|
STUDY ARCHIVE

Main Page














EARLY CHURCH
Ambrose
Ambrose, Pseudo
Andreas
Arethas
Aphrahat
Athanasius
Augustine
Barnabus
BarSerapion
Baruch, Pseudo
Bede
Chrysostom
Chrysostom, Pseudo
Clement, Alexandria
Clement, Rome
Clement, Pseudo
Cyprian
Ephraem
Epiphanes
Eusebius
Gregory
Hegesippus
Hippolytus
Ignatius
Irenaeus
Isidore
James
Jerome
King Jesus
Apostle John
Lactantius
Luke
Mark
Justin Martyr
Mathetes
Matthew
Melito
Oecumenius
Origen
Apostle Paul
Apostle Peter
Maurus Rabanus
Remigius
"Solomon"
Severus
St.
Symeon
Tertullian
Theophylact
Victorinus

HISTORICAL PRETERISM
(Minor Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation
in Past)
Joseph Addison
Oswald T. Allis Thomas Aquinas
Karl Auberlen
Augustine
Albert Barnes
Karl Barth
G.K. Beale Beasley-Murray
John Bengel
Wilhelm Bousset
John A. Broadus
David Brown
"Haddington Brown"
F.F. Bruce
Augustin Calmut
John Calvin
B.H. Carroll
Johannes Cocceius
Vern Crisler
Thomas Dekker
Wilhelm De Wette
Philip Doddridge
Isaak Dorner
Dutch Annotators
Alfred Edersheim
Jonathan Edwards
E.B.
Elliott
Heinrich Ewald Patrick Fairbairn
Js. Farquharson
A.R. Fausset
Robert Fleming
Hermann Gebhardt
Geneva Bible
Charles Homer Giblin
John Gill
William Gilpin
W.B. Godbey
Ezra Gould
Steve Gregg
Hank Hanegraaff
Hengstenberg Matthew Henry
G.A. Henty
George Holford
Johann von Hug
William Hurte
J, F, and Brown
B.W. Johnson
John Jortin
Benjamin Keach
K.F. Keil
Henry Kett
Richard Knatchbull Johann Lange
Cornelius Lapide
Nathaniel Lardner
Jean Le Clerc
Peter Leithart
Jack P. Lewis
Abiel Livermore
John Locke
Martin Luther
James MacDonald
James MacKnight
Dave MacPherson
Keith Mathison
Philip Mauro
Thomas Manton
Heinrich Meyer
J.D. Michaelis
Johann Neander
Sir Isaac Newton
Thomas Newton
Stafford North
Dr. John Owen
Blaise Pascal
William W. Patton
Arthur Pink
Thomas Pyle
Maurus Rabanus
St. Remigius
Anne Rice
Kim Riddlebarger
J.C. Robertson
Edward Robinson
Andrew Sandlin
Johann Schabalie
Philip Schaff
Thomas Scott
C.J. Seraiah
Daniel Smith
Dr. John
Smith
C.H. Spurgeon Rudolph E. Stier
A.H. Strong St. Symeon
Theophylact
Friedrich Tholuck
George Townsend
James Ussher
Wm. Warburton
Benjamin Warfield
Noah Webster
John Wesley
B.F. Westcott William Whiston
Herman Witsius
N.T. Wright
John Wycliffe
Richard Wynne
C.F.J. Zullig

MODERN PRETERISTS
(Major Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation
in Past)
Firmin Abauzit
Jay Adams
Luis Alcazar
Greg Bahnsen
Beausobre, L'Enfant
Jacques Bousset
John L. Bray
David Brewster
Dr. John Brown
Thomas Brown
Newcombe Cappe
David Chilton
Adam Clarke
Henry Cowles
Ephraim Currier
R.W. Dale
Gary DeMar
P.S. Desprez
Johann Eichhorn
Heneage Elsley
F.W. Farrar
Samuel Frost
Kenneth Gentry
Hugo Grotius
Francis X. Gumerlock
Henry Hammond
Hampden-Cook
Friedrich Hartwig
Adolph Hausrath
Thomas
Hayne
J.G. Herder
Timothy Kenrick
J. Marcellus Kik
Samuel Lee
Peter Leithart
John Lightfoot
Benjamin Marshall
F.D. Maurice
Marion Morris
Ovid Need, Jr
Wm. Newcombe
N.A. Nisbett
Gary North
Randall Otto
Zachary Pearce
Andrew Perriman
Beilby Porteus
Ernst Renan
Gregory Sharpe
Fr. Spadafora
R.C. Sproul
Moses Stuart
Milton S. Terry
Herbert
Thorndike
C. Vanderwaal
Foy Wallace
Israel P.
