pickup Lines NOT To Use (2008) “Looking at you makes
me reconsider preterism, because you are heaven on earth.” ("God may be
the bread of life, but you are the butter")
-
Free Online Books/Early
Date:
John Gwynn -
The Syriac Version of the Apocalypse (1897) "I
have endeavoured to lead to the conclusion that this Apocalypse is a
portion of the original "Philoxenian" New Testament, as translated A.D.
508, for Philoxenus of Mabug, by Polycarpus "the Chorepiscopus." I have
endeavoured to show, farther, that the other version of the Apocalypse,
first printed by De Dieu in 1627, is a revision of this, and belongs
probably to the Syriac New Testament of Thomas of Harkel, of A.D. 616."
// "I would remark, in passing, that the number 666 (Rev. xiiu 18) is
represented by Irenaeus (Proleg. v. 30, 1), on the authority of St. John
himself, to have been the name Lateinos (meaning the sixth Roman
Emperor, Nero, who was born in Latium), not Laetinos, as B. H. C. found
it." (T.J. Buckton)
-
Dartmouth Review: Rome and Jerusalem "Martin Goodman’s Rome and
Jerusalem: The Clash of Ancient Civilizations investigates the history
of the relationship between the Roman empire and the Jewish state and
seeks to trace the roots of Western attitudes towards the Jewish people
to the role played both culturally and politically by Jerusalem and its
culture in the formulation of a Christian Roman empire."
-
Universalism/Former Full
Preterists: Dorothy Anderson -
Preterist Universalism: Global or Local? (2009)
"(T)o
claim the White Throne Judgment is past and Satan is cast into the lake
of fire to no more deceive the nations along with ALL THOSE NOT WRITTEN
IN THE LAMB’s BOOK OF LIFE, is not consistent with an AD70 judgment
UNLESS universalism is the end result or the creation covenantal context
is correct."
1/24/9:
-
Free Online Books/Early
Date: James Glasgow:
The Apocalypse Translated and Expounded
(1872) - Early Dating Advocate, Sets at AD 51.
"Daniel's prophecy of the seventy weeks presents
an irrefragable proof that the whole of the New Testament, the
Apocalypse included, must have been written before the fall of Jerusalem
and the end of the Jewish kingdom." "When did the seventy weeks end ? No date later than that of the fall of Jerusalem (a.d. 70) can with any truth or plausibility be supposed, for these weeks were "determined on the holy city." But many say they ended earlier, — at the death of Christ. Against this, however, in the above, and some other particulars, there lie weighty objections, as Scaliger, Hales, and others have shown. Let us look at the objects which were to be accomplished before these weeks ran out. "
// "Many of the visions and
words of the prophets are still receiving fulfilment ; and not
until the end of the gospel age is all prophecy fulfilled.
Some were fulfilled at the death of Christ, some in the fall
of the city and dispersion of the people, and some in the progressive influx of the Gentiles ; while many regarding Gentiles
and outcast Jews are yet to pass into fulfilment."
-
Free Online Books: HP:
Arthur T. Pierson -
Many Infallible Proofs
(1886) "In this prophecy, there is no vague general
prediction; but a startling array of minute particulars. Our Lord draws the portrait of the
coming event in detail; time, place, persons,
marked circumstances, all introducing peculiar
features which leave no doubt as to our power to
recognize the event, if it shall look like its portrait. We find some twenty-five distinct predictions, here, and, on the law of compound probability, the chance of their all meeting in one
event, is as one in nearly twenty millions i. e.
the fraction that represents the chance of probability is one-half raised to its twenty-fourth
power or about one twenty millionth chance!"
"Vindicta salcatoris - me Vengeaunce of Goddes deth or
Bataile of Jerusalem"
1/23/9:
-
Ben Johnson:
The Parable of the Wicked Tenants in Context: Jesus’ Interpretation of
the Song of the Vineyard in the Light of Second Temple Jewish Parallels
(2009) "The Parable of the Wicked Tenants (Mk. 12:1-9/Mt. 21:33-46/Lk.
20:9-19; also GThom 65-66) is one of the most important and
most variedly interpreted parables in the New Testament. Many
commentators suggest that the only plausibly historical way of
interpreting this parable is to strip it from its synoptic context (in
the midst of Jesus’ Temple controversy) and to remove from it its
reference to Isa. 5:1-7 which forces an allegorical interpretation of
it. I suggest, however, that if we are looking for an historically
plausible Jesus, then we are looking for one who both fits plausibly
within the Judaism of his day, and yet is controversial enough within
that Judaism to have been crucified and founded a community which later
broke with that Judaism."
-
Whitefield Theological
Seminary President Dr. Kenneth Talbot clarifies stance on Hyper
Preterism "WTS publically states that our Seminary holds to the
Westminster Confession of Faith 1647, that it would be impossible for us
to support Full (Hyper) Preterism. We have a published statement in our
Confession that clearly opposes any theological views held by Full
(Hyper) Preterism. That is what confessionalism is all about. You have
the official statement from WTS as given by its President."
1/22/9:
-
Obama urges Israel to open Gaza borders
"The plea came in a speech that signalled the new US administration’s
shift from Bush-era policy on the Middle East and the world as a whole.
In a high-profile address on his second day in office, just hours after
he signed an executive order to close the centre at Guantánamo Bay, Mr
Obama proclaimed that the US would “actively and aggressively seek a
lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians” in the wake of this
month’s Gaza war."
1/21/9:
-
Obama's first call "was to President Abbas" Robert Gibbs, the White
House press secretary, said that the talks with Middle East leaders
underlined a “commitment to active engagement in pursuit of Arab-Israeli
peace from the beginning of his term”. He added: “In the aftermath of
the Gaza conflict, he emphasised his determination to work to help
consolidate the ceasefire by establishing an effective anti-smuggling
regime to prevent Hamas from rearming, and facilitating, in partnership
with the Palestinian Authority, a major reconstruction effort.”
-
NYT:
For Obama, Choice Is Unified Palestinian Government or an Isolated Hamas
1/18/9:
TWO EARLY MODERN PRETERIST
BOOKS!
-
Free Online Books:
Johann Gottfried von Herder -
Mara-natha, das Buch von der Zukunft des Herrn,
des Neuen Testaments Siegel
[Maran-atha; the Book of the Coming of the Lord: the Seal of the New
Testament.] (1799 German PDF) "The
historical perspective of this book is, like that of Abauzit, barren and
contracted in the extreme: it consists of Jerusalem and the Jewish war.
