PRET ARCHIVE WWW

Crosswalk Bible Study Tools

Words/Verses:
Located Where:
 Which Version:  
  Tools!         HELP / OT Tools |NT Tools

Tools: WWSB | Google Books | TexCrit | Vine's | Gk-Lex-Alts-Vars | Aramaic-Lex-Lex2 | Gk/Hb Font | X-late | HYPERpreteristarchive.com


Website Color Key


Preterist Charts


Nigel Cawthorne - History's Greatest Battles: Masterstrokes of War (2005 PDF) Jerusalem, Defending the Temple - AD70 (p. 31-)  "By crushing Jewish resistance in Jerusalem, the Romans consolidated their eastern empire, driving Jews out of their homeland in a diaspora that has religious and political consequences to this day."

Henry Burton Sharman - The Teaching of Jesus About the Future (1908 PDF)


 

FREE ONLINE BOOKS

   
 


Avalon Hill
"Siege of Jerusalem"
Board Game

Check Ebay

DOWNLOAD SIEGE OF JERUSALEM PROGRAM

Siege of Jerusalem, The

Siege of Jerusalem, The

Reviews | Discussion Board | AH Ludography

Articles on Siege of Jerusalem (AH)

The General

  • 24-5,The Coming Siege,Designer's Notes,37,A Preview of Siege of Jerusalem,Don Greenwood
  • 26-4,Laying the Foundation,Historical Backgrnd,6,Historical Background to Siege of Jerusalem,Stephen Weiss
  • 26-4,Building the Structure,Designer's Notes,10,Design Notes to Siege of Jerusalem,Fred Schachter
  • 26-4,Before and Behind the Walls,Analysis,16,The Armies of Siege of Jerusalem,James Werbaneth

FIRE & MOVEMENT Magazine
 

  • F&M #25 - Anatomy of a Siege: The Siege of Jerusalem 70.A.D. (Historical Perpectives): Kim Turner (Game Profile)
     
  • F&M #64 - The Siege of Jerusalem: Jim Werbaneth (Player's Notes)
     
  • F&M #66 - The Siege of Jerusalem: James P. Werbaneth (Profile)

CASUS BELLI Magazine (french language)
 

  • CB #57 - Siege Of Jerusalem: une tragédie classique: Pierre Gioux (Quick Test)

 

Free Online Books

Free Online Books



Apocalyptic | Apocryphal | Archeology | Lectures | Biographies | Dead Sea Scrolls | First Century History | Foreign | Jewish Sources | Josephus

Click for PreteristArchive.com Home

Instaverse Bible Verse and Commentary Lookup

Click For Site Updates Page

Free Online Books Page

Historical Preterism Main

Modern Preterism Main

Preterist Idealism Main

Critical Article Archive Main

Church History's Preteristic Presupposition

Study Archive Main

Dispensationalist dEmEnTiA  Main

Josephus' Wars of the Jews Main

Online Study Bible Main

 1-1000

070: Clement: First Epistle of Clement

075: Baruch: Apocalypse Of Baruch

075: Barnabus: Epistle of Barnabus

090: Esdras 2 / 4 Ezra

100: Odes of Solomon

150: Justin: Dialogue with Trypho

150: Melito: Homily of the Pascha

175: Irenaeus: Against Heresies

175: Clement of Alexandria: Stromata

198: Tertullian: Answer to the Jews

230: Origen: The Principles | Commentary on Matthew | Commentary on John | Against Celsus

248: Cyprian: Against the Jews

260: Victorinus: Commentary on the Apocalypse "Alcasar, a Spanish Jesuit, taking a hint from Victorinus, seems to have been the first (AD 1614) to have suggested that the Apocalyptic prophecies did not extend further than to the overthrow of Paganism by Constantine."

310: Peter of Alexandria

310: Eusebius: Divine Manifestation of our Lord

312: Eusebius: Proof of the Gospel

319: Athanasius: On the Incarnation

320: Eusebius: History of the Martyrs

325: Eusebius: Ecclesiastical History

345: Aphrahat: Demonstrations

367: Athanasius: The Festal Letters

370: Hegesippus: The Ruin of Jerusalem

386: Chrysostom: Matthew and Mark

387: Chrysostom: Against the Jews

408: Jerome: Commentary on Daniel

417: Augustine: On Pelagius

426: Augustine: The City of God

428: Augustine: Harmony

420: Cassian: Conferences

600: Veronica Legend

800: Aquinas: Eternity of the World

 


1000-2006

FUTURIST
HISTORICAL
MODERN

1265: Aquinas: Catena Aurea

1543: Luther: On the Jews

1555: Calvin: Harmony on Evangelists

1556: Jewel: Scripture

1586: Douay-Rheims Bible

1598: Jerusalem's Misery ; The dolefull destruction of faire Ierusalem by Tytus, the Sonne of Vaspasian