Warren Chas Wellbeloved
J.J. Wetstein
Richard Weymouth
Daniel Whitby
George Wilkins
E.P. Woodward

FUTURISTS
(Virtually No Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 & Revelation in 1st
C. - Types Only ; Also Included are "Higher Critics" Not Associated With Any
Particular Eschatology)
Henry Alford
G.C. Berkower
Alan Patrick Boyd
John Bradford
Wm.
Burkitt
George Caird
Conybeare/ Howson
John Crossan
John N. Darby
C.H. Dodd E.B. Elliott
G.S.
Faber
Jerry Falwell
Charles G. Finney
J.P. Green Sr.
Murray Harris
Thomas Ice
Benjamin Jowett John N.D. Kelly
Hal Lindsey
John MacArthur
William Miller
Robert Mounce Eduard Reuss
J.A.T. Robinson
George Rosenmuller
D.S. Russell
George Sandison
C.I. Scofield
Dr. John Smith
Norman Snaith
"Televangelists" Thomas Torrance
Jack/Rex VanImpe
John Walvoord
Quakers :
George Fox |
Margaret Fell (Fox) |
Isaac Penington
PRETERIST UNIVERSALISM |
PRETERIST-IDEALISM
|
|

Sir David Brewster
(1781 – 1868)
Scottish scientist, inventor and writer.
The Institute of France elected Brewster a
corresponding member. The Royal Academies of Russia, Prussia, Sweden,
and Denmark each conferred on him the highest distinctions accorded a
foreigner. |
 |
"The prophecy in the
29th, 30th, and 31st verses, which contain the greatest difficulty, appears
to me to have been fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem. "
In the midst of all the varied study it is pleasant to
see how David could turn his whole attention to answering, to the best of
his ability, "without assistance," as he himself says, a question put by Mr.
Veitch :--
"Edinburgh, October 16, 1801.
"Dear Sir, -- I received yours, and
shall endeavour, as far as I am able, to explain the passage of Matthew
which you have mentioned. It has long been a dispute among divines
whether or not all prophecies have double senses, that is, refer to two
events at the same time, and a great many learned men have defended each
side of the question. Now, if we believe in the double senses of
prophecy, it is easy to explain the whole 24th chapter of Matthew, by saying
that it refers, in the first part, to the destruction of Jerusalem, and in
the last, to the end of the world ; but still a difficulty occurs in the
34th verse, where it is said that this generation shall not pass away till
all these things be fulfilled. I do not agree, however, with
those who believe in the double sense of prophecy, as it is contrary to that
simplicity which ought to be expected in the sacred writings, and would
therefore explain the chapter in a different manner, as referring wholly to
the destruction of Jerusalem. In the 3rd verse, the coming of
Christ and the end of the world (or rather, the end of the age,
as it is in the original), signifies nothing more than than period when the
Jewish Polity and State should be completely overturned, and the Christian
dispensation become more firmly established, by the destruction of its
enemies, and by the interposition of Christ in the overthrow of Jerusalem.
The prophecy in the 29th, 30th, and
31st verses, which contain the greatest difficulty, appears to me to have
been fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem. Christ might with sufficient
propriety be said to come in the clouds of heaven, in power and glory, when
at that time the most wonderful appearances in the heavens took place that
were ever seen. The stars may with propriety be said to fall from heaven,
when lightnings and great globes of fire destroyed the workmen appointed by
the Emperor Julian to rebuild Jerusalem; and, if I am not mistaken, the sun
and moon were actually darkened at the overthrow of that city. All the
tribes of the earth might be said to mourn when so many thousands of Jews
were slain in such a cruel manner, and when they heard of the dreadful
barbarities which were committed upon them by the Romans. And the elect
might properly be said to be gathered together from all quarters of the
heavens, when the Christian religion, as it then actually did, extended
itself rapidly over most countries of the known world, and brought the glad
tidings of salvation to men of every description, nation, and language. This
is the only consistent explanation of the passage which I can give without
any assistance.—I am, yours sincerely, "
Frequently, in the earliest morning, when the writing and
the microscope, and the Bible-reading were over, have I been awakened to
listen in awe to the sounds of prayer and weeping below.