The formal treatment of the Apocalyptic theme, on the contrary, is
enthusiastic, full of idealization, and appreciation of the figurative
language of the Orient (see Lucke's commendation). Herder called the
Apocalypse : "A picture-book, setting forth the rise, the visible
existence, and the future of Christ's Kingdom in figures and similitudes
of His first Coming, to terrify and to console." (Lange)
-
Free Online Books:
Firmin Abauzit:
Discours Historique Sur L' Apocalypse (1770
French PDF) "Abauzit left behind him some
writings, chiefly theological. Of these the principal was, an "Essay
upon the Apocalypse," written to show that the canonical authority of
the book of Revelation was doubtful, and to apply the predictions to the
destruction of Jerusalem. This work was sent by the author to Dr. Twells,
in London, who translated it from French into English, and added a
refutation, - with which Abauzit was so well satisfied, that he desired
his friend in Holland to stop an intended impression." (Lange)
1/15/9:
-
dEmEnTiA:
Bill Bramwell:
Answering Pat
Robertson/Hal Lindsey-Christian Zionism (2009) "One of the strangest
teachings from proponents of dispensationalism is the assertion that the
ancient Jewish temple will be rebuilt. It is understandable why some
extremely conservative Orthodox Jews would desire to have a rebuilt
temple, but logically it makes little sense why so many Christians are
clamoring to see a third temple. Last week, Hal Lindsey wrote an excited
column at WorldNetDaily titled “Revived
Sanhedrin discusses temple” where he
cites evidence of plans for a renewed temple in Israel. While Mr.
Lindsey is a fine Christian and no doubt has done many good things for
Christianity, his theological views on the “end-times” which he has been
teaching for years are, I believe, full of errors and pose both
theological and political concerns."
-
William Thrasher:
Parable of the fig tree (2009 St. Claire Times) "What is the lesson
of the fig tree? First, it warns that just as it seems — that though
things are going well and all will be well, don’t be comfortable, for
destruction is at the door. Jesus further says that the current
generation of Jews would see the destruction. That doesn’t mean
that everyone alive at the time Jesus spoke these words would see the
temple destroyed, but the destruction would happen within the lifespan
of some of those who were alive when He spoke the words. "

1/13/9:
-
DNA Could Illuminate Origins of Medieval Manuscripts "Medieval
manuscript identification could be a tough sell in today's economy, but
Stinson believes that historical insight is still valuable. He gave the
example of an undated poem he's currently translating, about the Roman
destruction of Jerusalem. The poem, said Stinson, reflects anti-Semitic
tendencies common in parts of medieval England. "
-
MP :
Gary DeMar:
A Defense of Dispensationalism
(2009) The same “hyper” argument can be applied to Calvinism. Seeing
that MacArthur is a Calvinist, I can just hear some of his Arminian
friends saying, “It is clear that the hermeneutical approach taken by
Calvinists like John MacArthur is what laid the foundation for the
hyper-Calvinism error.” Amillennialist David Engelsma, also a preterist
critic, follows a similar slippery slope argument. Engelsma writes that
partial “preterism will become consistent preterism.”[3] This
is curious coming from Engelsma since he defends Calvinism against those
who maintain that Calvinism inevitably leads to hyper-Calvinism or that
Calvinism is in fact hyper-Calvinism. He writes in Hyper-Calvinism
and the Call of the Gospel,
In most cases the charge
“hyper-Calvinist” is nothing but a deceptive attack upon Calvinism
itself. Someone who hates Calvinism, or the uncompromising, consistent
defense of Calvinism; yet he hesitates to attack Calvinism openly and
forthrightly, and therefore he disguises his attack as an attack on
“hyper-Calvinism” and “hyper-Calvinists.”[4]
This is exactly what Engelsma
does in his attack on preterism. Instead of dealing with the detailed
arguments of preterists, he immediately attacks hyper-preterism as if
partial and hyper-preterism are synonymous. Let’s modify the
hyper-Calvinist paragraph above by substituting hyper-preterist for
hyper-Calvinist.
In
most cases the charge “hyper-preterist” is nothing but a deceptive
attack upon preterism itself. Someone who hates preterism, or the
uncompromising, consistent defense of preterism; yet he hesitates to
attack preterism openly and forthrightly, and therefore he disguises his
attack as an attack on “hyper-preterism” and “hyper-preterists.”
1/10/9:
-
Former Full
Preterists:
Todd Dennis:
Hyper Preterism's AD70 Focal Point is
Fundamentally Different From Christianity's Focal Point of the Cross
(2009) "When the life of Jesus was draining away on the cross, He
Himself noted that the redemptive work had been accomplished, in saying
"it is finished". Finished (Tetelestai, from the verb
teleo) means “to complete, to accomplish". Though some HyPs
may try to diminish the meaning of the cross and Jesus' declaration
prior to His sacrificial death (which diminishment in itself serves as a
litmus test for error), it was of the utmost significance. In fact, in
order to maintain continuity with Christianity, it must remain the
central focus. To diminish the centrality of the cross for redemptive
accomplishment is to fundamentally alter the message that has been
handed down and delivered throughout all generations. To diminish the
cross event is not just a small matter of end times disagreement;
Rather, it is an attack on the very foundations of Christianity."
1/9/9:
Articles Moved in from Pretblog:
 |
 |
| Danny Scheie as
You, Nero |
Emperor Nero:
Playbill
News: Freed's You, Nero, a comdey that fiddles with history
(2009)
"Nero, the Emperor of Rome, has an epic public relations
problem. He summons Scribonius, last of the great tragedians, to write a
play that will turn public opinion in his favor when it is presented at
the Neronia Festival of the Arts. Although Scribonius is terrified of
displeasing the Emperor, who has the habit of torturing and/or killing
anyone who makes that mistake, he recognizes the opportunity to use the
power of art to turn Nero's life around. As the two men work through
each draft, Nero continually misinterprets Scribonius' meanings, finding
justifications for even more tyranny and murder. Scribonius' last
effort, having Nero portray himself in the play, backfires completely.
Intoxicated by his own creativity, Nero decides he doesn't need a
playwright at all — he's going to go onstage, unscripted, at the Neronia
Festival himself. And the Colosseum will never be the same."
1/8/9:
1/7/9:
Articles Moved in from Pretblog:
1/2/9:
-
Dorothy
Anderson:
Former Full
Preterist
-
Hyper Preterism for Dummies
(2009)
"It
is common to hear talk about leaving their Church families – due to
the conflict of their position or because they see too much error
being taught. (This adds to the problems for those who leave the
view because they have no Church support)"
-
The
Devil is in the Details
(2009) "My
position today is this: If they want to lay claim to the start of the
next reformation, they must have a prepared response here. Luther wasn’t
negligent in that area. Since their position requires a defeat of Satan,
inquiring minds want to know. Who or what is/was Satan that proves this
scripture is fulfilled?"