1603: Nero : A New Tragedy

1613: Carey: The Fair Queen of Jewry

1614: Alcasar: Vestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi

1654: Ussher: The Annals of the World

1658: Lightfoot: Commentary from Hebraica

1677: Crowne - The Destruction of Jerusalem

1764: Lardner: Fulfilment of our Saviour's Predictions

1776: Edwards: History of Redemption

1785: Churton: Prophecies Respecting the Destruction of Jerusalem

1801: Porteus - Our Lord's Prophecies

1802: Nisbett: The Coming of the Messiah

1805: Jortin: Remarks on Ecclesiastical History

1810: Clarke: Commentary On the Whole Bible

1816: Wilkins: Destruction of Jerusalem Related to Prophecies

1824: Galt: The Bachelor's Wife

1840: Smith: The Destruction of Jerusalem

1841: Currier: The Second Coming of Christ

1842: Bastow : A (Preterist) Bible Dictionary

1842: Stuart: Interpretation of Prophecy

1843: Lee: Dissertations on Eusebius

1845: Stuart: Commentary on Apocalypse

1849: Lee: Inquiry into Prophecy

1851: Lee: Visions of Daniel and St. John

1853: Newcombe - Observations on our Lord's Conduct as Divine Instructor

1854: Chamberlain: Restoration of Israel

1854: Fairbairn: The Typology of Scripture

1859: "Lee of Boston" - Eschatology

1861: Maurice - Lectures on the Apocalypse

1863: Thomas Lewin : The Siege of Jerusalem

1865: Desprez: Daniel (Renounced Full Preterism)

1870: Fall of Jerusalem and the Roman Conquest

1871: Dale - Jewish Temple and Christian Church (PDF)

1879: Warren: The Parousia

1882: Farrar: The Early Days of Christianity

1883: Milton S. Terry - Biblical Hermeneutics

1888: Henty: For The Temple

1891: Farrar: Scenes in the days of Nero

1896: Lee : A Scholar of a Past Generation

1900: Urmy - Christ Came Again (1900)

1902: Church: Story of the Last Days of Jerusalem

1917: Morris: Christ's Second Coming Fulfilled

1985: Lee: Jerusalem; Rome; Revelation (PDF)

1987: Chilton: The Days of Vengeance

2001: Fowler: Jesus - The Better Everything

2006: M. Gwyn Morgan - AD69 - The Year of Four Emperors

Print and Use For Personal Bookmark or Placement in Bookstores


 

 


Avalon Hill
"Siege of Jerusalem"
Board Game

First Edition 1976 / Revision 1989


Siege of Jerusalem, The


INTRODUCTION

Can you, as Eliezar Ben Yair, rally Jerusalem's defenders to exact a fearful price on the besiegers, or escape to fulfill your destiny at Masada? Can you, as Cestius Gallus, quell the revolt at its source and take Jerusalem with a single legion? It is 70 A.D. Dawn breaks on the combined might of four Legions arrayed on the heights of Mount Scopus, starting their methodical advance across the valley to the ancient walled city of Jerusalem. Siege lines have been secured tight about the city. There is no hope of escape. The besieged must persist behind their stout walls or perish before a vengeful Rome. Five grueling years of campaigning in Judea is now culminating in the Siege of Jerusalem.

But the fortified city defies even the might of Rome. The thick walls atop the steep slopes literally bristle with natural and manmade fortifications. It will take all of Rome's considerable engineering skills to winch their war machines into position for an assault up the slopes to the city. Only here in the north plain can the city's walls be taken by escalade. The rhythmic approach of the Legions is muted by the rumble of the siege engines as an assortment of towers, rams, and artillery precede the maniples. The distant walls seethe with the frenzied activity of an alerted populace as the antagonists draw near. This majestic view is abruptly halted by the blare of trumpets which soon gives way to the cacophony of the clash of arms and screams of the dying.

Morning turns to dusk before the walls are breached and the weary legions exact their vengeance. The sky turns bright again, aglow in the reflection of a thousand fires as the northern outskirts burn. But what price victory? Another day such as this will break the Roman Army and only one of the city's ten walled sections has fallen this day. They will have to find another way. Shafts must be dug to undermine the walls or earthen ramps built with which to scale them. It will be a long campaign.

This is The Siege of Jerusalem...An epic battle simulation with all the trappings and majesty of a Cecil B. DeMille film spectacular. Facing the greatest army of antiquity, the Judeans must rely on the stoutness of their walls to halt the unbeatable Roman legions and therein lies the fascination: the immovable object vs the unstoppable force. As Eliezar Ben Yair, leader of the Zealots, you must conduct a skilled defense of the city's ever shrinking perimeter - exacting from the Romans a price so terrible that they will be forced to lift their siege - or break out to continue your struggle for freedom at Massada. As Titus, commander of the Roman army, you must decide when, where and how to renew the assault - gauging your troop needs against the progress of your siege works and the press of time caused by outside threats. More than just conducting tactical combat, the Roman must formulate an overall strategic plan for the conduct of the siege.

