|
|

|
Charles Wellbeloved
1769-1858
A
biographical memoir of the Rev. Charles Wellbeloved (1860)
"Modern
criticism would probably pronounce that Hammond, and Nisbett,
and Cappe were right, in maintaining that the whole passage in
Matthew was spoken with reference to the destruction of
Jerusalem, whatever difficulty there may be in discovering in
the historical event a complete correspondence with all the
descriptive circumstances of the prediction. Criticism, however,
cannot admit the principle that there must be such a
correspondence, and that the interpretation which establishes it
must be true."
|
 |
Unitarian Minister and Educator | Co-Pastor with
Newcombe Cappe

Biography pp. 105-110
"It is mentioned in his biography that, when a student at
Northampton, he had entertained doubts of the truths of Christianity, and
had subjected its evidences to a most rigid scrutiny. Whether, even then, he
had shadowed out to himself the mode of interpretation which he afterwards
elaborated into a system, we are not told; but it was his firm conviction,
in which Mr. Wellbeloved shared, that only by such means could the Gospel be
defended against the objections of unbelievers. The most marked
peculiarity of this system was the interpretation given to that passage in
the Gospel of St. Matthew (xxv. v. 31-46), in which the second coming of our
Lord appears to be connected, on the one hand with the destruction of
Jerusalem, on the other hand with a general judgment and retribution.
The passage had been a serious difficulty to enlightened expositors, and a
handle to the enemies of Revelation. If a second coming of Christ in the
clouds of Heaven, to judge the world to bring the present system of things
to an end, and make an eternal separation between the righteous and the
wicked, had been really predicted, as an event to be witnessed by the
generation in which our Saviour lived (Matt. xvi. 28), it would be difficult
to escape the edge of Mr. Gibbon's sarcasm, who, in assigning the secondary
causes of the rapid diffusion of the Gospel says, " In the primitive church
the influence of truth was very powerfully strengthened by an opinion,
which, however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, has
not been found agreeable to experience. It was," he says, " universally
believed, that the end of the world and the kingdom of Heaven were at hand.
The near approach of this wonderful event had been predicted by the
Apostles; the tradition of it was preserved by their earliest disciples, and
those who understood, in their literal sense, the discourses of Christ
himself were obliged to expect the second and glorious coming of the Son of
Man in the clouds before that generation was totally extinguished which had
beheld his humble condition upon earth. The revolution of seventeen
centuries, however, has taught us not to press too closely the mysterious
language of prophecy and revelation."
The majority of interpreters admitted, what could not
indeed be well denied, that the predictions in Mark and Luke referred to the
destruction of Jerusalem, but thought that in Matthew predictions of the end
of the world and the general judgment were mixed together: the nearer event
being, in our Lord's mind, a type of the more remote. In opposition to these
views, Dr. Hammond, in his Commentary, had suggested that the whole of the
prophecy had reference solely to the destruction of Jerusalem; and the same
view had been maintained even more broadly by Mr. Nisbett, a Kentish
clergyman, in his " Attempt to illustrate Various Passages in the New
Testament," published in 1787.
In his view, the end of the world was only the end of the
age, the Jewish dispensation, brought to a close by the destruction of
Jerusalem ; the coming of the Son of Man in the clouds of Heaven was only
this signal manifestation of divine power, confirming the truth of his
predictions ; the darkening of the sun, the shaking of the powers of the
heavens, were a symbolical description of great political revolutions; the
angels who gather the elect, are the preachers of the Gospel, who gathered
believers into the church ; the salvation promised to faith was the safety
enjoyed by those who, believing the predictions of Christ, separated from
Judaism and escaped the destruction which fell on its obstinate adherents ;
the goats and the sheep were respectively the unbelievers and the believers;
the everlasting punishment of the one, the everlasting life of the other,
were the respective states of suffering or happiness which resulted from
unbelief or belief, in the aion, the age or dispensation of Christianity,
which succeeded to the abolished system of Judaism. The Apostles did not
misunderstand their Master's meaning; but when they speak of his coming,
always refer to the destruction of Jerusalem, and its effects on these two
classes of persons.