-
Re-Shuffling the Creed Deck
(2009)
"What has happened in hyper-preterism is their eschatological (end
times) position requires them to redefine, or at best reschedule the
resurrection and after 25+ years, they still have no unified
solution to offer. You would think that would give them a clue that
maybe they have a real problem. Instead, they are still arguing over
what the resurrection represents. So their supposed answer to
eschatology has resulted in a major creedal failure."
-
Freiderich Engels and Early Christianity (2009) "At this time,
circa 69 AD, the entire Mediterranean world much of the of Near East
and Western Europe were under the control of the Roman Empire. This
was a multicultural empire made of hundreds of tribes, groups,
cities and peoples. Within the empire was a vast underclass of
workers, freedmen, slaves and peasants whose exploited labor was
lived off of by a ruling class of landed aristocrats and merchants.
In 69 AD the empire was in essence a military dictatorship
controlled by the army and led by the Emperor (from the Latin word
for “general”– imperator)."
-
Israel kills top Hamas figure |
Olmert
'iron fist' |
Hamas vows suicide attacks on 'Zionists everywhere'... |
'Day of Wrath' |
Tank Crews on Border Await Order to Move In
1/1/9:
-
Joe Ortiz:
The End Times
Passover (2006) "Even more disconcerting is the pervasive and
incessant promulgation of these left behind mythologies that permeate
the Christian publishing and video markets of today, which are deluding
millions of Christians into a false sense of security, motivated more so
by profit and temporal fame. The author makes no apologies to these
writers and preachers in regards to this matter. While there exists much
love by the author for all those who claim to speak God's gospel truth
about who is taken and who is left, claiming that those taken are
Christians and those left behind are the heathen, it is inexcusable to
persist in this folly when the word of God clearly states His children
of promise are left (Gr. aphiemi, forgiven) alone, passed over, when He
returns with great wrath!"
-
Dave MacPherson Review
"Because of recently uncovered data that had been forgotten or
covered up for more than a century, the Christian public now knows that
the famous (or infamous) pretribulation rapturescape is actually only
178 years old, that John Darby (long credited wrongfully with either
pretrib rapture origination or its basic development) wasn't original on
any aspect of pretrib dispensationalism, and that pretrib rapturism
since its birth in 1830 has been utterly riddled with dishonesty
(rampant plagiarism, the subtle changing of primary documents, the
deliberate cover-up of contexts in Biblical passages, the flaunting of
non-existent or non-accredited academic degrees, etc.)"
-
Gaza rockets put Israel’s nuclear plant in battle zone
There were growing fears in Israel last night that Hamas
missiles could threaten its top-secret nuclear facility at Dimona.
Rocket attacks from Gaza have forced Israelis to flee in ever greater
numbers and military chiefs have been shaken by the size and
sophistication of the militant group’s arsenal.
WHATSNEW
1996-97-98-99-00-01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
||
GUESTBOOK |
ARTCHIVE
|
Administrative:
Simple Classification and Color Schemes Given to Distinguish Between Forms
of Fulfillment Eschatology:
|
Futurism (F) - (No Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 & Revelation in 1st
C. - Types of Future Events Only) | | |
|
Historical Preterism
(HP) -
(Minor
Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation in Past) |
| |
|
Modern Preterism (MP) -
(Major Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation
in Past) | | |
 |
Hyper Preterism
(HyP)
- (Absolute Fulfillment of all Bible prophecy - Full Preterism
and "Resurrection Past" Teachings; Full Preterism is
systematized Hyper Preterism - All Full Preterism is Hyper
Preterism, but not all Hyper Preterism is Full Preterism.) |
Free Online Books
Is the wholesale overthrow of historical Christianity in
HyP inherently liberal-minded ?
Former Full Preterist Vince Krivda:
Typological Illustration of My Eschatological View (2009) "I
recently announced that I have supplemented my eschatological view. This
is an introductory survey my view, but by no means the whole picture. I
do not attempt to persuade anyone, nor endeavor to formulate a radically
new system. There are many points that I have not included here. I will
address them as the Lord permits over the next few months. The themes I
will address as I get the time may include Covenant Theology, the curse
and total depravity, definite atonement, redemption of the curse, etc.
These themes among others were what prompted me to reconsider my
eschatological views."
Comments: Vince K. "I would
go back to FP if I am directed there by Scripture, but once the mind
expanded, it can never go back to its original form. That is was true of my
embrace of FP, and it is also true of my new position."
Charles Schultz Says:
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."
Significance of A.D. 70 |
Significance of A.D. 30
The Best Eschatology is a
Proper Christology
Progressive Eschatology: "English
Christians burning churches, defacing tombs and graves of the death,
destroying the monuments of Christianity, and in fine cutting the throats of
English Christians, all the while that they were ruining the whore of Babel,
and cutting antichrist's throat." - Herbert Thorndike, first generation
Modern Preterist, opposing the Historicist systems of Protestant England -
"He asserted that the main scope and drift of the Apocalypse was to foretell
the conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity, the climax being reached
with the coming of Constantine, followed by the Millennium (interpreted in a
spiritual sense)" David Brady
Rabbi Ari Enkin "It is customary
recite a preliminary chapter of Tehillim before reciting the birkat hamazon
after meals. On weekdays, the general custom is to recite chapter 137, "Al
Naharot Bavel", which is intended to remind us of the destruction of
Jerusalem and the current exile. The Zohar states that one who derives
pleasure from bread and enjoys the taste of foods is required to remember
the Holy Land and the Beit Hamikdash after every meal. On
Shabbat, and other festive days when such sobering thoughts are not
appropriate, chapter 126, "Shir Hama'alot", is recited instead which speaks
about the future redemption. Some also recite "Shir Hama'alot" when in
the presence of a special guest. These Tehillim should be recited before
washing one's hands at the end of the meal ("mayim achronim")."
Eusebius on Rome as "Babylon" "Clement
in the eighth book of his Hypotyposes gives this account, and with him
agrees the bishop of Hierapolis named Papias. And Peter makes mention of
Mark in his first epistle which they say that he wrote in Rome itself, as is
indicated by him, when he calls the city, by a figure, Babylon, as he does
in the following words: "The church that is at Babylon, elected together
with you, greets you; and so does Mark my son."
Ecclesiastical History
2.15.1-2)
Origen on the coming of Christ:
"He comes every day with great power to the mind of
the believer in the clouds of prophecy, that is, in the Scriptures of the
Prophets and the Apostles, who utter the word of God with a meaning above
human nature. Also we say that to those who understand He comes with great
glory, and that this is the mole seen in the second coming of the Word which
is to the perfect. And so it may be, that all which the three Evangelists
have said concerning Christ's coming, if carefully compared together and
thoroughly examined would be found to apply to His continual daily coming in
His body, which is the Church, of which coming He said in another place,
Hereafter shall you see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of the
power of God, and coming in the clouds of heaven, excepting those places in
which He promises that His last coming in His own person."
