|
|
|
| ![]() Website Color Key |
|
"Full Preterist" material is being archived for balanced representation of all Preterist views, but is classified under the theological term hyper (as in beyond the acceptable range of tolerable doctrines) at this website. The classification of all Full Preterism as Hyper Preterism is built upon well over a decade of intense research at PreteristArchive.com, and the convictions of the website curator (a former full preterist pastor). Beginning in 2006, it was recognized that the "spiritual resurrection past" view is toxic and cancerous, and also that it has been explicitly prosecuted since at least the days of Paul. This theology of resurrection with its dispensational line in AD70 (end of old age, start of new age) has never been according to the teachings found in Christianity throughout its entire history leading up to 1845, when the earliest known Full Preterist book was written. Even though there may be many secondary points of agreement between Historical/Modern Preterism and Hyper Preterism, the premises between them are undeniably and fundamentally different. On AD70 dispensational line: According to full preterism, AD70 was the end of the old age ('this age') and the start of the 'age to come'. The world which followed AD70 was fundamentally changed, according to the power and glory of the coming of Christ at the fall of Jerusalem. Accordingly, AD70 was not only the end of Old Testament Judaism, but it was also the end of the revelation of Christianity as seen in the New Testament. Those who lived before AD70 could only 'see in part' and such, lacking the resurrection and redemptive blessings which supposedly came only when Herod's Temple in Jerusalem fell. This is contrary to John's recording of Jesus seeing that 'all things had been fulfilled' and "It is finished" at the cross (Jn. 19) - not 40 years later.. |
|
SOME DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES OF SYSTEMATIZED HYPER PRETERISM It is important to keep in mind that many ideas and doctrines full preterism appeals to - such as the complete end of the Old Covenant world in AD70 - are by no means distinctive to that view. Many non HyPs believe this as well, so one need not embrace the Hyper Preterist system in order to endorse this view. Following are exceptional doctrines which, so far as I've seen, are only taught by adherents of Hyper Preterism.: DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES TAUGHT BY STANDARD FULL PRETERISM
DISTINCTIVE DOCTRINES TAUGHT BY VARIOUS FORMS
|
Why are People Still Given in Marriage? By Ward Fenley Here is an analysis of Luke 20. I hope this will answer the question of why people are still given in marriage today. In Luke 20 we read:
Whatever the Sadducees believed regarding the nature of the resurrection, it was obviously VERY close to, if not, a physical resurrection (i.e. whose WIFE shall SHE be etc.) In Matthew Jesus answers them FIRST with this statement:
This tells us something: Their view of resurrection was ENTIRELY erroneous. It is not a matter of them having the right view at all. Jesus answered them with the correct view.
There is no marriage. As we have seen, the transformation was transforming the first century believers from OC death and glory into NC life and glory (2 Corinthians 3:18; Hebrews 8:13; 9:6-12). But because they had already been given the Spirit, it could be said of them:
There is neither MALE NOR FEMALE, for they are all ONE IN Christ. This corresponds perfectly with Christ's statement that there is no marriage in the kingdom of heaven. We are all one in Christ and there is neither male nor female. His kingdom has nothing to do with this world, for His kingdom is not of this world. Therefore, the fact that there is still marriage in this physical life does not negate the fact that there is NOT marriage in the kingdom anymore than the fact that there are males and females in this physical life does not negate the fact that there are NOT males or females in the kingdom. Also, remember that they are like the angels. The angels are spirits and in Christ we are spirits just like Christ was raised a life-giving Spirit. Peter says Christ was put to death in the flesh and made alive in the spirit. Luke says:
There are TWO primary worlds or ages according to the Bible. Jesus described them as "this age" and "the age to come" or "the age about to come." Full preterists usually define the OC age as the "this age" of which Jesus spoke and the "age to come" as the New Covenant age. A question we must consider is, have we obtained that New Covenant age? Now, if those who affirm that physical death accomplishes the resurrection addressed in Luke 20 then, because they marry and are given in marriage, do they consider themselves children of the Old Covenant age? Furthermore, if they consider themselves SONS of THAT age, how is it from the passage that they conclude they have that age but have not obtained the resurrection? The passage also says:
What passages come to mind here?