Vastly revised from its initial printing of the 70's, Siege of Jerusalem now boasts two-sided counters, a continuous combat system, a strategic interphase for conducting the entire siege, and the morale / panic rules so important in portraying ancient warfare. An Introductory Scenario depicting the abortive assault of Gallus with the XII Legion three years previous allows players to learn how to handle a legion in a single day's play while training for eventual participation in the conduct of the epic siege.


The Siege of Jerusalem: Scenarios
By Fred Schachter

The original Siege of Jerusalem game published as an “Amateur Release” by Steve Weiss and I back in 1976 (wow! over a quarter century ago!) had several scenarios omitted from The Avalon Hill Game Company’s 1989 version.  Thanks to Multi-Man Publishing’s resuming distribution of the game, an opportunity to rectify this omission is hereby remedied.

This article contains three scenarios.   One, “The Rebellion”, was included within the 1976 edition. The second, also provided with the original game, is a variation of “The Rebellion” and the third a special “First Assault Period” scenario just for those of you who acquired Siege of Jerusalem via Multi-Man Publishing.  The hoped for interest and enjoyment of these scenarios are:

 

A)    “The Rebellion”: A five turn game (compare that to the length and time-consumption of a “Full Siege Campaign Game”) which pits Roman Procurator Gessius Florus’ Jerusalem garrison against hordes of armed and outraged Judeans determined to expunge Imperial Rome’s authority from their holy city.  This scenario’s action takes place inside Jerusalem… giving players a rather different perspective of the city from what it assumes during a “Full Siege Campaign Game”.

B)     “Delayed Rebellion / Quick Roman Response”: A seven turn “what if” scenario which allows both the Romans & Judeans to be on the offensive.  The Judeans attack as during “The Rebellion” scenario by trying to force Rome’s Garrison out of Jerusalem.  The Romans then have their opportunity to attack when Legio XII “Fulminata” force-marches to their beleaguered comrades aid from off-map under leadership of Rome’s Syrian Provincial Governor, Cestius Gallus.  This is “The Assault of Gallus” scenario within a plausible “what if” historical framework making for a novel, fascinating, game situation.

C)    “The First Assault Period Scenario”: This permits players to experience the grand scope of a “Full Siege Campaign Game” by resolving a single Assault Period as a game unto itself.  This scenario explores some alternative interpretations of the historical event.

 

All these scenarios use Siege of Jerusalem’s standard rules as a base with, as seems inevitable with scenarios, special rules which I’ve tried to keep to a minimum.  Designer and Player Notes are also provided.

Hope these scenarios enhance player appreciation of the overall Siege of Jerusalem game and do, above all, provide some enjoyable gaming experiences.  Special thanks to the “Rockland Guys” gaming group for their help play testing these scenarios.  Believe it or not, we wargame each week in New City, N.Y., following traditional weekly gaming sessions going back to our youth in “Da Bronx”.  Furthermore, my birthday is June 8th… the anniversary of the 66 A.D. Jerusalem Revolt depicted within the scenario herewith provided.

Scenarios are presented in chronological order:

“THE REBELLION”

Introduction & Historical Notes:

In June 66 A.D., the depredations of Gessius Florus, Imperial Rome’s Procurator in Jerusalem, had driven an already desperate Judean populace into open revolt.  Judean freedom-fighters, many of whom were secretly armed for quite some time, rallied to their respective factions leaders.

Florus’ garrison was primarily composed of foreign Velitae and Foederatti, soldiers of King Herod Agrippa II: Rome’s local client King.  He had relatively few “reliable” regular Legionnaires available… but what Imperial Heavy Infantry Florus had would prove utterly fearsome to the ill-armed and trained Judeans.  Most of the garrison’s light infantry was spread about the city, manning peacetime positions within Jerusalem’s various gates.  The tough, disciplined, Heavy Infantry was split between Antonia Fortress and Herod’s Palace.

Isolated fort and gate garrisons swiftly fell to the numerous, enraged, and vengeful Judeans.  After parrying a tentative Roman advance upon the Temple; a Judean horde from Jerusalem’s southern quarters overwhelmed Antonia Fortress.

Surviving Roman & Foederatti forces fell back to Herod’s Palace.  This enabled a coalesced defense of that walled area which proved too much for the rag-tag Judeans to take head-on.

A truce was called.  After some weeks of negotiation, what remained of Rome’s Jerusalem garrison was afforded “The Honors of War” and allowed to depart the city.  Jerusalem and it’s holy Temple was at last free of foreign troops!

USE ALL STANDARD RULES PER SIEGE OF JERUSALEM’S REGULAR RULEBOOK unless modified or overridden by this scenario’s special instructions.  

Roman Forces & Set-up:

The Roman Player sets-up first in accordance with the following Order of Battle and set-up instructions.  Use playing pieces from any Siege of Jerusalem Legion except the XII (Legio XII “Fulminata” should be set aside).