In the application of Scriptural language, commonly understood to refer to a
future life and general judgment, to the destruction of Jerusalem, and its
effects as regarded unbelievers and Christians, Mr. Cappe, however, went far
beyond Hammond and Nisbett. Thus, John v. 28, " Marvel not at this; for the
hour is coming in the which all that are in their graves shall hear the
voice of the Son of Man, and shall come forth, they that have done good unto
the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil unto the resurrection
of condemnation," is paraphrased by him, " The time is at no great distance,
when all who are now in their graves, who at present sit in darkness and the
shadow of death, shall hear the voice of the Son of God summoning them to
judgment, and shall come forth out of their present state of darkness
and ignorance, to a new state of mind, to a resurrection which, to those who
have been obedient to the calls of Providence, shall issue in the
preservation of their lives, amidst the calamities which will overwhelm
their country; to those who have refused to hearken to them, shall issue in
their condemnation," Diss. vol. i. p. 325. In John vi. 40, " And this is the
will of Him that sent me, that every one who seeth the Son and believeth on
him may have everlasting life, and I will raise him up at the last day," the
concluding words are rendered, " and that I should exalt him hereafter."
In St. Paul's address to the Thessalonians (1. iv. 13), "I would not have
you be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow
not even as others which have no hope;" those who are asleep are explained
by Mr. Cappe to be those who are not yet awakened to receive Jesus and his
Gospel; and the declaration that "we who are alive and remain unto the
coming of the Lord shall not prevent those who are asleep " is said to mean,
that " we who are already Christians, waiting for His coming, shall not, in
respect of any pleasures or benefits to be derived from His actual presence,
or any personal communication with Him, be beforehand with those who are yet
unawakened, if in the end they be brought to the acknowledgment of the
truth," vol. i. p. 263. There are other points in which Mr. Cappe differed
widely from commentators in general, as in referring the petitions of the
Lord's Prayer and the precepts of the Sermon on the Mount, exclusively to
the Apostles, and considering the Kingdom of Heaven or Kingdom of Christ to
be his dispensation of miraculous powers to his disciples, beginning with
the day of Pentecost and ending with the destruction of Jerusalem. The
repentance which the Baptist preached was, according to Mr. Cappe, only a
change of mind from worldly to spiritual conceptions of the Kingdom of
Heaven. Mr. Cappe, and Mr Wellbeloved after him, rejecting the common
interpretation of the passages supposed to refer to a general resurrection
and day of judgment, believed that the state of reward and punishment began
to each individual at his death —a belief which involves that of an
immaterial principle in man. A hearer of Mr. Wellbeloved could hardly fail
to observe, that he carefully avoided the usual phraseology, and instead of
it employed that of a "future retributory scene."
He regarded the Resurrection not as an example of the future life which
awaits all mankind (in which view the analogy must be acknowledged to be
very imperfect), but as a miracle, confirming the truth of our Saviour's
teaching, which everywhere assumes the doctrine of a future life of
retribution, though it does not teach it in most of the passages which have
been supposed to bear this meaning. His conception of Revelation generally
was, that it did not so much bring new truths to light, as confirm them by
miracles; or, as he sometimes expressed it, " Christianity is a
republication of the law of nature with miraculous sanctions." It is not my
purpose to examine the soundness of these interpretations; but the
circumstance of their being adopted, as I believe they were in all leading
points by Mr. Wellbeloved, is too important to be passed over in his
biography."
Charles Wellbeloved (1769-1858), a dissenting liberal
minister and educator, greatly influenced British Unitarians. Noted for his
wide scholarship and for his well-known defenses of liberal Christianity, he
trained many celebrated Unitarian ministers at Manchester College, York.
Born in London, Charles was the only child of John and
Elizabeth Plaw Wellbeloved. Owing to "domestic unhappiness," he went to live
at age four with his grandfather, Charles Wellbeloved (1713-1782), and never
saw his parents again. He was baptized in the Church of England but was
attracted, along with his grandfather, to Methodism. John Wesley was often a
guest at their house.
Charles was apprenticed to a firm of drapers. He said he learned only there
"how to tie up a parcel." He studied at Homerton Academy under harsh
conditions imposed by his teacher, the Rev. Dr. Benjamin Davies, a strict
Calvinist. The students warmed themselves in their small rooms by burying
their feet in a basket of hay. Wellbeloved's early life and Calvinist
training gave him gloomy views of God and man. Always deeply religious and
sensitive, he never lost a tinge of melancholy.
Liberal-minded fellow students introduced Charles to the writings of Joseph
Priestley and Theophilus Lindsey. In 1787 he went to Hackney Academy in
London, where Priestley and Thomas Belsham were tutors, to train for the
dissenting ministry. Wellbeloved also was influenced by Richard Price, whose
services he attended at Newington Green and Hackney.
Young Wellbeloved took an interest in politics. He spoke firmly against the
many laws restricting dissenters' civil liberties. He wrote to the Morning
Chronicle denouncing the 1791 Birmingham rioters who set fire to Priestley's
home and church. Like many other Unitarians, Wellbeloved supported the
French Revolution for its espousal of liberty. At his invitation Thomas
Paine spoke at Hackney Academy.
