PRET ARCHIVE WWW

Crosswalk Bible Study Tools

Words/Verses:
Located Where:
 Which Version:  
  Tools!         HELP / OT Tools |NT Tools

Tools: WWSB | Google Books | TexCrit | Vine's | Gk-Lex-Alts-Vars | Aramaic-Lex-Lex2 | Gk/Hb Font | X-late | HYPERpreteristarchive.com


Website Color Key


Preterist Charts


David S. Clark - The Message From Patmos:
A Postmillennial Commentary on the Book of Revelation
(1921 PDF)

"This early twentieth-century Postmillennial commentary on the Book of Revelation, written by the father of theologian Gordon Clark, offers an easy-to-read alternative to the popular Pre-millennial/Dispensational views of the best-selling Scofield Reference Bible and a multitude of other dissertations on end-time prophecy that litter the shelves of the average Christian bookstores. "



Historical Preterism
Historical Preterism Main
Study Archive

Click for PreteristArchive.com Home

Instaverse Bible Verse and Commentary Lookup

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

EARLY CHURCH

Andreas
Arethas Caesarea
Aphrahat
St. Athanasius
Augustine
Barnabus
Pseudo-Baruch
Venerable Bede
Chrysostom
Pseudo-Chrysostom
Clement Alexandria
Clement of Rome
Pseudo-Clementines
Cyprian
Ephraem
Epiphanes
Eusebius
Gregory
Hegesippus
Hippolytus
Ignatius
Irenaeus
James
Jerome
King Jesus
Apostle John
Lactantius
Luke
Mark
Justin Martyr
Mathetes
Matthew
Melito of Sardis
Oecumenius
Origen
Apostle Paul
Apostle Peter
"Solomon"
Sulpicius Severus
Tertullian
Victorinus

HISTORICAL PRETERISM
(Minor Fulfillment of Matt. 24/25 or Revelation in Past)

Joseph Addison
Oswald T. Allis
Karl Auberlen
Thomas Aquinas
Augustine
Albert Barnes
Karl Barth
G.K. Beale
Beasley-Murray
John Bengel
John A. Broadus

David Brown
"Haddington Brown"
F.F. Bruce

John Calvin
B.H. Carroll
Vern Crisler
Philip Doddridge
Isaak Dorner
Dutch Annotators
Alfred Edersheim
Jonathan Edwards

Patrick Fairbairn
James Farquharson
A.R. Fausset
Robert Fleming
Geneva Bible
John Gill
W.B. Godbey
Ezra Gould
Steve Gregg
Hank Hanegraaff
Hengstenberg
Matthew Henry
G.A. Henty
George Holford
William Hurte
J, F, and Brown
B.W. Johnson
Dr. Jortin
Benjamin Keach
K.F. Keil
Henry Kett
Johann Lange

Nathaniel Lardner
Jean Le Clerc
Peter Leithart
Jack P. Lewis
Abiel Livermore
John Locke
Martin Luther

Dave MacPherson
James MacDonald
James MacKnight
Philip Mauro
Thomas Manton
Heinrich Meyer
J.D. Michaelis
Johann Neander
Sir Isaac Newton
Thomas Newton
Stafford North
Dr. John Owen
 Blaise Pascal
William W. Patton
Arthur Pink

Maurus Rabanus
St. Remigius

Anne Rice
J.C. Robertson
Edward Robinson
Andrew Sandlin
Johann Schabalie
Philip Schaff
Thomas Scott
C.J. Seraiah
Daniel Smith
C.H. Spurgeon

Rudolph E. Stier
A.H. Strong
St. Symeon
Theophylact
Friedrich Tholuck
James Ussher
Wm Warburton
Benjamin Warfield

Noah Webster
John Wesley
B.F. Westcott
Weymouth
William Whiston
N.T. Wright

John Wycliffe

 

Some Thoughts on Hyper-Preterism

By Richard Barcellos, Pastor

Introduction

Three critiques of Hyper-preterism have been very helpful to me: Dr. Ken Gentry's, Pastor Jim West's, and Pastor Fred Zaspel's. All three are available on the web. Jim West's came because of dealing with Hyper-preterism on a pastoral level and is most helpful for pastors. In addition, I hear Ken Gentry is working on a book-length critique and Canon Press is soon to release one as well. Jim Jordan recently did a conference on it and informed me (via an email and upon my asking) that he considers it heresy and a growing evil.

I will offer reasons from 1 Corinthians 15 why I agree with this assessment of Hyper-preterism. I view it as neo-Hymenaenism (2 Tm. 2:16-18), a damning heresy, idle babbling, a cancer which must be cut out immediately!

 

1 Corinthians 15 and Hyper-preterism

Paul's logic in 1 Corinthians 15 is very clear and emphatic:

1. Christ rose from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth (1 Cor. 15:1-5).

2. After the pattern of Christ, the first fruits, all who are His, that is, all Christians shall rise from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth (1 Cor. 15:20, 23).