  1. Antonia Fortress Garrison:  four (4) catapult units, one in each Antonia Fortress fort hex.  The following nine (9) units may be placed in any hex of Antonia Fortress or its walls, including those congruent to The Temple, subject to stacking limits: one Heavy Infantry Cohort consisting of a 7-8, 6-8, & 5-8; three (3) 3-9 Velitae, and three (3) 1-9 Syrian Archers.

  1. Herod’s Palace Garrison:  The following nine (9) units may be placed in any hex of Herod’s Palace and/or “The Fortress Triangle”, on or within the walls.  Additionally, Herod’s Palace garrison units may optionally occupy gate hexes of Yafo Gate Complex: one Heavy Infantry Cohort consisting of a 7-8, 6-8, & 5-8; three (3) 3-9 Velitae, and three (3) 1-9 Syrian Archers.

  1. Optional Placement Garrison Units: consist of twenty-four (24) units, one Heavy Infantry Cohort consisting of a 7-8, 6-8, and 5-8, three (3) 3-9  Velitae, and eighteen (18) 2-10 Foederatti.  Deploy these in the following sequence:

3.1  All Jerusalem gate hexes, with the exception of those of the Temple Quarter’s inner and exterior walls, MUST be garrisoned (occupied) by at least one optional placement unit of the Roman Player’s choice.  Remember, the Temple Quarter’s gates must be left empty of Roman units.

3.2  After fulfilling 3.1’s “Gate Garrison” requirement, all still unallocated Roman optional placement units may go into:

A)    Any fort or fortress hex, except those of the Temple Quarter, Antonia Fortress, and/or Herod’s Palace garrison (i.e. they can’t reinforce item 1 or 2’s placements).  Yafo Gate Complex placement is permitted.

B)    Any built-up / non-edifice hex of Jerusalem.

When all Roman built-up hex unit placement is complete, every Jerusalem built-up hex which is not occupied by a Roman unit immediately becomes Judean controlled! (This is a critical point to setting up Judean forces for this scenario.)

Judean Forces and their Set-up on the Map:

The Judean Player sets-up second per the following Order of Battle and “set-up” instructions.  Use all Siege of Jerusalem Judean 7-7 Zealot, 5-7 Regular, and 2-6 Militia with their faction leaders as a “pool” for possible Judean forces.  Do not place Garrison (purple), artillery/cauldrons, or the Eliezar ben Yair Commander Unit into this “pool”.

  1. Judean Placement Reserve Activation:

1.1  The Judean Player first places the four (4) Faction Leader units on the map:

A)    Each must be placed within ANY Judean-controlled built-up terrain hex (see 1.3).

B)    No more than two Judean Leaders may ever occupy a single Jerusalem Area for purpose of Reserve Activation (see 1.3).

1.2  Reserve Activation, per Siege of Jerusalem Rule 18.611, then takes place.  IMPORTANT: In this scenario, there are no “Judean Reserve Activation Modifiers”.  Just use the straight unmodified die/dice Reserve roll for each applicable city area without DRM.

1.3  Normal Reserve Activation is followed by a Special Judean Leader Reserve 

      Activation:

A)    Each Judean Leader (exception, 1.1B) occupying a built-up/non-edifice hex not adjacent to or in an L.O.F. of a Roman unit may activate additional reserves every Judean Rally Phase.

B)    Each applicable Leader receives a two dice Reserve release roll:

·        Use the regular Siege of Jerusalem Activation Table (18.611) to determine the type of units to take out of the “pool”.

·        However, for this and ensuing Special Judean Leader Reserve Activations, only units of that particular Leader, or Zealot 7-7’s, may be taken from the pool.  If no 5-7’s or 2-6’s of that faction Leader are available from the pool or dead box when needed; these units may not be taken (may not accumulate untaken Reserves).

C)    Special Reserve Activation may not be prevented by Roman control of an area (see special rules defining “control” of a Jerusalem area for this scenario… Rule 8) during:

·        Initial Reserve Placements AND

·        Turn One’s Judean Rally Phase.  Thereafter, Roman control of a Jerusalem area will prevent new Judean Reserves from both regular and Special Leader sources from being taken.

1.4  IMPORTANT! There are no Reserve Limits (Siege of Jerusalem Rule 18.612). Players have no need to track activated Judean Reserve units by hash mark.

  1. After Initial Placement Reserve Activations are taken, “The Rebellion” Scenario begins with Turn One’s Judean Rally Phase (consequently, each applicable Jerusalem city area will get two full cycles of Reserve Activations before the Roman Player gets first chance to respond with Turn Two). 

SPECIAL RULES

1.      All roads outside Jerusalem exist.  Movement rates along roads outside Jerusalem, whether in clear or slope terrain, is ½ MP for both Roman & Judean Units.