A year or two later the following touching incident and conversation took
place. Mrs. Macpherson writes:— "
It was in March 1856 that I had a long talk with dear Papa upon the
suffering of Christ, from which we passed on to speaking of the gratitude
due to God. He said he never could feel that there was any such strong
ground for a claim of gratitude as people spoke of, since he felt that he
had received no more good than was absolutely necessary to enable him to do
the work that God required of him. Then we spoke of the possibility of
feeling any love towards God, and agreed that such a sentiment of love as is
possible between man and man, was impossible between man and God. ' How can
we love Him,' he said, ' One whom we have not seen ? We admire Him in His
works, and trust from the wisdom seen in these that He is wise in all His
dealings,—but how can we LOVE Him ?'" After this conversation, his
daughter-in-law being herself led to understand how alone the love of the
unseen Christ can be shed abroad in the heart by the working of the Holy
Spirit, felt that she must confess this change in her views and feelings. "
He listened most attentively, and when I had finished, took me in his arms,
kissed me, and said in such a child-like manner,' Go now, then, and pray
that I may know it too.'" (316,317)
WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID
James Hogg
"He has indeed some minor specialities
about him. For example, he holds that soda water is wholesomer drink than
bottled beer, objects to a body's putting a nipper of spirits in their tea,
and maintains that you ought to shave every morning, and wash your feet
every night, - but who would wish to be severe on the eccentricities of
genius?"
Cozy Baker
Reflective symmetry has been observed since ancient
times. Legend claims that early Egyptians would place two or three slabs of
highly polished limestone together at different angles and watch with
fascination as mandalas were formed by human dancers. It was not until
centuries later, however, that this optical phenomenon was encased in one
small tube and given a name. The kaleidoscope was invented in 1816 by Sir
David Brewster. He was a man with as many facets as his invention. Whether
delving into scientific research, religion, philosophy, education, optics,
photography, writing, inventions, or life on other planets, Sir David
pursued each endeavor with incredible energy.
David Brewster was born in Jedburgh, an obscure country
town in the midst of the Scottish lowlands, on December 11, 1781. He was
recognized as a child prodigy, and constructed a telescope when only ten
years old. This would prove indicative of the chief bent of Brewster's work
and genius. Nature endowed him with some of its choice gifts: dose
observation, unceasing inquiry, and a scientific proclivity. Far before his
peers, he absorbed all that was available in elementary Scottish education.
Because he evidenced an exceptional aptitude for learning, his family
decided that he should study for the ministry of the Church of Scotland.
Thus, at the tender age of 12, he was consigned to the University of
Edinburgh, where he continued his intellectual achievements. He was greatly
admired at the university for his unusual academic ability, and was
generously welcomed into the intimate fellowship of the distinguished
professors of philosophy and mathematics. The zenith of his formal education
was reached at age 19 when he was awarded an honorary master of arts degree.
This carried with it a license to preach the gospel as a minister of the
Scottish Established Church. Of Brewster's brief pulpit episode, James Hogg,
a colleague, wrote in a letter to publisher James Fraser: " . . . he was
licensed, but the first day he mounted the pulpit was the last, for he had
then, if he has not still, a nervous something about him that made him
swither when he heard his own voice and saw a congregation eyeing him; so he
stacked his discourse, and vowed never to try that job again. It was a pity
for Kirk, (the National Church of Scotland) ... but it was a good day for
Science ... for if the doctor had gotten a manse, he might most likely have
taken to his toddy like other folk."
This was in the year 1801, and Brewster immediately turned his great talents
to two of his life-long interests, the study of optics and the development
of scientific instruments. For twelve years he conducted a series of
experiments that were revealed to the public in A Treatise Upon New
Philosophical Instruments, published in 1813.