(Aquinas Catena Matt. 24:30)
"Our purpose in editing
the texts has been to present all the decrees of the councils and only
the decrees. For this reason some very important texts have had to be
omitted, for example the anathemas against Origen formerly
attributed (erroneously) to Constantinople II, or the charges
on which pope Honorius was condemned (as these relate to the acts, not
the decrees, of Constantinople III), or the profession of faith of pope
Hormisdas which was a condition of admittance required of the council
fathers at Constantinople IV, but does not appear to have been formally
approved by the council." (Decrees of the ecumenical councils,
1990)
Roger Pearse "Now I
was under the impression, rightly or wrongly, that the Council of
Constantinople held by Justinian had condemned Origenism, and
perhaps anathematised Origen himself, depending on some
text-critical questions. To pronounce a man anathema 300 years
after he died in the peace of the church, and died moreover from the
effects of torture in confessing Christ, would be morally wrong of
course."
MoGrace2u "TODAY is the day of salvation.
Judgment comes at the end of this life for those who fail to avail
themselves beforehand of what will save them from perdition - in that day
when they bow before the Lord. A real warning and a real hope gives a man a
real choice to make - now. Because now there is grace and mercy and
forgiveness and no condemnation to face for those who call upon the Lord."
The (New) History of Full Preterism (Part Two) (Big .WMV File) |
A
Dictionary of the Writers on the Prophecies (1835 PDF) |
Works Relating to Jews
in the New York Library (1914 PDF) | Fulfilled Prophecy Bibliography
| All PDF Book Files
Ken Gentry "I would also point out that I have re-titled
the Appendix on hyper-preterism in that I greatly expand my critique in
order to include exegetical as well as theological concerns regarding this
aberrant movement. Though this heterodox movement continues to grow, signs
are appearing that it may be coming apart at the seams. Their continual
patching of new material on the old garment is making matters worse. I hope
to loosen a few of its threads myself. "
Justin Martyr: "You know very well that Jerusalem was laid
waste just as it was prophesied. That it would be destroyed, and no
one allowed to live there, was promised through the prophet Isaiah in this
way: "Your land is desolate." Indeed you are aware that it is
guarded and no one is in it." (First Apology, 47.4-6)
Alexander Tilloch: "The
commentator Arethas,
who quotes Irenaeus' opinion, does not follow it. In his explanation
of the sixth seal he applies it to the destruction of Jerusalem ; and he
does so expressly on the authority of preceding interpreters." (Dissertations
introductory to the study and right understanding of the Apocalypse.
p. 9)
Eusebius
on Sunday worship: "Wherefore, being rejected of them
[the Jews], the Word [Christ] by the new covenant translated and transferred
the feast of the Sabbath to the dawn of light, and handed down to us a
likeness of the true rest: the saving and Lord’s and first day of light.”
(Commentary on the Psalms, Ps. 91 (Ps. 92 in A. V.),
in J. P. Migne, Patrologia Graeca, Vol. 23, col. 1169, author’s
translation.)
-
(On Psalm 45:6/xlvi. 5) “I think
that the Psalmist describes the morning assemblies in which we are
accustomed to convene throughout the world;”
(On Psalm 58:17/lix. 16) “By this
is prophetically signified the service which is performed very early and
every morning of the resurrection-day throughout the whole world.”
(Comm., in Montfaucon’s Collectio Nova Patrum, pp. 85,
195, 272.)
St. Irenaeus of
Lyons (On "the end of the times" as
fulfilled) "This then is the order
of the rule of our faith, and the foundation of the building, and the
stability of our conversation: God, the Father, not made, not material,
invisible; one God, the creator of all things: this is the first point of
our faith. The second point is: The Word of God, Son of God, Christ Jesus
our Lord, who was manifested to the prophets according to the form of their
prophesying and according to the method of the dispensation of the Father:
through whom all things were made; who also at the end of the times,
to complete and gather up all things, was made man among men, visible and
tangible, in order to abolish death and show forth life and produce a
community of union between God and man. And the third point is: The Holy
Spirit, through whom the prophets prophesied, and the fathers learned the
things of God, and the righteous were led forth into the way of
righteousness; and who in the end of the times was poured out in a
new way upon mankind in all the earth, renewing man unto God.." //
"To them that believe He is
as Father, for in the end of the times He opened up the covenant of
adoption; but to the Jews as Lord and Lawgiver, for in the intermediate
times, when man forgat God and departed and revolted from Him, He brought
them into subjection by the Law, that they might learn that they had for
Lord the maker and creator, who also gives the breath of life, and whom we
ought to worship day and night: and to the Gentiles as maker and creator and
almighty: and to all alike sustainer and nourisher and king and judge; for
none shall escape and be delivered from His judgment, neither Jew nor
Gentile, nor believer that has sinned, nor angel: but they who now reject
His goodness shall know His power in judgment, according to that which the
blessed apostle says: Not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee
to repentance; but according to thy hardness and impenitent heart thou
treasurest up for thyself wrath in the day of wrath and of the revelation of
the righteous judgment of God, who shall render to every man according to
his works." (The Proof of Apostolic Preaching, p. 76-77)
Dollinger "Thus, after a siege unparalleled in the
history of war, fell this noble city, the beloved Jerusalem, after it had
flourished, under the protection of Heaven, more than two thousand years.
The miserable citizens, who had not been carried away in chains, or
crucified around the walls of Jerusalem, wandered forlorn over their once
happy land. Their descendants, after a vain attempt, in the reign of Adrian,
to rebuild their city, were scattered amongst the nations of the earth,
where their children may, to this day, be seen, distinct from the nations
with whom they live. The seat of the Jewish religion had fallen; the city of
sacrifice had been destroyed; that implacable enemy of Christ, the sanhedrim,
had been annihilated; it had become evident, even to the most darkened eye,
that the time had arrived, in which the Church should spring forth, as the
young plant, from the dead seed of Judaism, and should, in a short time,
become the vast tree, spreading its branches over the whole earth."