3. This resurrection of all who are His occurs at His coming (1 Cor. 15:23, 24).

4. Denying that all Christians shall rise from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth, precludes the veracity of Christ rising from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth (1 Cor. 15:12-19). This is clearly Paul's logic.

5. Hyper-preterism denies the latter (a bodily and physical resurrection of all Christians, within space and time on the earth), therefore, it cannot have the former. An explicit denial of the future bodily resurrection of the saints is an implicit denial of a past resurrection of Christ, in the logic of Paul, which is God's. Hear Paul on the matter: "But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen." (1 Cor. 15:13) The "resurrection of the dead" throughout the context is a resurrection patterned after the first fruits, Christ (1 Cor. 15:20, 23). Since Christ's resurrection was bodily and physical, within space and time on the earth, then so will be that of all Christians. According to Paul, if it is true that all Christians do not rise from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth, then Christ Himself did not rise from the dead bodily and physically, within space and time on the earth, and our faith is futile and we are still in our sins (1 Cor. 15:13-19). Denying the bodily and physical resurrection of the saints ends up being a denial of the resurrection of Christ! The veracity of one depends upon the veracity of the other.

 

Conclusion

Denying, or not being able to affirm without qualification, a future bodily and physical resurrection of the saints precludes a past bodily resurrection of Christ according to the logic of Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:13. Moreover, no resurrection of Christ means our faith is in vain, we are still in our sins, and the gospel is destroyed. Hyper-preterism ends up denying an essential, core element of the gospel. Recall what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:1: "Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel …" First Corinthians 15 is an explication of Paul's gospel! Hyper-preterism denies one of the major tenets of the Pauline gospel. Hence, Hyper-preterism is heresy of the worst kind! It ends up denying the gospel itself! If one affirms Hyper-preterism, one denies the gospel. If one is with Hyper-preterism, one is without the gospel. If one is for Hyper-preterism, one is against the gospel.

In my thinking, this damning heresy is an evidence of the proneness toward novelty that many are driven to today. I believe the words of Calvin apply here when he said, "For there are always superstitious little fellows who dream up something new to win admiration for themselves." Let us rise to the occasion, stand for the old paths, speak the truth in love and boldness, and stop the mouths of idle talkers and deceivers who subvert households.

May the Lord purge His church of this new cancer which is, in actuality, a very old cancer. "But shun profane and idle babbling, for they will increase to more ungodliness. And their message will spread like cancer. Hymenaeus and Philetus are of this sort, who have strayed concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection is already past; and they overthrow the faith of some (2 Timothy 2:16-18).


What do YOU think ?

Send an email with your comments to todd @ preteristarchive.com
Be sure to include the article name. 
They will be posted shortly upon receipt
 


Date:
21 Jan 2004
Time:
15:26:35

Comments

The Bible says that "we are a chosen race a royal priesthood." Now, taking the above posters logic we should conclude that WE are JESUS! That is because if Jesus IS Israel and we IS Israel then we are Jesus?!?! more silliness from the hyper preterists


Date:
10 Jun 2004
Time:
13:43:34

Comments

I love this man. How can I reach him? He is a brother after my own heart and heretical preterists will never rest in the Body - excision is a must.


Date:
13 Nov 2004
Time:
17:41:10

Comments

To begin, I'm not the poster above. I'd like to look at 1 Corinthians 15 for a minute. 42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. 45 So also it is written, "The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL." The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual. 47 The first man is from the earth, earthy; the second man is from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 Just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the image of the heavenly. First, I'd like to draw attention to verse 32. "I affirm, brethren, by the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily." What?! If the death and resurrection of which you speak is physical, Paul died and miraculously revived EVERY DAY! Does that make sense? Yet it is only a prelude to the clarification he presents, which you have very conveniently left out. In these versus, which are spoken just moments after the references from your article, Paul draws a distinction between the nature of physical death and resurrection of men and the death and resurrection in Christ. 42 "So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body;" 44 "it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body." Paul is even more emphatic in his distinction between the physical and the spiritual. Look at verse 50. 50 "Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable." To state that Christ came and offered himself as the atonement for our sins merely to bring physical life is insulting to say the least. Christ himself denies the physical kingdom to which you cling. Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm." - John 18:36 "In my thinking, this damning heresy is an evidence of the proneness toward novelty that many are driven to today." Obviously tradition is more important than truth. "I love this man. How can I reach him? He is a brother after my own heart..." Then you both appear to be very hateful of those whome you believe are deceived. I would be embarrassed to be associated with such pharisees as you. On the other hand, I've seen little but love and outreach from preterists to futurists. What does that say to you? Perhaps that we are convinced that Christ is at work in this world while you believe Christ will abandon it. "...in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction." - 2 Peter 3:16 I pray that God's wisdom and understanding will be imparted to you and so improve all our testimony before men.

 

Click For Index Page

Free Online Books Historical Preterism Modern Preterism Study Archive Critical Articles Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main Josephus Church History Preterist Idealism

Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis  (todd @ preteristarchive.com) Opened in 1996
http://www.preteristarchive.com