Brewster's treatise did not represent his only
accomplishments during this period. In 1807, at the age of 26, the
University of Aberdeen awarded him a Doctor of Letters degree, the highest
literary distinction of that era and a truly unique achievement for one of
his age. But this was not all-in 1808, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal
Society of Edinburgh, and the same year became editor of the Edinburgh
Encyclopedia, a position he distinguished with excellence for more than
20 years.
In 1810, Brewster married Juliet McPherson. Their marriage, which produced
four sons and one daughter, was apparently a happy one, lasting forty years
until Juliet's death. It was not until a few months before Brewster's
seventy-fifth birthday that he married his second wife, Jane Purnell. As
well as being a devoted companion, she presented him with a daughter who
became the bright light of his golden years. Very little else is recorded
about Brewster's family life. It might be noted, however, that Sir D.B., as
he was called by his friends, paid little attention, if any, to genealogy,
except for the suggestion that one of his ancestors, William Elder Brewster,
led the noble band of English dissenters to America on the Mayflower in
1610. Shortly after Brewster's death, his daughter, Mrs. Margaret M. Gordon,
published a biography entitled The Home Life Of Sir David Brewster.
The word "home" was loosely interpreted, and throughout 500 pages Mrs.
Gordon cites Brewster's many activities, including the publication of over
2,000 scientific papers. Surprisingly candid in some of her observations,
she did not conceal the fact that her distinguished father could be
"irritable, impatient, litigious, and verbally aggressive," hastening to
explain on the other hand that "he was a man with a strong personality,
strong constitution and possessed a great personal charm when he chose to
exercise it."
It was in 1811, while writing an article on "Burning
Instruments," Brewster investigated Buffon's Needle theory (considered to be
the first problem in geometric probability). Brewster did not consider
Buffon's proposal practical. However, it sparked an idea that produced
awesome scientific results. In the course of his investigation he
constructed a lens of great diameter out of one piece of glass by cutting
out the central parts in successive ridges like stair steps. Thus was born
an apparatus of then-unequaled power-the polyzonal lens-a lens constructed
by building it on several circular segments. This useful discovery, which
created light-stabs of brilliance that could pierce far into the night, was
later perfected and named after French physicist A. Fresnel, and resulted in
the lighthouse as we know it today.
This breakthrough was followed by yet other honors. Brewster was admitted to
the Royal Society of London, and was later awarded the Rumford gold and
silver medal for his theory on the polarization of light. Ambient light,
which comprises most of the light we encounter every day, is a collection of
light waves vibrating in all directions. When light is reflected or it
passes through certain materials, the waves tend to vibrate in a single
direction. Light that vibrates in this more orderly fashion is polarized.
Brewster discovered a simple way to calculate the angle at which light must
strike a substance for maximum polarization. Brewster's Angle is useful in
all kinds of practical applications, from adjusting radio signals to
building microscopes capable of examining objects on a molecular scale. It
is central to the development of fiber optics, lasers, and to the study of
meteorology, cosmology, and material in 1816, the Institute of France
science. Success followed success, and in 1816, the Institute of France
adjudged him 3,000 francs - half the prizes given that year for the two
important scientific discoveries madce in the two previous years.
Then, as an added jewel to his already glittering optics crown, Brewster
invented the kaleidoscope! It was 1816, and Brewster, at 35, was already an
established philosopher, writer, scientist, and inventor. His kaleidoscope
created unprecedented clamor. Dr. Peter M. Roget (whose illustrious
Thesaurus, established in 1834, continues to be the most valued writer's
tool next to the dictionary) paid tribute to his friend Sir David's
invention in Blackwood's Magazine in 1818: "In the memory of man, no
invention, and no work, whether addressed to the imagination or to the
understanding, ever produced such an effect."
A universal mania for the instrument seized all classes,
from the lowest to the highest, from the most ignorant to the most learned,
and every person not only felt, but expressed the feeling that a new
pleasure had been added to their existence.