WHATSNEW
1996-97-98-99-00-01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
||
GUESTBOOK |
ARTCHIVE

Sometimes you can judge a book by its cover
88 Reasons Why The
Rapture Is In 1988, Edgar Whisenant (1988)
The Coming Russian Invasion of Israel,
Thomas McCall (1974)
Was Hitler 'Him'?: Showing the Satanic
Overthrow of World Order, Albert Gay (1939)
The End Of The World As We Know It:
1998-2000, Patrick Kinsella (1998)
The Last Days: A Discourse on the Evil
Character of These Our Times, Proving Them to be The 'Perilous Times' and
the 'Last Day', Edward Irving (1828)
The 1980s: Countdown to Armageddon,
Hal Lindsey (1980)
Gorbachev! Has the Real Antichrist Come?,
Robert Faid (1988)
Saddam's Babylon The Great, Charles
Taylor (1988)
Johanan b. Zakkai
predicted Vespasian's elevation to the throne based upon his AD70
application of Isaiah 10:34 "And Lebanon shall fall by a mighty one"
Apocalypse of Abraham
"Behold I saw them running to them by way of four ascents and they
burned the Temple with fire, and they plundered the holy things that
were in it. And I said, "Eternal One, the people you received from me
are being robbed by the hordes of the heathen. They are killing some and
holding others as aliens, and they burned the Temple with fire and they
are stealing and destroying the beautiful things which are in it.
Eternal, Mighty One! If this is so, why now have you afflicted my heart
and why will it be so?" (II, 681-705)
3rd Century Midrash
traced to R. Levi: "Justice sprang up before the Holy One,
Blessed Be He, and said to Him, "Master of the world can it be said of
your glory, 'a creature of flesh and blood burned the Sanctuary? And can
an evil one boast of Your glory, saying, 'I burned the House of God'?
May a fire then descend from on heaven and burn him." God said to him,
'your plea is a valid one.' Then a fire descended from heaven, as it is
said (Lam 1:13)!" (LmR I, 13)
3rd Century Midrash
traced to R. Joshua ben Levi taunting the Romans: "If the fire
had not been sent from heaven to harm me, what could you have done
against me? If the fire had not been sent to do me in, would you have
been able to triumph over me? You have milled flour which was already
milled, you have killed a lion which was already dead, you have burned a
building which was already burned." (Var. in PesR 26)
R. Jose ben Halfta (second century) "The war of Ben Koziba lasted three and a half years."
(Seder Olam Rabba, ch. 13)
King James I (1588) "Of all the Scriptures, the bulk of reuelatioun is
maist meit for this our last age. Iudge yif this be not ye tyme quhairof
this place that have maid chois of doeth meane, and sa ye dew tyme for
the reueiling of this prophecie." (Ane fruitfull Meditatioun
contening ane plane and facill expositioun of ye 6m7m8m and 10 versis of
the 20 Chap. of the Reuelatioun, Edinburg, p. sig. Aiiir.)
John Nolland "Scholars have most commonly dated Matthew in the 80s or
the 90s. But this is not to any significant degree because they have
been able to identify in Matthew features that reflect what is definitely
known of a situation in the 80s and 90s. They regularly claim just one
fixed point: that Matthew reflects knowledge of the destruction of Jerusalem
and its temple in A.D.70. This knowledge is said to be reflected most
clearly in Mt. 22:7 and is sometimes claimed to be reflected in 23:36, 38
and 24:2. But while they are likely right to think that the present
form of Mt. 22:7 reflects the Jerusalem focus on the judgment materials of
chaps. 23 and 24 and to that degree is not an original feature of the
parable, there is no basis for going beyond this and claiming that Matthew
has written in light of what actually happened in A.D. 70.
Nothing in Matthew's language encourages this belief. At 24:1-2 I
grant that 'it is not inconceivable that an original prophecy by Jesus has
taken on some colouring from one or other crisis situation facing Jerusalem
in the subsequent period.' But there is actually no sign in Matthew of
colouring from the A.D. 70 events. In relation to what actually
happened in A.D. 70, there 'won't be left here [one] stone upon [another]
stone' in Mt. 24:2 is already an exaggeration." (The Gospel of Matthew, p.
14)
Preterist-Idealism:
"To see the things of the
future face to face is granted only to the after life ; to him
who looks forward, the future appears only in the mirror of the present ;
the symbol of the future hovers before him in the signs of his time.
Hence the conflict of Christian history and the hope of eternal victory
were to the writer of the Apocalypse symbolically reflected in the
confusions of his time ; and if he saw close at hand the eternal triumph
of the kingdom of God, he simply erred in the same way as Isaiah or his
greater post-Exilic successor, the former of whom expected that the
Assyrian oppression and deliverance from it, and the latter that the
Babylonian captivity and deliverance, alone separated them from the
Messianic salvation." (Willibald
Beyschlag,
New Testament Theology)
Steve Mason: "Since Josephus’s literary
art demonstrably involves changes of narrative voice, complexity of
character development, calculated repetition of charged language, variation
of diction, and diversionary excursus, it seems impossible to devise
criteria based on such phenomena for extracting sources. Attempting such
recovery would require a sort of literary Heimlich maneuver, performed on
someone who has long since digested the item being sought. The result is
likely to be neither appealing nor useful." (Josephus and Christian Origins,
38)
G.H. Van Kooten:
"The only comparable independent
patristic information (on the dating of Revelation) seems to be provided
by Clement of Alexandria, according to whom 'on the tyrant's death, he
[i.e. John] returned to Ephesus from the isle of Patmos' (What Rich Man
Can Be Saved? 42). Clement, however, does not specify this
tyrant's identity, and it is only Eusebius who, when quoting Clement,
assumes, in the light of Irenaeus' claims, that this tyrant is Domitian
(Church History, 3.23.5). Clement himself appears to apply the
contents of Daniel's prophecies, which also resonate in Revelation, to
the year of the four emperors in Stromata 1.21: 'Nero held sway, and in
the holy city Jerusalem placed the abomination: and.. he was taken away,
and Otho, and Galba, and Vitellius. And Vespasian rose to the
supreme power, and destroyed Jerusalem.'" (The
Year of the Four Emperors and the Revelation of John PDF)
The Contribution of British Writers Between 1560 and 1830 to the
Interpretation of Revelation 13.16-18 -
Chapter Five : 1649-1660 - Henry Hammond and the Preterist School of
Interpretation "This volume contained a brave but lonely attempt to
introduce the preterist interpretation of the Book of Revelation to
English soil. Hammond laid great stress on the opening words of
the Apocalypse in which the book is said to contain 'things which
must shortly come to pass.' .. But those who argued for the
preterist interpretation of the Book of Revelation.. were playing to
empty galleries, until at least the fourth decade of the nineteenth
century. Their views were anything but popular and those who
followed them could soon find themselves branded with the infamous mark
of the papal beast." Others who followed: Herbert Thorndike /
"author of an anonymous tract on the Millennium published in 1693 ("Millennianism
: or, Christ's Thousand Years Reign upon Earth, considered, in a
Familiar Letter to a Friend")" / Daniel Mace
"The prophetic gift was to cease within the limit of the seventy weeks, which ended with the fall of the once holy but ultimately devoted city. There can therefore be no just ground for ascribing to any books of the New Testament canon a later date than a.d. 70
" James Glasgow:
The Apocalypse Translated and Expounded
C. Michael Patton (2008) "It looks like I am getting some
flack from some passionate Preterists (full or hyper Preterist, not
partial preterists) who say I don’t give them a fair shake in The
Theology Program material.. Preterism is a funny thing. It is something
that causes quite a bit of passionate adherence, the degree to which
shows great imbalance. The reason why we don’t cover it in TTP is
because it is neither significant historically or contemporary. I know
that this might seem like an arrogant statement to those who hold this
position, but I feel I am qualified enough to make this assertion in
good conscience." (Why I Don't Teach Preterism)
Pere Villalba i Varneda "Neither should we forget, as a basic thesis of
Flavius Josephus himself, that opinion according to which it was God himself
who had vowed the downfall of Jerusalem (B, V, 19, 559; B, VI, 371, 411),
and that it was this same God who for a long time had destined it to the
flames (B, VI, 250), and that there also existed a premonition of its
undoing, which the Jews had not managed to understand with sufficient
justice (B, VI, 310-315)." (The Historical Method of Flavius Josephus, p.