 

2.      Roman Refuge (Siege of Jerusalem rule 15.4) is any Roman-controlled area of the city or a map edge… whichever is closest to an effected Roman unit when it retreats.  If more than one refuge area is equidistant, choice is the Roman Player’s.

3.      Judean Unit Disruption: Only Zealot 7-7 and Leader Units may be disrupted by fire and/or melee combat in this scenario.  Other Judean units: 5-7’s and/or 2-6’s are immediately ELIMINATED when disrupted.

4.      Judean Escalade Ability: Judean units within Jerusalem, from any ground level hex (including built-up & edifice hexes) may make escalade attacks and movement per all regular Siege of Jerusalem escalade rules usually effecting only the Roman Player.  Any Judean unit may serve as an escalade “base”.  The Judeans may not make escalade attacks from a hex outside the city.  The Romans, of course, may continue to do so with any appropriate units.

5.      Roman Cohort Integrity (Siege of Jerusalem rule 11.841):

5.1 Cohort Integrity’s +1/-1 DRM applies to any melee combat involving at least one fresh Roman Heavy Infantry.

5.2 Should all three units (7-8, 6-8, & 5-8) of a particular Cohort attack the same hex, even if from different hexes, an additional Cohort Integrity Bonus applies: shift the odds of that melee combat two columns in the Romans’ favor… for example, a 1 to 1 becomes a 3 to 1 melee attack.  There is no odds shift bonus for a Cohort on melee defense.

6.      Roman Hesitation to Attack the  Temple: No Roman unit may enter a hex of the Temple Quarter or its perimeter walls (except those hexes which are congruent to Antonia Fortress) until Turn Three.  This is a political restriction… although some legend has it that the Romans hesitated through intervention of other “forces”.

7.      Command Control:

7.1 Judean – In addition to the four (4) Leaders, each Zealot 7-7 unit may serve as a Leader for any faction’s 5-7 and 2-6 units.  Zealots, however, do not convey Rally DRM’s.

7.2 Roman – Gessius Florus was ineffective as a military commander and is consequently not represented by a Playing Piece.  What Roman Leadership there was came from the tough and highly trained officers and Centurions of Jerusalem’s Legionnaire Garrison.   Consequently…

A)    Each Heavy Infantry (7-8,6-8, 5-8) may serve as a Leader capable of providing “cc” to any non-Heavy Infantry Roman unit on the map.

B)     As Leaders, Roman Heavy Infantry may provide Rally DRM’s (although a single disrupted Heavy Infantry cannot provide itself with Rally DRM – any other undisrupted Heavy Infantry in range could: a maximum of one unit can provide Rally DRM to any Rally Die Roll.

C)    Heavy Infantry units themselves require no command control.

8.      Controlling Jerusalem City Areas (use this rule in lieu of Siege of Jerusalem 18.3):

8.1 Unless a city area is controlled by the Roman Player, per rule section 8.2, it is automatically presumed to be Judean controlled.

8.2 Roman Control of Jerusalem City Areas:

A)    The Temple – is Roman controlled at the end of any Judean Melee Phase with at least one of its edifice hexes occupied by at least one fresh Roman unit of any type.

B)     Tyropean City, New City, David’s City, Upper & Lower Cities – can be Roman controlled with at least ten (10) of an area’s unnamed built-up hexes occupied by ten (10) fresh Roman units of any type within the area’s walls.

C)    Antonia Fortress – The Romans control Antonia Fortress by preventing Judean occupation of both its edifice hexes (barracks) and at least two of its fortress hexes.

D)    Herod’s Palace – The Romans control this area by preventing Judean occupation of any of its edifice hexes by game’s end.

 

SCENARIO TIME LIMIT & VICTORY CONDITIONS

1.      Time Limit:

1.1  “The Rebellion” Scenario is not a Full Siege Game Assault Period.  Consequently, Players ignore all special ending an Assault Period early rules.

1.2  The scenario is played until Turn Five’s Judean Melee Phase’s conclusion, unless a Roman automatic victory is achieved (see 2.2A), at which time Players assess which side has won.

 

2.      Victory Conditions:

2.1    Judean Victory.

A)    The Romans control one Jerusalem city area = Judean Historic Victory.

B)     The Romans do not control any area of Jerusalem = Judean Decisive Victory.  Achieving this is an interesting historical speculation; for what could or would have happened had the Judean Revolutionary Government been able to give more immediate attention to better preparing the city and Province against inevitable Roman counter-attack?

2.2    Roman Victory

A)    Should the Romans end any game turn in control of the Temple Quarter, the game immediately ends with a Roman victory.

B)     The Romans may also win the scenario by controlling two or more Jerusalem areas by the end of play (per 8.2’s B, C, or D).

DESIGNER & PLAYERS NOTES

The Judean Army, such as it was at this time, is numerous but quite brittle (i.e. Regulars and Militia are eliminated when disrupted).  Lack of City Area Reserve Limits and Faction Leaders’ ability to raise reserve units themselves compensate for this weakness.