While Brewster was granted a patent for his kaleidoscope,
as well as acknowledgment and acclaim for his invention, he did not realize
any remuneration. Others did, however. There was some fault with the patent
registration, and before Brewster could claim any financial rewards,
kaleldoscopes were quickly manufactured by aggressive entrepreneurs who sold
hundreds of thousands with great financial success for themselves. As was
the case for so many other great men, this was to be the pattern of
Brewster's life: great intellectual achievement without worldly
compensation.
In 1823, the Institute of France elected Brewster a
corresponding member. The Royal Academies of Russia, Prussia, Sweden, and
Denmark each conferred on him the highest distinctions accorded a foreigner.
These high honors opened lines of communication for him with the great minds
of Europe.
In midlife, in 1832, he was knighted by William IV,
instantaneously acquiring a social status known only by those few touched by
the king. However, Brewster simply continued to pursue his investigations
and experiments. In short, he remained the poorly paid teacher whom James
Hogg described in this manner: "He has indeed some minor specialities about
him. For example, he holds that soda water is wholesomer drink than bottled
beer, objects to a body's putting a nipper of spirits in their tea, and
maintains that you ought to shave every morning, and wash your feet every
night, - but who would wish to be severe on the eccentricities of genius?"
One of Brewster's most illustrious moments came in 1849. He was nominated as
one of a panel of eight foreign associates to the National Institute of
France. So great were Brewster's achievements in comparison to all others
that, after examination, the institute struck the names of all other
candidates and Sir David Brewster stood in splendid isolation as the sole
remaining candidate. His discoveries of the physical laws of metallic
reflection and light absorption, the optical properties of crystals, and the
law of the angle of polarization, along with his improvement of the
stereoscope and lighthouse apparatus, surpassed most scientific achievements
of that era.
Brewster's contributions to philosophy and science earned
him honors and accolades from his peers, but it was by his pen that he
earned his living. Among his most noteworthy books are two major treatises
on the kaleidoscope (one written in 1816, and a revised edition in 1858);
two separate biographies on the life of Sir Isaac Newton; A Treatise on
New Philosophical Instruments; Martyrs Of Science: or the Laws of Galieo,
Tycho Brahe, and Kepler; Letters on Natural Magic Addressed to Sir Walter
Scott; A Treatise on Optics; and More Worlds Than One.
The bicentenary of Brewster's birth provided a suitable
occasion to re-examine the history of this great man. A symposium was held
at the Royal Scottish Museum in Edinburgh on November 21, 1981. Each segment
of his diverse career was covered by an expert authority, and it was the
general consensus that in a time and place renowned for artistic,
intellectual, scientific, and technical vitality, Brewster's accomplishments
were unsurpassed. Quoting from writer and Brewster colleague R. S. Westfall,
"He deserves to be remembered as one of humanity's prouder exhibits. What an
inexhaustible reservoir of vitality."
There is no doubt that Brewster would be surprised and
perhaps disillusioned to find that his most enduring legacy is the
kaleidoscope. His achievements and contributions to the world of science,
and to the social and cultural history of the era, actually covered a much
broader spectrum, as did his numerous inventions, including the lenticular
stereoscope, binocular camera, polyzonal lens, polarimeter, and lighthouse
illuminator.
Wikipedia
Sir David Brewster (11 December 1781 – 10 February
1868) was a Scottish scientist, inventor and writer.
He was born at Jedburgh, where his father, a teacher of high
reputation, was rector of the grammar school. At the age of
twelve, he was sent to the University of Edinburgh, being
intended for the clergy. However, he had already shown a
strong inclination for natural science, and this had been
fostered by his intimacy with a "self-taught philosopher,
astronomer and mathematician," as Sir Walter Scott called
him, of great local fame—James Veitch of Inchbonny, who was
particularly skilful in making telescopes.
Though he duly finished his theological
studies and was licensed to preach, Brewster's other
interests distracted him from the duties of his profession.
In 1799 fellow-student, Henry Brougham, persuaded him to
study the diffraction of light. The results of his
investigations were communicated from time to time in papers
to the Philosophical Transactions of London and other
scientific journals. The fact that other philosophers,
notably Etienne Louis Malus and Augustin Fresnel, were
pursuing the same investigations contemporaneously in France
does not invalidate Brewster's claim to independent
discovery, even though in one or two cases the priority must
be assigned to others. A lesser-known classmate of his,
Thomas Dick, also went on to become a popular astronomical
writer.