18) Josephus: 'you
may perhaps recover when you have reconciled yourself with the deity who
destroyed you.' (Josephus, War 5.19)
Arethas (c.850 - 944) (On the
Early
Dating of Revelation) "For there were many, yea, a countless multitude from among the Jews, who
believed in Christ : as even they testify, who said to St Paul on his
arrival at Jerusalem : Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there
are which believe. (Acts xxi. 20.) And He who gave this revelation to the
Evangelist, declares, that these men shall not share the destruction
inflicted by the Romans. For the ruin brought by the Romans had not yet
fallen upon the Jews, when this Evangelist received these prophecies : and
he did not receive them at Jerusalem, but in Ionia near Ephesus. For after
the suffering of the Lord he remained only fourteen years at Jerusalem,
during which time the tabernacle of the mother of the Lord, which had
conceived this Divine offspring, was preserved in this temporal life, after
the suffering and resurrection of her incorruptible Son. For he continued
with her as with a mother committed to him by the Lord. For after her death
it is reported that he no longer chose to remain in Judaea, but passed over
to Ephesus, where, as we have said, this present Apocalypse also was
composed ; which is a revelation of future things, inasmuch as forty years
after the ascension of the Lord this tribulation came upon the Jews."
N.T. Wright - "You may be allowed to eat meat offered to idols, but you
cannot deny the future bodily resurrection and claim that denial as an
allowable Christian option." The Resurrection of the Son of
God, pg 331
Andrew Perriman -
"The polemical origins, continuing controversialism, and sectarian rhetoric
of Preterism make it a difficult movement to evaluate - and I have to admit,
my instinct is still to hold it somewhat at arm’s length."
Eusebius - "It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has fixed by
his own authority" [Acts 1:7]. It seems to me that [Jesus], as God and Lord,
delivered this succinct verdict not solely regarding the end of the world
but about all times, in order to discourage those who would dare attempt
such a futile undertaking." -
, Introduction to the
Chronicle, AD 325
Frédéric Godet "Jesus predicted the destruction of
Jerusalem, that is certain." (A Commentary on the Gospel of St. Luke, 1889, p. 412)
F.C. Cook "The coming of Christ shall not be an obscure one, confined to a
particular place, and signified from thence by report, but one visible to
the whole world. Surely this again is an intimation that the second coming
of Christ is not to be identified with any local event, such as the
destruction of Jerusalem."
Louis H. Feldman "As for the impiety of which Josephus accused (John of Gischala), it stems to some extent from the fact that John, like many
others, gave a favorable interpretation to the Scriptural prophecies,
whereas Josephus saw them as foretelling the ruin of Jerusalem" (Josephus,
the Bible and History, p. 234)
George Eldon Ladd
(On Hebrews 8:13) "The passage we have just cited from Hebrews says that
when there is forgiveness, there is no longer any offering for sin. The
forgiveness wrought by Christ renders invalid and obsolete the Mosaic
system. Hebrews asserts the same truth in 8:13: “In speaking of a new
covenant, he treats the first as obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and
growing old is ready to vanish away.” Whether or not these words refer to
the historical destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 A.D., they at
least affirm the dissolution of the old Mosaic order, because the new order
of redemptive reality has come." The Last Things (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans
Publishing Co., 1978), 27.
The Fall of the Temple :
A Study in the History of Dogma (1921 PDF)
PRETERISTARCHIVE.COM
KEY BOOK LINKS
Fulfilled Prophecy Bibliography
| All PDF Book Files Now in One Directory
ARTchive Churban

James Edson White -
The
Coming King (1911)
Google Books | Rare
Books at DTS |
Archive.org Book Search : Apocalypse
PRESS CLIPPINGS /
dEmEnTiA
Born-Again Bunkum - Australian Press "Visiting the US I once heard Reagan on a fundamentalist radio show chatting happily about the grim prognostications in the Book of Revelation, the arrival of the Antichrist and the imminent second coming and you couldn't help but wonder if he was the right man to have his finger on the button. For once Alzheimer's was a good thing for, by his second term, he seemed to have forgotten all about it.
"
STUDY ARCHIVE
PROCOPIUS. "'Among these [spoils] there were also the
vessels of the Jews, which Titus the son of Vespasian after the capture of
Jerusalem brought with some other things to Rome. Now a certain Jew,
beholding these things, and standing near one of the friends of the Emperor,
remarked : " It would be an inauspicious act, in my opinion, to have these
treasures carried into the palace at Constantinople. For they can be kept no
where but in that place, which Solomon, who was formerly king of the Jews,
assigned to them. On account of these very things the palace of the Romans
was formerly plundered by Genseric, and now that of the Vandals by the Roman
army." These words being reported to the Emperor, excited his fears : and he
instantly sent them all to the Christian churches in Jerusalem.'