Will we ever see death?
Will we ever die? There was only ONE death to be swallowed up in victory, therefore Christ had to be referring to this death. Keep in mind that this is the exact same situation in John 11. Christ was addressing a woman who had an errant view of the resurrection. Christ corrected her by saying "I AM the resurrection and the life." Just like Christ is the Bread, Water, Light, Life, Way, Truth, so also He IS the resurrection. This brings us to an important point. Consider this verse:
What was this hope?
So then, the hope of Israel was the resurrection. What does the Bible say the hope of Israel is?
Since the HOPE of Israel is the Lord, and since the hope of Israel was the resurrection, and since Christ IS the resurrection, then if we are IN Christ then we have partaken of the exact same resurrection blessings of Israel. After all, in the resurrection (In Christ) they are neither married nor given in marriage (male nor female), for they are all one in Christ:
Why were they already one? Because they were already given the Spirit at Pentecost, by which they were being transformed into Christ NC IMAGE and GLORY. They were being raised a spiritual body IN Christ. Therefore they could already be identified as one in Christ through this transforming work of the Holy Spirit.The passage in Luke then reads:
Notice that IN the resurrection or IN Christ they are the children of God:
Through the transforming work of the Spirit, Paul and the first century believers were already firstfruits of this same glorious resurrection of the OC body of death into the NC body of life IN Christ Jesus. They were the children of God. The whole purpose of the AD 70 event was to make MANIFEST the children of God (Romans 8:18-23). Christ was clear: IN the resurrection (IN Christ) they were the children of God:
Heirs of what promise? The promise for which Abraham looked. Abraham died in faith WITHOUT the promise of the better resurrection. He could not be made perfect (resurrected) without the firstfruits of the first century:
The difference between those living in the first century and those OT believers who had died is this-Jesus said:
Notice it is through FAITH IN Christ. Paul said:
Paul also seems to make this distinction between OT believers and first century believers, but nevertheless says they will all be manifested as the children of God. This would be the complete redemption of the OC body of death/law into the NC body of life or Christ:
The completion of the NC would result in the fullness of life for the first century believers who were being transformed (children of God) and the resurrection of OT believers into the glorious liberty of the children of God. Christ goes on to say in Luke:
There is a grave misinterpretation of the verse by some in saying that under the OT, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were "living." However, we must remember that the whole context begins with: "In the resurrection." Therefore when it says God is not a God of the dead but of the living, it is speaking of that time "in the resurrrection." The context is clear. In other words, in the resurrection:
1) They are as the angels It would be foolish to say he was the God of the living (the resurrection) during the time of Abraham. This would FORCE a difference in definitions of resurrection and "living." There is no such difference, neither does the passage even hint at such a difference. Finally Christ says, "In the resurrection…all LIVE UNTO HIM." Consider these passages:
It is incredible that Paul says RECKON or UNDERSTAND yourselves to be alive from the dead JUST LIKE Christ is alive from the dead. Because they had already been given the downpayment of the Spirit, they could already be dubbed as ALIVE from the dead since they were in fact being changed from their DYING mortal body of death (OC body of death) into the glorious image and body of Christ. Therefore they, LIKE CHRIST were to reckon themselves as ALIVE UNTO GOD. What did Christ say?
Paul confirms this:
At the destruction of Jerusalem Christ came to indwell His people and the fullness of their (OT believers and first century believers) were blessed with the fullness of the blessing of the Gospel of resurrection life in Christ Jesus, their Glory and their Resurrection. In heaven,
Ward
What do YOU think ? Date: 17 Aug 2006 Date: 28 May 2007 Comment: |
Email PreteristArchive.com's Sole Developer and Curator, Todd Dennis
(todd @ preteristarchive.com)
Opened in 1996 |