The most important subjects of his
inquiries can be enumerated under the following five
headings:
-
The laws of
polarization by
reflection and
refraction, and other quantitative laws of phenomena
-
The discovery of the polarizing
structure induced by
heat and
pressure
-
The discovery of crystals with two
axes of double refraction, and many of the laws of their
phenomena, including the connection between optical
structure and crystalline forms
-
The laws of
metallic reflection
-
Experiments on the absorption of
light.
In this line of investigation, the prime
importance belongs to the discovery
-
of the connection between the
refractive index and the polarizing angle
-
of biaxial crystals, and
-
of the production of double
refraction by irregular heating.
These discoveries were promptly
recognized. As early as 1807 the degree of LL.D. was
conferred upon Brewster by Marischal College, Aberdeen; in
1815 he was made a member of the Royal Society of London,
and received the Copley medal; in 1818 he received the
Rumford Medal of the society; and in 1816 the French
Institute awarded him one-half of the prize of three
thousand francs for the two most important discoveries in
physical science made in Europe during the two preceding
years.
Among the non-scientific public his fame spread more
effectually by his rediscovery in about 1815 of the
kaleidoscope, for which there was a great demand in both the
United Kingdom and the United States. An instrument of
greater interest, the stereoscope, which, though of much
later date (1849–1850), and along with the kaleidoscope did
more than anything else to popularize his name, was not, as
has often been asserted, the invention of Brewster. Sir
Charles Wheatstone discovered its principle and applied it
as early as 1838 to the construction of a cumbersome but
effective instrument, in which the binocular pictures were
made to combine by means of mirrors. Brewster's contribution
was the suggestion to use lenses for uniting the dissimilar
pictures; and accordingly the lenticular stereoscope may
fairly be said to be his invention.
A much more valuable and practical result of Brewster's
optical researches was the improvement of the British
lighthouse system. Although Fresnel, who had also the
satisfaction of being the first to put it into operation,
perfected the dioptric apparatus independently, Brewster was
active earlier in the field than Fresnel, describing the
dioptric apparatus in 1812. He pressed its adoption on those
in authority at least as early as 1820, two years before
Fresnel suggested it and it was finally introduced into
lighthouses mainly through his persistent efforts.
Although Brewster's own discoveries were important, they
were not his only service to science. He began writing in
1799 as a regular contributor to the Edinburgh Magazine, of
which he acted as editor at the age of twenty. In 1807, he
undertook the editorship of the newly projected Edinburgh
Encyclopaedia, of which the first part appeared in 1808, and
the last not until 1830. The work was strongest in the
scientific department, and many of its most valuable
articles were from the pen of the editor. At a later period
he was one of the leading contributors to the Encyclopædia
Britannica (seventh and eighth editions) writing, among
others, the articles on electricity, hydrodynamics,
magnetism, microscope, optics, stereoscope, and voltaic
electricity.
In 1819 Brewster undertook further editorial work by
establishing, in conjunction with Robert Jameson
(1774–1854), the Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, which took
the place of the Edinburgh magazine. The first ten volumes
(1819–1824) were published under the joint editorship of
Brewster and Jameson, the remaining four volumes (1825–1826)
being edited by Jameson alone. After parting company with
Jameson, Brewster started the Edinburgh Journal of Science
in 1824, sixteen volumes of which appeared under his
editorship during the years 1824–1832, with very many
articles from his own pen.
He contributed between three and four hundred papers to the
transactions of various learned societies, and few of his
contemporaries wrote as much for the various reviews. In the
North British Review alone seventy-five articles of his
appeared. A list of his larger separate works will be found
below. Special mention, however, must be made of the most
important of them all–his biography of Sir Isaac Newton. In
1831 he published a short popular account of the
philosopher's life in Murray's Family Library; but it was
not until 1855 that he was able to issue the much fuller
Memoirs of the Life, Writings and Discoveries of Sir Isaac
Newton, a work which embodied the results of more than
twenty years' investigation of original manuscripts and
other available sources.