Thomas Whittemore "Some recent authors have expressed much surprise, that Universalists of the present day should apply so many passages of the New Testament to the destruction of Jerusalem. To name no other, Rev. Parsons Cooke speaks ' of the credulity of those who embrace the system of Universalism,' in believing' that so large a part of the Bible should relate to the destruction of Jerusalem. "If ever I succeeded,' says he,' in digesting the monstrous absurdity, I would be honest enough to call things by right names, and label the New Testament, "JERUSALEM'S DESTRUCTION FORETOLD.'" (Notes on Parables, p. 316)
Matthew Poole "A prediction, as some think, of that dreadful destruction which within a few years came, by the Romans, upon the whole Jewish nation. Whether it be to be understood of the judgment common to all unbelievers, all that know not God, and obey not the gospel of Christ, or of the particular destruction of this nation of the Jews, I shall not determine, though I rather judge the latter probable." (Matthew 3:10, Annot. in loc)
Tomson's Beza "Christ, by setting before them the example of the uncircumcised centurion, and yet of an excellent faith, provoketh the Jews to emulation, and together forewarneth them of their casting off, and the calling of the Gentiles." (Matthew 8:5, Note in loc)
Bate
"We will suppose, then, the rich man, who fared so sumptuously, to be the Jew, so amply enriched with the heavenly treasure of divine revelation. The poor beggar who lay at his gate, in so miserable a plight, was the poor Gentile, now reduced to the last degree of want, in regard to religious knowledge. The crumbs which fell from the rich man's table, and which the beggar was so desirous of picking up, were such fragments of patriarchal and Jewish traditions, as their travelling philosophers were able to pick up with their utmost care and diligence. And those philosophers were also the dogs that licked the sores of heathenism, and endeavored to supply the wants of divine revelation, by such schemes and hypotheses, concerning the nature of the gods, and the obligation of moral duties, as (due allowance for their ignorance and frailties) did no Email honor to human nature, and yet thereby plainly showed, how little a way unassisted reason could go, without some supernatural help, as one of the wisest of them frankly confessed. About one and the same time, the beggar dies, and is carried by the angels (i. e., God's spiritual messengers to mankind,) into Abraham's bosom; that is, he is engrafted into the church of God. And the rich man also dies and is buried. He dies what we call a political death. His dispensation ceases. He is rejected from being any longer the peculiar son of God. The people whom he parabolically represents, are miserably destroyed by the Romans, and the wretched remains of them, driven into exile over the face of the earth, were vagabonds, with a kind of mark set upon them, like Cain, their prototype, for a like crime ; and which mark may perhaps be their adherence to the law. Whereby it came amazingly to pass, that these people, though dispersed, yet still dwell alone and separate, not being reckoned among the nations, as Balaam foretold. The rich man, being reduced to this state of misery, complains bitterly of his hard fate, but is told by Abraham, that he slipped his opportunity, while Lazarus laid hold on his, and now receives the comfort of it. The Jew complains of the want of more evidence, to convince his countrymen, the five brethren and would fain have Lazarus sent from the dead to convert them. But Abraham tells him, that if their own scriptures cannot convince them of their error, neither would they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. And exactly so it proved in the event. For this parable was delivered towards the end of the third year of our Lord's ministry ; and in the fourth, or following year of it, the words put into the mouth of Abraham, as the conclusion of the parable, are most literally verified, by our Lord's raising another Lazarus from the dead. And we may presume, that the beggar 'had the fictitious name of Lazarus given him in the parable, not without some reason, since the supposed request of the rich man was fully answered, by our Lord's raising another, and a real Lazarus, from the dead. But what was the consequence ? Did this notorious miracle convince the rich man's brethren ? No, truly. His visit to them from the dead was so far from convincing them, that they actually consulted together, that they might put Lazarus also to death; because that, by reason of him, many of the Jews went away and believed on Jesus. So much for the true sense of this parable." (An Essay towards a Rationale of the literal Doctrine of Original Sin, a Vindication of God's Wisdom, Goodness, and Justice, in permitting the Fall of Adam, and the subsequent Corruption of Nature.' Published in 1752, and republished, much enlarged, in 1767.)
Thomas Brownell "Vessels of wrath ; viz., the unbelieving Jews, who for their wickedness and unbelief were the objects of God's wrath, and fitted for destruction ; meaning, as is most probable, for their destruction as a nation." (Romans 9:22, Expos. in loc. - A Bible Class and Family Expositor ; or a Familiar Guide to the study of the New Testament. Being a condensed Summary of the most valuable Commentaries ; compiled chiefly from a work of the Rev. George Holden, A. M. By THOMAS C. BROWNELL, D. D., LL.D. Bishop of the Diocese of Connecticut.' Hartford, 1823. 1 vol. 12mo. )
Under the imagery of the sixth seal is represented a great revolution in the state of religion ; and this clearly points to the reign of Constantine the great, when Christianity was fully established upon the ruins of paganism. Constantine was first proclaimed emperor A. D. 307 and died A. D. 337." (Expos. in loc.)
David Brewster
EDINBURGH, October 16, 1801. "
DEAR SIR,—I received yours, and shall endeavour, as far as I am able, to
explain the passage of Matthew which you have mentioned. It has long been a
dispute among divines whether or not all prophecies have double senses, that
is, refer to two events at the same time, and
a great many learned men have defended each side of the question. Now, if we
believe in the double senses of prophecy, it is easy to explain the whole
24th chapter of Matthew, by saying that it refers, in the first part, to the
destruction of Jerusalem, and in the last, to the
end of the world; but still a difficulty occurs in the 34th verse, where it
is said that this generation shall not pass away till all these things be
fulfilled. I do
not agree, however, with those who believe in the double sense of prophecy,
as it is contrary to that simplicity
which ought to be expected in the sacred writings, and would therefore
explain the chapter in a different manner, as referring wholly to the
destruction of Jerusalem,
In the 3d verse, the coming of Christ and the end of the world, (or rather,
the end of the age, as it is in the original), signifies nothing more than
that period when the Jewish Polity and State should be completely
overturned, and the Christian dispensation become more firmly established,
by the destruction of its enemies, and by the interposition of Christ in the
overthrow of Jerusalem. The prophecy in the 29th, 30th, and 31st verses,
which contain the greatest difficulty, appears to me to have been fulfilled
at the destruction of Jerusalem.
Christ might with sufficient propriety be said to come in the clouds of
heaven, in power and glory, when at that time the most wonderful appearances
in the heavens took place that were ever seen. The stars may with propriety
be said to fall from heaven, when lightnings
and great globes of fire destroyed the workmen appointed by the Emperor
Julian to rebuild Jerusalem; and, if I am not mistaken, the sun and moon
were
actually darkened at the overthrow of that city. All the tribes of the earth
might be said to mourn when so many thousands of Jews were slain in such a
cruel manner, and when they heard of the dreadful barbarities which were
committed upon them by the Romans. And the elect might properly be said to
be gathered together from all quarters of the heavens, when the Christian
religion, as it then actually did, extended itself rapidly over most
countries of the known world, and brought the glad tidings of salvation to
men of every description, nation, and language. This is the only consistent
explanation of the passage which I can give without any assistance.—I am,
yours sincerely, " DAVID BREWSTER." (The Home Life of David Brewster, p.