In 1792, his studies completed, Wellbeloved accepted a call to serve as
assistant to Newcome Cappe at St. Saviourgate Chapel in York. Upon Cappe's
death in 1800, he became pastor. Wellbeloved served the church as minister
for 66 years, until his death.
In 1793 Wellbeloved married Ann Kinder. When she died in 1832, they had
seven living children. Two sons, John and Robert Scott, studied for the
ministry. In 1819 John, still a student, died of typhus during a trip to
Germany. Robert briefly assisted his father at St. Saviourgate, but was more
successful as a lawyer. Daughter Emma married Sir James Carter, a student at
Manchester College and later Chief Justice of New Brunswick. Daughter Anne
kept house for her father until her death from tuberculosis in 1846.
In need of money to support his family, Wellbeloved early began to
supplement his income by running a school and boarding the students in his
home. In 1803 Manchester Academy, founded in 1786 to train dissenting
ministers, needed a new Principal. Because Wellbeloved would not move to
Manchester, the college moved to York to have him as head. At first he
taught all subjects. He hired additional tutors after a year. He always
worked hard and several times his health broke. In 1840, when age forced him
to retire, the college moved back to Manchester.
Wellbeloved did not allow the school to be called Unitarian because he
wanted students to have an open mind and to discover the truth for
themselves. In 1809 he wrote to George Wood, "I do not and will not teach
Unitarianism or any ism but Christianism. I will endeavour to teach the
students how to study the Scripture—nice if they find Unitarianism
there—well if animism—well if Trinitarianism—well, only let them find
something for themselves."
Under Wellbeloved's Principalship 235 students were educated at the college.
Divinity students numbered 121 and laymen 114. Of the divinity students 30
did not enter the ministry and 5 entered the Anglican priesthood. Among the
lay students were scholars, public servants, notable people in the arts and
businessmen. The majority was Unitarian. Among the distinguished Unitarian
students were James Martineau (later Principal), William Gaskell, Philip
Pearsall Carpenter, John James Tayler (later Principal), Joseph Hunter,
Joseph Hutton, William Raynor Wood, Daniel Jones, William Turner, Jr., James
Yates, Robert Wallace (later Principal), Mark Philips (prominent Member of
Parliament), and Edward Worthington.
Wellbeloved was fluent in French and Italian. His printed sermons were
footnoted with Greek, Latin, and Hebrew references, and he read Arabic,
Syriac, Chaldee, and German. In 1814 he began a translation of the Old
Testament from original sources, intended for family worship and including
copious scholarly and homiletic notes. The translation occupied much of his
spare time the rest of his life. He completed the Pentateuch in 1825 and
Psalms in 1838, but never finished the project. In 1801 he published
Devotional Exercises for young people. He edited theological and
metaphysical sections of the Annual Review, 1802-07, published by Longman &
Rees.
An antiquarian and archaeologist, Wellbeloved wrote Eburacum; or, York under
the Romans, 1842. He formed the Antiquarian Society, helped organize the
Yorkshire Philosophical Society, served as Curator of Antiquities at the
York Museum, and wrote a history of St. Mary's Abbey, a Benedictine
monastery. In 1827 he undertook to save the Roman wall around the city of
York and raised money for its restoration.
Many of Wellbeloved's contributions to his city went beyond scholarship and
education for ministry. The York Lunatic Asylum was inhumanely and poorly
managed until Wellbeloved became the chairman of the committee of governors,
1831-50. Taking an active role in the administration and replacing severity
with kindness, he won the inmates' trust. He assisted at the Wilberforce
School for the Blind. He was a founder of the York Mechanics Institute,
whose purpose was to provide education for ordinary people. The Institute
had a library and reading room and sponsored public lectures on science,
history and literature. Wellbeloved himself gave many evening lectures. He
served as director of the York Dispensary, the Savings Bank, the School of
Design, and the Art Gallery. After the famous York Minster burned in 1829,
Wellbeloved successfully campaigned and raised money for its restoration to
its original condition. The Archbishop of York wrote to thank him for his
diligence. Wellbeloved's student William Gaskell later commented, "There is
scarcely an institution designed for [the benefit of the citizens of York]
with which he was not in some way connected, or which he did not help to
originate."
Prominent Anglican churchmen attacked Unitarians. In 1799 Wellbeloved
refuted Bishop Samuel Horsley's charge that Unitarians were atheists. He
wrote, "We acknowledge one God, who in Scripture is called the God and
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Maker of all worlds, and the Governor
and Judge of all men. We consider Jesus as his prophet, commissioned to
teach mankind."