Although Rebel advance preparation, planning, stockpiled material, and knowledge of the city allow them to make interior escalade attacks in this scenario; it is very difficult for them to overcome any defended wall line without “clouds” of projectiles for firepower support.  If the Romans have reserves to replace their disrupted wall defenders, a Judean assault, as they found historically at Herod’s Palace, can be thwarted with relative ease.

In short, Judean strategy is responsive to what the Romans do with their “Optional Placement” units.  The Judean Player must hope for good Reserve release die rolling where and when needed: although there’s so much reserve dice rolling that things should “average out” and the Judeans find themselves with a truly huge army containing numerous units capable of attritioning down to size the qualitatively superior Roman Imperial Garrison.  There can be a bit of a dilemma knowing when Leaders are best left in the rear, raising fresh reserves, or being at the fighting front where their combat bonus could be telling.  Playing experience should indicate optimal use.

For the Romans, their deployment of “Optional Placement” units is critical.  Two basic strategies are available to the Garrison: 1) Abandon Jerusalem’s built-up sections and adopt a “cordon” defense centered on gates.  This segments the city and if Judean Reserve die rolling is poor for a particular area, greatly impede enemy offensive movement & momentum.

The other Roman Placement Strategy is: 2) Concentrate “Optional Placement” units to control a built-up area of Jerusalem.  This restricts the Judeans to only their Leader Units Reserve die rolling for that area and then no more after Turn One (assuming the Romans retain control).  The Judeans could contest this strategy by placing a Leader or two in the area; but if they get poor Reserve dice rolling, the Romans could swiftly crush the Rebels and eliminate a crucial Leader.  The downside of this approach is it exposes Roman units to some possibly most nasty close-in street fighting.

However, “The Rebellion” is the scenario where Roman Heavy Infantry possess a tremendously potent tactical superiority.  Free of “cc” (command control) restrictions, the Roman Player will find the Legionnaires virtually unstoppable if in sufficient numbers for a given situation… of course that’s the catch, since the Romans will generally find themselves heavily outnumbered.

Finally, if you’re trying to control a Jerusalem built-up area but finding the effort flagging, know when to “cut and run” back to the walls of those areas still Roman-held (i.e. Herod’s Palace).  There’s no sense giving the Judeans additional Reserve Release Die rolling by triggering regular releases, through Roman units being within a city area, in addition to those they receive via Leaders.

“DELAYED REBELLION / QUICK ROMAN RESPONSE SCENARIO”

Introduction & Historical Notes:

A fascinating aspect of our wargaming hobby is its ability to allow experimenting with “what if’s”.

The Judean Rebellion against Imperial Rome in 66 A.D. offers an interesting and plausible “what if” in-so-far as Jerusalem was concerned.  What if the Rebels delayed their assault on the city’s garrison (i.e. to better prepare or due to worse than actual in-fighting amongst Judean Factions)?

Of course the longer the Rebels waited, the greater likelihood of the Romans, who were no slouches… they did have spies & informers among the populace, discovering what was afoot and taking counter-measures.

The supposition behind this scenario is that the Judeans do delay their Jerusalem revolt, the Romans get wind of imminent armed hostilities and are in process of force marching a Legion of the Syrian Provincial Garrison south as reinforcement when the Rebels realize it’s “now or never” and take to the streets.

Can the Judeans wrest Jerusalem from Rome before the Legio XII “Fulminata” under Gallus, Governor of Syria, reinforces Florus’ garrison who could then crush the revolt?

Scenario Rules are the same as “The Rebellion” save as modified herein:

Roman Forces

Add to the Roman Order of Battle the entire XII Legion “Fulminata”, without Siege Towers, and with Gallus in command in lieu of the usual Legate (Leader Unit).  Remember, Gallus is a Commander Unit.

The following rules 1&2 apply to Legio XII “Fulminata” units. Rule 3 to the Jerusalem Garrison’s Heavy Infantry (7-8, 6-8,5-8’s)

1.      Legio XII Heavy Infantry Units: Due to the effects of their long forced march and unfamiliarity with the city, the Legion’s Heavy Infantry do not have special DRM modifiers or Leader ability like Jerusalem’s Garrison Heavy Infantry.  Treat XII Legion’s Heavy Infantry as in the regular Siege of Jerusalem game.

2.      Arrival: XII Legion’s arrival is at the Roman Player’s discretion subject to the following Table.

Roman Movement

Anywhere on

Anywhere on

Anywhere on

Phase of . . .

North Map Edge

East or West Edge

South Map Edge

 

 

 

 

Turn Two

Gallus, Cav & all Lt. Inf.

N/A

N/A

 

 

 

 

Turn Three

ALL AVAILABLE

Gallus, Cav & all Lt. Inf.

N/A

 

 

 

 

Turn Four

ALL AVAILABLE

ALL AVAILABLE

Gallus, Cav & all Lt. Inf.