44,45)
Revelations of the Ancient World
Yahoo Group: Preterist Universalism "Because Preterist thought and Universal Reconciliation in the accomplished work of our Lord Jesus Christ go hand in hand in such a beautiful way! "
An Unauthorized Look at the Christians United for Israel Tour "Are you looking forward to Armageddon? I am!"
BibleProphecyFulfilled.org You can listen to "Bible Prophecy Fulfilled" on KGU 760am, on Saturday mornings at 11:00. Call in to join in the discussion. (808) 296-5467. That would be 2:00 pm PST in the spring, and 1:00 pm in the fall

1544 Josephus

Triumph of Titus, AD71
WHATSNEW
1996-97-98-99-00-01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
||
GUESTBOOK |
ARTCHIVE
Chiltons' Days of Vengeance Back in Print! |
The Last Days: Rethinking Bible Prophecy in the Light of History

Constantine the.. Pret!
Eusebius: "I am filled with wonder at the intellectual greatness of the emperor, who as if by divine inspiration thus expressed what the prophets had foretold concerning this monster"
BOOKS / SEARCHING...
Abauzit, Firmin (ob. 1767) - Essay on the Apocalypse, showing that the canonical authority of the book of Revelation was doubtful, and applying predictions to the destruction of Jerusalem. Translated from the French, by Dr. Twells. London.
-
Andreas, Caesariensis, Cappadocum Episcopus (cl. 500) - Commentarii in Apocalypsin ad Macarium, quos Latine vertit Theodorus Peltanus. Extant Gr. et Lat. ad finem Chrysostomi Commentariorum in S. Johannem in editione Morelliana, Tom. viii.
Arethas, Caesareae Cappadociae Archiepiscopus (cl. cir A.D. 540) Explicatio Apocalypseos. Veronae, 1532, fol. Extat etiam ad calcem Oecumenii. Paris 1631.
Burlington, J.N. "Destruction of Jerusalem" - 1807.
Butt, John Martin - The Revelation of St. John compared with itself, and the rest of Scripture ; The Divinity of the Apocalypse demonstrated by its fulfillment.
Burrows' (E.J.) Hours of Devoltion. Christian Disciple. 4:206
Clarke, Richard - A Discourse on the third day of the Gospel, compared with the seventh day of the Law. London 1794 -
Clericus, Joan. Veteris Testamenti Prophetae ab Esaia ad Malachiam usque, ex translatione Joannis Clerici ; cum ejusdem commentario philologico &c. Amst. 1731
Cocceius, Joh. Prof. of Hebrew at Leyden. Comm. in prophetica Jeremiae et Ezekielis Amst. 1669.
Collyer, Wm. Bengo, D.D. - Lectures on Scripture Prophecy. London 1811
Corrodi, Heinrich - A critical history of Chiliasm, or opinions respeecting the millennial reign of Christ. Zurich - First published anonymously in 1781.
Eichorn, Joh. Godf. - Commentarius in Apocalypsin Johannis. Gotting. 1791.
Faber, George Stanley. The Sacred Calendar of Prophecy. London 1828 (In this work, which is the last of Mr. Faber's of any importance, he abandons much of the interpretation which he had previously published)
Fehr, Sam. Benj. - An introduction to the right understanding and use of the Revelation of St. John (or rather of Jesus Christ) ; and as to what relates to the past, sufficiently illustrated from ecclesiastical and secular history. (Ger.) Altenburg, 1761.
Greenhill, Jos. A.M. Rector of East Horsley - An Essay on the prophecies of the New Testament which relate to the destruction of Jerusalem. Lodon. 1755.
Grotius, Hugo - Comm. ad loca quaedam Novi Test. Quae de Antichristo agunt aut agere putantur. Amst. 1640.
Lee, Samuel - Sermons and Dissertations. | Six sermons on the study of Holy Scriptures, their nature, interpretation, and some of their most important doctrines
Marshall, Benjamin, A Chronological Treatise upon the Seventy Weeks of Daniel 1725
Park, J.R. ; M.D. - An amicable controversy with a Jewish Rabbi on the Messiah's coming. 1832. ; A new exposition of the Apocalypse, so far as the prophecies are fulfilled ; to which are prefixed the history of Christianity epitomised. 1834.
Rainolds, John D.D. - A discourse on the destructio nof the Idumeans. 1584
Stockwood, John - A Sermon on the Destruction of Ierusalem - Printed by Tho. Dawson, 1584
Whiston, William - The Accomplishment of Scripture prophecies
Books you can find in the Certain Evangelical
Bookstores:
-
R.C. Sproul,
The Last Days According to Jesus (Grand
Rapids, Baker Book House)
-
Hank Hanegraaf,
The Last Disciple (Wheaton: Tyndale)
(This is historical fiction)
-
__.
The
Last Sacrifice (Wheaton: Tyndale) (This is
historical fiction)
-
__.
The
Apocalypse Code (Nashville: Thomas Nelson)
-
Gary Demar,
Last Days Madness (Atlanta: American
Vision)
-
__.
End
Times Fiction (Nashville: Thomas Nelson)
-
Loraine
Boettner, The Millennium (Philipsburg:
P&R)
-
Kim
Riddlebarge, The Case for Amillennialism
(Grand Rapids: Baker Book House)
-
Herman
Ridderbos, The Coming of the Kingdom
(Philipsburg: P&R)
James Stuart Russell
-
The Parousia
(1878)
Full
Preterist Millennium "violent and unnatural" "Some interpreters
indeed attempt to get over the difficulty by supposing that the
thousand years, being a symbolic number, may represent a period of
very short duration, and so bring the whole within the prescribed
apocalyptic limits; but this method of interpretation appears to us so violent and unnatural that we cannot hesitate to reject it.
" (p. 514)
Revelation
20:5-10 Still Unfulfilled "We
must consequently regard this prediction of the loosing of Satan,
and the events that follow, as still future, and therefore
unfulfilled." (p. 523)

The Coming of the Messiah (1802)
Josephus' "cloud coming" passage : "Before sunset were seen around the whole country chariots poised in the air, and armed battalions speeding through the clouds and investing the cities." - Traill's Josephus, page 197

The Coming of the Son of Man
Andrew Perriman: "I believe that there will be a final defeat of evil. There will be a resurrection of the dead; the dead will be ‘judged by what was written in the books, by what they had done’ (Rev.20:12); death will be destroyed; anyone who’s name is not written in the book of life will likewise be destroyed. There will be a new heaven and a new earth."



 Avalon Hill
"Siege of Jerusalem"
Board Game "therein lies the fascination: the immovable object vs the unstoppable force."
|