In 1823 Wellbeloved defended Captain Thomas Thrush, a Unitarian naval
officer who, after his conversion, publicized pacifist principles. The
strategy of his opponent, Archdeacon Francis Wrangham, was to attack and
destroy his adversaries' reputations. Wellbeloved made no counterattack on
Wrangham, but answered the charges reasonably with learning and modesty. It
was generally agreed that Wellbeloved had the better of the dispute. He
wrote to Wrangham, "If, in vindicating the doctrines you have so bitterly
opposed, and the characters you have so wrongly aspersed, there has been any
thing in my manner needlessly harsh and offensive; if I have been betrayed
into any thing unbecoming a scholar and a Christian, here avow my sincere
regret, and tender a willing apology. And if I have, in any instance,
misapprehended your words, and attributed to them a meaning which they will
not bear, or which you did not design them to express; or if I have fallen
into errors of any other kind, I require only to be convinced, in order
publicly to acknowledge and correct them."
The public sided entirely with Wellbeloved. The Rev. Sydney Smith, a
well-known Anglican vicar, remarked that if he had a cause to gain, he would
fee Wellbeloved to plead for him and double-fee Wrangham to plead against
him.
Lady Sarah Hewley, a 17th century Presbyterian dissenter and a builder of
St. Saviourgate Chapel, had set up a trust in support of the non-conforming
ministry, from which both Wellbeloved and Manchester College benefited. More
orthodox dissenters of the 19th century initiated and won a suit against the
Unitarian trustees of the funds in series of trials, 1833-39. The court
interrogated Wellbeloved concerning his beliefs. In his testimony he called
himself a Protestant Dissenter of Presbyterian polity, rather than a
Unitarian. He offered only this statement of belief: "Whatever is taught in
Christ's Holy Gospel, concerning the existence, perfections, and government
of God, the person and the office of Christ, the terms of pardon and
acceptance with God, the duties of life, and a future state of righteous
retribution, the defendant gratefully and cordially receives and professes
as divine truth."
The Chancellor, Lord Eldon, ruled against the Unitarians (and Wellbeloved),
declaring Unitarianism "wicked and blasphemous," a criminal offense under
the common law, and Unitarians not entitled to any protection or benefit of
the law. Unitarians would have lost every trust, deed, and chapel they owned
had not Parliament in 1844 granted them protection under the Dissenters'
Chapels Bill.
Charles Wellbeloved was excessively modest. Several times when banquets were
given to honor him, he became too sick to attend. Never recognized by the
British Unitarian association, or even by the college until in 1998 a room
was named for him, he greatly influenced Unitarians. Without his labors
Manchester College, now a part of Oxford University, almost certainly would
not have survived. The standards of scholarship, religious service and piety
Wellbeloved established have informed the history of the College.
A collection of Wellbeloved's books, articles, pamphlets, and manuscripts
are at Harris Manchester College, Oxford. Out of modesty he destroyed all
his sermon manuscripts, an accumulation spanning seven decades. We know of
them only because reporters took down his words and printed them in
magazines and newspapers. Among his printed sermons are The Principles of
Roman Catholics and Unitarians Contrasted (1800); The Religious and Moral
Improvement of Mankind (1815); A Sermon . . . in Aid of a Subscription for
the Erection of a Unitarian Chapel in Calcutta (1825); and "The Mystery of
Godliness," in the Christian Reformer (1826). His controversy with Wrangham
was published as Three Letters (1823) and Three Additional Letters (1824).
He also wrote Memoir of T. Thrush (1845).
There are two biographies: A Biographical Memoir of the Late Rev. Charles
Wellbeloved, by his son-in-law John Kenrick (1860), and A Fine Victorian
Gentleman, The Life and Times of Charles Wellbeloved, by Frank Schulman
(1999). An account of his Principalship is in V. D. Davis, A History of
Manchester College (1932) and in David L. Wykes, "Dissenting Academy or
Unitarian Seminary? Manchester College at York (1803-1840)," Transactions of
the Unitarian Historical Society (1988). An account of the conflict over the
Lady Hewley Trust is in Frank Schulman, Blasphemous and Wicked, The
Unitarian Struggle for Equality 1813-1844 (1997). There are numerous
references to Wellbeloved in Truth, Liberty, Religion, ed. Barbara Smith
(1986). The picture of Charles Wellbeloved is a detail from an oil painting
by James Lonsdale. The original hangs in the Senior Common Room at Harris
Manchester College, Oxford. A duplicate of the painting is at the York
Museum. It is the only likeness ever made of him.
What do YOU think ?
Send an email with your comments to
todd @ preteristarchive.com
Be sure to include the article name.
They will be posted shortly
upon receipt
|