 

 

 

 

Turn Five

ALL AVAILABLE

ALL AVAILABLE

ALL AVAILABLE

      

2.1 Once a map edge is chosen, all XII Legion units must arrive from that map edge.

      2.2 The Roman Player, to keep the Judeans guessing, may delay arrival of the Legion. 

            For example, the entire XII Legion could arrive from North Map Edge Turn Four.    

 

3. Jerusalem Garrison Heavy Infantry: In this scenario, Garrison Heavy Infantry only receive the two column melee combat shift when all three units of a cohort attack out of the same hex.  Other than this one change, all Rebellion Scenario rules for the Garrison’s Heavy Infantry continue to apply.

 

Judean Forces

1.      Add to the Judean Order of Battle all Cauldron units of Siege of Jerusalem’s counter mix.

1.1  On a Reserve Activation Table (18.611) die roll result of six (6) a Cauldron may be taken in lieu of a Zealot 7-7 unit.  A new Cauldron unit may be placed, subject to stacking limits, within any Judean-controlled Bastion/Bastion Gate or Fort/Fortress Gate adjacent to the city area Reserve Release rolled for.

1.2  Like Judean 5-7 & 2-6 units, Cauldrons are eliminated rather than disrupted (whether from fire or melee combat) in this scenario.  They receive Command Control as Regulars/Militia.

2.      Use the following JUDEAN RESERVE ACTIVATION DIE ROLL MODIFIERS (DRM’S) for this scenario.  All DRM’s are cumulative.

      

"Delayed Rebellion / Quick Roman Response" Scenario: Judean Reserve Activation DRM's

DRM

Cause

plus 1

Activating in Upper or Lower Cities or The City of David Areas

plus 1

Judeans control Temple Quarter with no Roman unit(s) on or within its exterior walls.

plus 1

New City and/or Tyropean City not under Roman control

minus 4

At least one fresh Roman unit is within the Temple Quarter's exterior wall perimeter.

SPECIAL RULES (Remember, all rules are the same as “The Rebellion” scenario save as modified herein.)

1. Units Outside Jerusalem:

1.1  The Roman Garrison, awaiting relief and reinforcement by Gallus’ Legion, is assumed to be under orders not to leave Jerusalem.  Conversely, concern with the imminent arrival of XII Legion would keep the Judeans within the city as well.  Consequently…

1.2  Until at least one unit of XII Legion is placed upon the map, no Judean or Roman Jerusalem Garrison unit may voluntarily leave the city’s interior or wall hexes except as a result of melee combat.  Once a retreating unit is outside the city, the owning Player may do with it as per all normal Siege of Jerusalem rules. It is then under no special restriction.

2. Time Limit: The scenario is played until Turn Seven’s Judean Melee Phase conclusion (day’s end); at which time victory condition is assessed.  Ignore all special ending an

     Assault Period early rules.

 

3. Victory Conditions are solely based on how many areas of Jerusalem under Roman  control at the conclusion of the scenario.

    3.1 Instant Roman Victory: All play immediately ends should any Judean Melee Phase            conclude with the Romans in control of The Temple.

    3.2 Otherwise, play through Turn Seven’s Judean Melee Phase’s.  Then…

A)    Romans control any three (3) Jerusalem areas = Roman Victory

B)     Romans control any two (2) Jerusalem areas = Draw (This is the worst possible result for the city’s populace.)

C)    Romans control one or no Jerusalem area = Judean Victory.

PLAYERS NOTES

  Within the group of gamers with whom I tested these scenarios, the “Delayed Rebellion / Quick Roman Response” is one of our favorite Siege of Jerusalem scenarios.

To be sure, the Judeans have lots of unit raising die/dice rolling as is the case with “The Rebellion” scenario (just have a healthy handful of dice available).  However, Players will notice that with both “The Rebellion” and “Delayed Rebellion / Quick Roman Response” scenarios this dice rolling takes care of itself by mid-game, when most Judean Pool Units are on the map.  Thereafter, regardless of the Judeans’ potential for new units… there’ll simply be inadequate pieces in the “Pool”.  It’s then a question of whether those units on the map are in the right place at the right time; and that’s where the fascination of the “Delayed Rebellion / Quick Roman Response” scenario can really come into play.

For this is a scenario giving both the Judean and Roman sides opportunities to be on the strategic and tactical offense.  As with “The Rebellion”, the Romans initial placement of Jerusalem Garrison units is critical.

In this scenario, foreknowledge of XII Legion’s eventual arrival makes a “Cordon Defense” a viable Roman strategic option.  The value of Garrison units surviving in Yafo Gate, Women’s Gate or the southern Gate of the Essenes when XII Legion arrives should be readily apparent. 

The Judeans’ task is complicated by having to deal with Rome’s Jerusalem Garrison while simultaneously securing city gates and walls against XII Legion.  If a gate cannot be seized and held outright, the Judeans should mass as many 5-7 Regulars as they can gather around and behind it.  This may dissuade a XII Legion attack, or at least slow it down.  Occasionally, the Judeans may be successful luring the XIIth into attacking from an approach it will have great difficulty exploiting.