Brewster's position as editor brought him into frequent
contact with the most eminent scientific men, and he was
naturally among the first to recognize the benefit that
would accrue from regular communication among those in the
field of science. In an article in the Quarterly Review, he
made a suggestion for "an association of our nobility,
clergy, gentry and philosophers," which was taken up by
others and found speedy realization in the British
Association for the Advancement of Science. Its first
meeting was held at York in 1831; and Brewster, along with
Charles Babbage and Sir John F. W. Herschel, had the chief
part in shaping its constitution.
In the same year in which the British
Association held its first meeting, Brewster received the
honour of knighthood and the decoration of the Guelphic
order of Hanover. In 1838, he was appointed principal of the
united colleges of St Salvator and St Leonard, University of
St Andrews. In 1849, he acted as president of the British
Association and was elected one of the eight foreign
associates of the Institute of France in succession to J. J.
Berzelius; and ten years later, he accepted the office of
principal of the University of Edinburgh, the duties of
which he discharged until within a few months of his death.
Of a high-strung and nervous temperament, Brewster was
somewhat irritable in matters of controversy; but he was
repeatedly subjected to serious provocation. He was a man of
highly honourable and fervently religious character. In
estimating his place among scientific discoverers, the chief
thing to be borne in mind is that his genius was not
characteristically mathematical. His method was empirical,
and the laws that he established were generally the result
of repeated experiment. To the ultimate explanation of the
phenomena with which he dealt he contributed nothing, and it
is noteworthy although he did not maintain to the end of his
life the corpuscular theory he never explicitly adopted the
wave theory of light. Few would dispute the verdict of James
D. Forbes, an editor of the eighth edition of the
Encyclopædia Britannica: "His scientific glory is different
in kind from that of Young and Fresnel; but the discoverer
of the law of polarization of biaxial crystals, of optical
mineralogy, and of double refraction by compression, will
always occupy a foremost rank in the intellectual history of
the age." In addition to the various works of Brewster
already mentioned, the following may be added: Notes and
Introduction to Carlyle's translation of Legendre's Elements
of Geometry (1824); Treatise on Optics (1831); Letters on
Natural Magic, addressed to Sir Walter Scott (1832); The
Martyrs of Science, or the Lives of Galileo, Tycho Brahe,
and Kepler (1841); More Worlds than One (1854).
See also
Brewster's angle.
The University of Sydney
"Wheatstone’s reflecting stereoscope being large and
cumbersome, Sir David Brewster (1781-1868) devised a
smaller, more portable instrument using lenses – referred to
as a lenticular stereoscope. Brewster was a scientific
editor and writer who was also a leading experimental
researcher, especially in optics. He invented an optical
toy, the kaleidoscope, which was phenomenally popular in the
late 1810s and has continued to be produced. He was also
very prone to getting into very public disputes.
Brewster was among those who saw Wheatstone’s demonstration
of the stereoscope at the annual meeting of the British
Association for the Advancement of Science held in
Newcastle-on-Tyne in 1838. He was intrigued by the
phenomenon of stereoscopy and soon obtained a reflecting
stereoscope. In 1849 he proposed his own design of
stereoscope consisting of a box with a pair of half lenses
and an opening to insert a ‘slide’ – the pair of images
mounted side by side.
Brewster was unable to find any prominent scientific
instrument maker in Britain to manufacture his design and in
1850 took a prototype on a visit to Paris where he showed it
to the optical instrument maker Jules Duboscq. Duboscq began
manufacturing lenticular stereoscopes and also taking stereo
daguerreotypes. During the Great Exhibition, Duboscq
exhibited the new stereoscopes. This was the beginning of
the popularity of the stereoscope in the form devised by
Brewster. With improvements in photography, especially the
introduction of the wet-plate process, stereo photography
(and photography generally) became increasingly popular as
the 1850s wore on. Over the following decades, numerous
variants of the lenticular stereoscope were devised,
stereoscopic cameras were invented, and stereoscopic
photographs were produced by the million.

This hand-coloured card-mounted stereo photograph,
showing Sir David Brewster and a Brewster stereo viewer,
was published by the London Stereoscopic Company and
retailed from their New York shop about 1860.
What do YOU think ?
Submit Your Comments For Posting Here
..Will Be Spam
Filtered and Posted Shortly..
|