As for the Romans… I’ll let others write suggestions as to “best play”. 

 

“THE FIRST ASSAULT PERIOD SCENARIO”

 Introduction & Historical Notes:

When researching and designing an ancients game, which Siege of Jerusalem certainly is, alternate historical interpretations can be explored.  Furthermore, this “First Assault Period Scenario” is a kind of “Full Siege Game” unto itself… resolvable in a single Assault Period.  So if you and your opponent(s) don’t have time or inclination to play a “Full Siege Game” through, this should serve as something of an alternative.  It will certainly reveal insights to many “Full Siege Game” playing considerations and provide a gaming session with the full scope and grandeur of attacking one of the Ancient World’s best fortified cities… Jerusalem!

The design of the boxed Avalon Hill Siege of Jerusalem “Full Siege Campaign Game”

Allows the Romans complete freedom of action in deciding how much time to spend mining.  With experience, many Roman Players will elect to use as little time possible, expressed in “weeks before Assault” on Siege of Jerusalem’s Preparation Chart to achieve 3 or 4 main mine shafts as preparation for the 1st Assault Period.

In this respect the Roman Player is in the role of Titus.  However, with this scenario we’ll put the Roman Player in the role of Titus’ Chief of Staff, Tiberius Alexander, and compel closer adherence to Titus’, as well as many of this officers, historical attitude towards Jerusalem and its Judean defenders.

This does not invalidate the “Full Siege Campaign Game’s” design approach.  It is, along with Judean “Increased Factionalism” rules built into this “First Assault Period” scenario, another alternative interpretation of the event.  These two new design elements are:

1.      Roman Confidence:  Many of the Legionnaires, as well as their officers, believed either through a misguided interpretation of Jerusalem’s defenses, their enemies’ capabilities & determination, or just plain arrogance; that four fully readied Imperial Roman Legions would swiftly crush Judean resistance within the city.  Consequently, little time was spent “Preparing” (at least in relative Siege of Jerusalem game terms).

                                  AND

2.   Increased Judean Factionalism: Although we won’t go so far as having different factions actually fight one another; there’s little doubt that historically Judean factions concern with politics external to the fight against Rome did impact Rebel military effectiveness.  In this scenario’s interpretation, no neighborhood of the city wishes to be without defenders and vociferously protests reduction or loss of their  protection. 

    

      This is reflected by the Inactive/Active Factions & Judean Initial Placement rules.   The Romans’ knowledge of the Judean initial placement’s basic pattern reflects that  they have some idea of their enemy’s deployment through their own observations,  spies, and/or Judean Roman-Sympathizers.

 

Roman & Judean Forces with their Set-Up on Map

1.      Refer to “The Full Siege Campaign Game” Card provided with Siege of Jerusalem for both sides Order of Battle details.

2.      Conduct the Card’s set-up steps 3 (Judean secretly records artillery positions) and then step 5 (Roman sets-up units on or off map) ONLY.  NEXT . . .

3.      The Roman Player may now complete one main mine shaft resolution.  There are no Judean repairs possible.  No other “Assault Period Interphase” actions take place.  Use regular Siege of Jerusalem mining rules.

4.      After the Romans have set-up and resolved their one main mine shaft, the Judeans place their surviving artillery in their pre-recorded positions and place their four factions units on the map, one faction for each listed deployment zone:

4.1  The deployment zones are:

A)    New City

B)     Antonia Fortress / Temple Quarter / City of David

C)    Lower City

D)    Upper City / Herod’s Palace / Fortress Triangle / Yafo Gate Complex

4.2  Every gate, bastion, and fortress hex of a deployment zone’s external-to-Jerusalem wall perimeter must, if possible, be occupied by at least one Judean unit.  Garrison (purple) units may fulfill this requirement, as permitted, in lieu of faction units.  The Judean Player may assign Zealot 7-7 units, as desired, to supplement a faction’s 5-7’s & 2-6’s.

4.3  The Judeans must also garrison, with at least one unit, all internal gate hexes leading into a deployment zone.  Should one of these gates be garrisonable by more than one faction, which faction occupies it is the Judean Player’s choice.

4.4  After all garrison hexes are occupied by at least one Judean unit of any type, excess units may be added to each hex at the Judean Player’s discretion per stacking limits.

5.      SPECIAL RULES: INACTIVE / ACTIVE JUDEAN FACTIONS – To reflect the Judean forces’ poor threat response times due to command control problems in this scenario, not reflected in the regular “Full Siege Campaign Game”, all faction units are inactive at the start of play.  Zealot units and artillery are exempt from this restriction.  Inactive faction units, 5-7’s, 2-6’s and their Leaders, are flipped to their disrupted side to indicate this status.

5.1  A faction is immedi